Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire AR 15 Sporting Rifles Are Not Protected By the Second Amendment, Appeals Court Rules

According To The Fourth Circuit

What a bunch of cork suckers!

Where is the Fourth Circuit located? San Fran?

SF is under the 9th District Court's jurisdiction... 4th is East Coast.

Yeah like muskets during colonial times wern't the AR's of their day. Morons...........

How many times do the idiots have to challenge the 2nd?

Till they win.....

11 Obama appointees, they will keep it up. East coast south

Maryland, West VA, VA, NC, & SC.

The liberal media has been exposed for its sophistry, and no longer has any credibility.

Liberal courts are also being exposed, and no longer have any credibility.

Thank President Trump for these revelations.

Exactly. Every freedom we have is one judicial decision away from being taken. That's why the 2nd exists...

So, it looks like a weapon of war? That's the whole reason for the 2nd! The weapons are SUPPOSED to be weapons of war.

Drag them into the streets...

Seems pretty clear from the words. Not about sport shooting or hunting.

Gun rights never were about shooting & hunting.

Clearly they are not Americans....deport em.....

when the 2nd was written a musket was in mind but the founding fathers were smart enough to word to the future.

The 4th is essentially begging the SCOTUS to take this case. Why? Because they inverted the Miller decision they claim to rely upon.

TRH, supposedly trained at the UF School of Law, leaves that out entirely. Go figure.

First, the 2nd is not specific, and I believe that is on purpose. Once the principle of private ownership of arms is accepted, the responsibility to use them legally, is assumed. Second, it doesn't matter one whit what the platform of the weapon is, if it is used responsibly and properly. The left simply does not trust Americans to be responsible and lawful. After their performances post inaguration, they themselves certainly have no problem illegally using violence to force their agenda on others. I guess they figure we would do the same. By adding the specifics of what arm can be or can't be used, they are essentially rewriting law. They are using the judicial branch to do that. That's not their job. What a gigantic leap, to say any firearm is prohibited by the 2nd amendment, when there is absolutely no distinction of that sort at all. THAT is legislating from the bench. It is utter nonsense, that prohibiting any particular firearm will increase public safety in any way.

This is a temporary victory for the left. Ultimately SCOTUS will provide the resolution and this highlights the need for Judge Grsuch to be sworn in.