|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,745
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,745 |
I think you will understand that I'm trying to find a 220gn bullet that is not tough and will open on lighter game. I don't see why people find that so hard to understand. Captdavid I find it very interesting why you find it so hard to understand...
Camp is where you make it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065 |
Doubt that the outcome would change due to any of those bullets or those two calibers..
Whatever shot the best, accuracy-wise, could make a measurable difference...
Defend the Constitution
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
If the Partitions are accurate loads, I would use them without a second thought.
Last edited by Coyote_Hunter; 05/01/17.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
I would focus on what to do after you shoot. Big cooler, portable deep freeze, sawzall, etc.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,036
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,036 |
I hope the 150's Partition in a 7x57 will do the job cause that's what the wife will be shooting this fall in Montana.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097 |
I'm considering loading 160gn Partitions or 164gn Hornady Interlocks. Would you change or go with the 150s?.. If you have any mental doubts about 150NP penetration , I would load the .280 with 175NP.
-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325 |
Like almost everyone else, I'd suggest you stick with your tried and true recipe. Nothing wrong with NP 150's. But if you think extra bullet weight will be an advantage ( with the same bullet construction and you did mention distances under 200 yds) I'd go to 175 gr. bullets. At moderate range on Elk, heavier bullets are a little bit better in my opinion. Doubt if you'd notice any difference between 150's and 160's though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,158 Likes: 3 |
Use the 150's and go kill a cow elk.
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278 |
CD
My wife killed her first and only elk with a 7X57 and 160 partition approx 200 yds. Ran about 15'. She also killed a large black bear with the same load at 30 YDS or so. 1 shot.
Lefty C
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369 |
Federal has been loading the 280 with the 150 NP for years... i gotta believe it has been used by 280 shooters on a lot of elk...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,240 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,240 Likes: 1 |
150gr Bullets from .280 will probably bounce off an elks hide ..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,124 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,124 Likes: 3 |
No need to change anything.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,387 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,387 Likes: 4 |
150gr Bullets from .280 will probably bounce off an elks hide .. That's very true. That is why I use the Nosler 160 grains Partition in my .280 Remington to kill elk. L.W.
"Always go straight forward, and if you meet the devil, cut him in two and go between the pieces." (William Sturgis, clipper ship captain, 1830s.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,124 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,124 Likes: 3 |
I've killed a crap load of them with my 280 and 140 gr TTSX and even the old X bullets. has never ever been a problem. I've killed them anywhere from 25 yards to just over 400. I carry my .280 for cow elk far more than I do my .300 wby or .338 mag and have never wished I'd had one of the bigger guns. Honestly I should probably sell everything I own other than my .280 but the wife would just spend it on shoes. 😀 I sold my 340Wby some ago and a 300 Wby just recently. While I really liked those two and particularly the 340 for elk, my next elk hunt Will be with my 284 which puts those 140 TTSX's in less than a MOA at 400 yds with R17.
|
|
|
|
681 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 22250rem, 160user, 06hunter59, 204guy, 70 invisible),
2,685
guests, and
1,497
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,610
Posts18,492,474
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|