|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,988 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,988 Likes: 3 |
I see the recommendations for 6x, 10x, 3x9, 3.5 x10 etc... on this thread for scopes for shots to 600 yards and beyond and I guess I'm a bit puzzled. This being the long range forum and all, I'm a bit surprised I'm not seeing recommendations for scopes in the 6.5 x 20, 6 x24, 5 x 25, etc... range for those long range shots. I've never been of the opinion you could "overscope' a rifle unless you really tried and for long range I've done fine with my 3x9 and 4.5 x 14 scopes, but for varmints I always like to have as much magnification as my rifle and carrying arm will handle- something in the 6.5 x 20 Leupold or 6 x24 B&L Elite series work best for me at the moment. I like to see what I am shooting at as well as possible and sometimes I Iike to see what I'm NOT shooting at, like small branches and things like that in the bullet patch you may not see otherwise. Also, sometimes you have a pretty narrow window to shoot through at the game moving or feeding in the trees or brush or among other animals and a little extra power can help pick through those instances. These seem to happen to me more often these days and a little extra scope power is sometimes a real blessing when it does. So, what are your thoughts on this? Give me a minute to get my Nomex underwear on.... Bob
Never underestimate your ability to overestimate your ability.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,012 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,012 Likes: 2 |
I see the recommendations for 6x, 10x, 3x9, 3.5 x10 etc... on this thread for scopes for shots to 600 yards and beyond and I guess I'm a bit puzzled. This being the long range forum and all, I'm a bit surprised I'm not seeing recommendations for scopes in the 6.5 x 20, 6 x24, 5 x 25, etc... range for those long range shots. I've never been of the opinion you could "overscope' a rifle unless you really tried and for long range I've done fine with my 3x9 and 4.5 x 14 scopes, but for varmints I always like to have as much magnification as my rifle and carrying arm will handle- something in the 6.5 x 20 Leupold or 6 x24 B&L Elite series work best for me at the moment. I like to see what I am shooting at as well as possible and sometimes I Iike to see what I'm NOT shooting at, like small branches and things like that in the bullet patch you may not see otherwise. Also, sometimes you have a pretty narrow window to shoot through at the game moving or feeding in the trees or brush or among other animals and a little extra power can help pick through those instances. These seem to happen to me more often these days and a little extra scope power is sometimes a real blessing when it does. So, what are your thoughts on this? Give me a minute to get my Nomex underwear on.... Bob I am with you sheister on scope power, I believe the ole saying aim small shoot small.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,877
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,877 |
I see the recommendations for 6x, 10x, 3x9, 3.5 x10 etc... on this thread for scopes for shots to 600 yards and beyond and I guess I'm a bit puzzled. This being the long range forum and all, I'm a bit surprised I'm not seeing recommendations for scopes in the 6.5 x 20, 6 x24, 5 x 25, etc... range for those long range shots. I've never been of the opinion you could "overscope' a rifle unless you really tried and for long range I've done fine with my 3x9 and 4.5 x 14 scopes, but for varmints I always like to have as much magnification as my rifle and carrying arm will handle- something in the 6.5 x 20 Leupold or 6 x24 B&L Elite series work best for me at the moment. I like to see what I am shooting at as well as possible and sometimes I Iike to see what I'm NOT shooting at, like small branches and things like that in the bullet patch you may not see otherwise. Also, sometimes you have a pretty narrow window to shoot through at the game moving or feeding in the trees or brush or among other animals and a little extra power can help pick through those instances. These seem to happen to me more often these days and a little extra scope power is sometimes a real blessing when it does. So, what are your thoughts on this? Give me a minute to get my Nomex underwear on.... Bob Bob, I don't think the OP, Dogger, ever responded regarding distances and target sizes. RMerta said deer vitals out to 600, and steel to 800 - 900. A 3-9x MQ handles that. If you're shooting varmints, I'm guessing that the cartridge and/or weight of the rifle help keep recoil low. And if you have a solid rest, like a field bench, then a narrow FOV may not matter. However, shooting a heavier recoiling rifle from some contorted field position with a narrow FOV can make spotting your hits, or misses, difficult no matter how well you build your firing position. Here, a fixed 6x is not a handicap on big game vital sized targets, at medium range. In fact it can be an advantage. No big deal to dial down a high power variable either. It's been said before. Many people are quick to over-scope themselves. That is why asked about distances and target sizes in my post on the first page. Unless you're shooting small targets, or have some vision problems, you can get by with a lot less magnification than some people assume. Someone did a survey of various longrange & PRS shooters, and from what I recall, 12x was found to be the top end for many. Their scopes could go higher, but in general they used lower magnification in order spot their shots. Also interesting to see more shooters going from .308 to 6.5mm Creedmooor, and to 6mm Creedmoor. There are certainly advantages in external ballistics going from .308 to 6.5mm Creedmoor, but going from 6.5mm to 6mm is mostly about lower recoil... and spotting shots. That is my experience. Distances, target size, recoil levels, and expectations, all factor into the equation and will vary from one shooter to another. Jason
Last edited by 4th_point; 02/24/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,213 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,213 Likes: 3 |
I'll take image quality over size every day. ....and if it doesn't track 100% bang on every time, it has no business shooting at game.
