24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
G
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
G
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
Greetings all,

I'm aware of MD's great work on 9.3X62mm loads but now, with some TAC on hand, wonder whether anyone has experimented with it in the 9.3X62?

Thanks in advance.

GB1

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,082
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,082
I was going to try TAC since it worked so well in my 358 Win. but, I found two different loads using Ramshot Big Game that worked really well in my CZ 550.


Start young, hunt hard, and enjoy God's bounty.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
TAC is a really fine powder for the 358 Win with 200-225s, also 250-260s in the 350 Rem Mag based 375. The 9.3x62 falls right in the middle of those and should work decently to very well with TAC.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,161
Likes: 13
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,161
Likes: 13
It also works very well in the 9.3 Barsness-Sisk wildcat, which is the .350 necked up to 9.3, which has only slightly less case capacity than the 9.3x62.

I've somehow never gotten around to trying it, mostly because the 9.3x62 works so well with a wide variety of powders. TAC is my choice in the 9.3 B-S because it's so dense, which helps in loading the short case, especially with heavier bullets. In the B-S I use 58.0 grains with 250-grain bullets, which would be a good place to start in the 9.3x62 with 250's. With 286's I'd drop down to around 54 grains as a starter charge.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
G
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
G
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
Thank you very much MD, Klik and Biggs. Thus encouraged, I will have a go. Somewhat tangentially, and because you folks are using TAC for other things, it is so far yielding impressive accuracy in a .338-06 NULA with 160 grain TTSX bullets.

IC B2

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,161
Likes: 13
M
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,161
Likes: 13
Thanks for that info. It doesn't surprise me much (especially in a NULA), but out of curiosity what charge/primer are you using?


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
G
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
G
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 116
58 grains of TAC, CCI250 primer. Around 2900 fps.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 2
Dre Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 2
Came across this the other day regarding tac, big game, Hunter , etc...
http://blog.westernpowders.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/9.3x62-Data.pdf

Last edited by Dre; 05/16/17.

All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

573 members (12344mag, 16penny, 01Foreman400, 007FJ, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 57 invisible), 2,464 guests, and 1,187 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,649
Posts18,493,382
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.228s Queries: 30 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8254 MB (Peak: 0.8723 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 14:28:50 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS