|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,910
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,910 |
why not just make it SFP? Who didn't see THAT coming?....... He never disappoints.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,428
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,428 |
why not just make it SFP? Who didn't see THAT coming?....... He never disappoints. True dat!
"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!" --- Kid Rock 2022
Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,558
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,558 |
I fabricated a "field friendly" "windage lock" for my 3-9x42. Glad to see I am not the only one who does that....grin Good place for extry muzzle tape.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 297
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 297 |
Most hunters who live in western states hunt from trucks, therefore weight is not critical. Are you serious?
Last edited by Schaaf; 02/19/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,641
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,641 |
Yep.
We used to joke about it. "If you see someone off the road, he is usually from Texas."
Last edited by Borchardt; 02/19/18.
Imagine a corporate oligarchy so effective, so advanced and fine tuned that its citizens still call it a democracy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,935 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,935 Likes: 16 |
yeah, needing to be pulled out.......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,176
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,176 |
yeah, needing to be pulled out....... Kind of floated that one over the plate didn’t he?
Last edited by 175rltw; 02/19/18.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,359
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,359 |
The internals of a scope (less the lenses) make up the least amount of mass in a scope so designing the rest of it out of lighter wt. materials while maintaining strong/repeatable internals really shouldn't be that hard. I think even the internals could be lightened up as well with proper design and materials. The caveat is whether you can build that lighter, reliable scope to the same price point as the SWFA line. Potentially needing more expensive materials and manufacturing procedures to meet the wt./reliability requirements would run the price up, but I doubt the increase would be enough to scare most people off who appreciate what they would get, considering what many are willing to pay for high end scopes and rifles now
What components do make up the largest % of the mass? My guess is the tube, but I have never taken one apart so I don't know. I'd be interested to know if brass is the common material of choice by other manufacturers. There are certainly lighter weight materials that would seem to function just as well (disclaimer, I'm only speculating as I don't why brass is used here) in this application. Brass is soft with good and machines well. Maybe that keeps process costs down. I'd think titanium or higher grade aluminum alloys would be alternatives, but probably a cost increase as you suggest. Would be interested to find out if one would work, and at what cost.
Don't speculate when you don't know, and don't second guess when you do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478 |
The internals of a scope (less the lenses) make up the least amount of mass in a scope so designing the rest of it out of lighter wt. materials while maintaining strong/repeatable internals really shouldn't be that hard. I think even the internals could be lightened up as well with proper design and materials. The caveat is whether you can build that lighter, reliable scope to the same price point as the SWFA line. Potentially needing more expensive materials and manufacturing procedures to meet the wt./reliability requirements would run the price up, but I doubt the increase would be enough to scare most people off who appreciate what they would get, considering what many are willing to pay for high end scopes and rifles now
What components do make up the largest % of the mass? My guess is the tube, but I have never taken one apart so I don't know. I'd be interested to know if brass is the common material of choice by other manufacturers. There are certainly lighter weight materials that would seem to function just as well (disclaimer, I'm only speculating as I don't why brass is used here) in this application. Brass is soft with good and machines well. Maybe that keeps process costs down. I'd think titanium or higher grade aluminum alloys would be alternatives, but probably a cost increase as you suggest. Would be interested to find out if one would work, and at what cost. Brass is used because it resists corrosion so well. The same reason so many salt water fishing reels are made out of brass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,103 Likes: 6
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,103 Likes: 6 |
yeah, needing to be pulled out....... And given a breathalyzer.....
A wise man is frequently humbled.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
Super Snipers die the same as any other scope given enough use. This 6X died around the 4K mark. SWFA is going to warranty it of course. Dave
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230 Likes: 2 |
4k of what?
22lr, 223, 308?
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
.308. 155gr. Scenars. Mostly.
Dave
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,827 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,827 Likes: 6 |
I'd think bronze might even be better, but possibly more expensive. Back when I played with cameras, the story was that brass and bronze used together, or other dissimilar metals used in the focusing helicals would self-lubricate, while brass-on-brass, bronze-on-bronze, etc would gall. Helicals are a different mechanism, of course, but I'd imagine the principal would still apply, although the ratchety-clicky thing that holds the adjustment in place in a scope is probably a bit harder on the works.
Last edited by Pappy348; 03/11/18.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,094 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,094 Likes: 1 |
Did you mean to post that in the canted reticle thread?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
BOING!
I have a question for all those concerned by the way.
If the use of variable magnification is indicative of less reliability, wouldn't the use of a BDC reticle and not twisting turrets be inherently more reliable?
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927 |
You could remove the turrets and not want for much on a SWFA MQ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,444
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,444 |
This reticle is upside down.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230 Likes: 2 |
.308. 155gr. Scenars. Mostly.
Dave mine is gonna be good for a while then. Sycamore
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,827 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,827 Likes: 6 |
BOING!
I have a question for all those concerned by the way.
If the use of variable magnification is indicative of less reliability, wouldn't the use of a BDC reticle and not twisting turrets be inherently more reliable? Pretty much how I use my SS anyway, and one or two others, at the range anyway. In the field, I use the old standby method of most fat, lazy, weak, Eastern hunters of sighting in for 200 yards and holding on hair from 0-300. Most of the deer I shoot, or don't, are close enough to hear the clicks and see the movement.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
589 members (1936M71, 160user, 1234, 06hunter59, 007FJ, 1lessdog, 57 invisible),
2,399
guests, and
1,188
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,532
Posts18,491,216
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|