I would not buy something that runs on any kind of primer given the possibility of primer shortages and even regulations. In fact, why not buy a flintlock? Really. Rocks aren't going away anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,576 Likes: 8
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,576 Likes: 8 |
I see the recommendations for 6x, 10x, 3x9, 3.5 x10 etc... on this thread for scopes for shots to 600 yards and beyond and I guess I'm a bit puzzled. This being the long range forum and all, I'm a bit surprised I'm not seeing recommendations for scopes in the 6.5 x 20, 6 x24, 5 x 25, etc... range for those long range shots. I've never been of the opinion you could "overscope' a rifle unless you really tried and for long range I've done fine with my 3x9 and 4.5 x 14 scopes, but for varmints I always like to have as much magnification as my rifle and carrying arm will handle- something in the 6.5 x 20 Leupold or 6 x24 B&L Elite series work best for me at the moment. I like to see what I am shooting at as well as possible and sometimes I Iike to see what I'm NOT shooting at, like small branches and things like that in the bullet patch you may not see otherwise. Also, sometimes you have a pretty narrow window to shoot through at the game moving or feeding in the trees or brush or among other animals and a little extra power can help pick through those instances. These seem to happen to me more often these days and a little extra scope power is sometimes a real blessing when it does. So, what are your thoughts on this? Give me a minute to get my Nomex underwear on.... Bob Bob, I don't think the OP, Dogger, ever responded regarding distances and target sizes. RMerta said deer vitals out to 600, and steel to 800 - 900. A 3-9x MQ handles that. If you're shooting varmints, I'm guessing that the cartridge and/or weight of the rifle help keep recoil low. And if you have a solid rest, like a field bench, then a narrow FOV may not matter. However, shooting a heavier recoiling rifle from some contorted field position with a narrow FOV can make spotting your hits, or misses, difficult no matter how well you build your firing position. Here, a fixed 6x is not a handicap on big game vital sized targets, at medium range. In fact it can be an advantage. No big deal to dial down a high power variable either. It's been said before. Many people are quick to over-scope themselves. That is why asked about distances and target sizes in my post on the first page. Unless you're shooting small targets, or have some vision problems, you can get by with a lot less magnification than some people assume. Someone did a survey of various longrange & PRS shooters, and from what I recall, 12x was found to be the top end for many. Their scopes could go higher, but in general they used lower magnification in order spot their shots. Also interesting to see more shooters going from .308 to 6.5mm Creedmooor, and to 6mm Creedmoor. There are certainly advantages in external ballistics going from .308 to 6.5mm Creedmoor, but going from 6.5mm to 6mm is mostly about lower recoil... and spotting shots. That is my experience. Distances, target size, recoil levels, and expectations, all factor into the equation and will vary from one shooter to another. Jason This.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369 |
i have been AWOL on this thread... this is a dual use rifle for me... shooting paper from a bipod out to 1000 meters, and varmints/deer with shots most likely from the prone with a backpack for a rest.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423 |
My standard big game rifle is getting a USOptics B-17 the rest are transferring to Nightforce. The paper punchers have a variety of swfa ss and Leupolds on them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,353 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,353 Likes: 3 |
Which reticle are you gonna go with on the B-17?
Screw you! I'm voting for Trump again!
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the 24HCF.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,234
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,234 |
Which reticle are you gonna go with on the B-17? . He ordered the IGR reticle assuming he didn’t change the order for the 5th time. Got to visit Fred last weekend, drink his beer and whiskey and help the training of his deer to gunfire. Damndest thing you’ve ever seen as there were no deer around until his nephews started shooting shït with my 22/410 and the deer came running. Here the kids were shooting grapefruits off the stump in the foreground and the deer could literally care less. 2 deer on the feeder here during a ceasefire the let the one coming out of the trees to the right get across.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423 |
Which reticle are you gonna go with on the B-17? Yes IGR! LOL. It’s not here yet but the rent is payed on it so should be anytime now. If it’s better than my Nightforce’s it’s going to have to be really good. The 3.5-15x50 NXS in MOAR is quickly becoming my favorite. Was out Saturday afternoon she’s up to 1000 yards for sure. But th Shv f1 on the short mag7 is nothing to turn your nose up over.
Last edited by fredIII; 03/07/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,447
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,447 |
Particularly like the SWFA single power scopes: 10X, 12X or 16X.
1-4X for battle rifles.
3-9X hunting.
Unless a dawn or dusk shot...cheap works fine.
Don't ask me about my military service or heroic acts...most of it is untrue.
Pronoun: Yes, SIR !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914 Likes: 2 |
I have a caldwell 10" Steel Gong setup that I bought a couple years ago to shoot long at. You tell yourself that 10" shouldnt be no issue at all, but to date, once you get that thing out past 450-500 yards - even with very little wind - as dog shooter says - it can be very humbling. .
It certainly can be but when you find that consistent load for a consistent rifle with a consistent scope, it can be an awful lot of fun. Last trip out: Rovert....what’s you load in that 260? I am about to try that bullet in my Tikka hunter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 152
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 152 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,632
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,632 |
|
|
|
|
568 members (257Bob, 10gaugemag, 222ND, 160user, 21, 260madman, 47 invisible),
2,644
guests, and
1,276
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,368
Posts18,527,357
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|