|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 259
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 259 |
Debating about whether to get an 84l or an 8400..
Calibers as listed in the title. Already have a 300wsm in an extreme weather and love the cartridge, but id sell the M70 if I got another 300wsm as I can't justify having two. That said though, I like the idea of the 280ai just for the cool factor, and having something different. Also less recoil is appealing.
I've had an 84l montana before in 270, as well as an 8400 in 300WM. Never handled a 8400 wsm though and I wonder how they compare in terms of handling?
Edited to add I already have dies/brass/everything to reload 300wsm so I would save some money by sticking with it.
What say you?
Last edited by Below_par; 05/23/18.
You only live once.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104 |
If you have a bunch of rifles, and just want another one, I would make the decision based on filling an existing hole. If you're looking for a big game rifle to use on everything from pronghorns and whitetails to elk, I would go with the .280 AI. There are no flies on the .300 WSM, though. I have been considering adding one in a Kimber Montana myself.
Ben
Some days it takes most of the day for me to do practically nothing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 499
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 499 |
I can't get too excited about the magazine box restriction in a 84L. I'm not thrilled with the mag box in the 84M, but there wasn't an alternative like the Fieldcraft when I bought my short action Montana.
So my vote is the WSM.
Last edited by Crowkiller; 05/23/18.
TANSTAAFL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,833
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,833 |
Do you really want to be tethered to the absolute worst customer service in the world?
Kimber USA.........we suck at everything except marketing
Maker of the Frankenstud Sling Keeper
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852 |
I've had both. 280 AI would be my choice.
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,972 |
Do you really want to be tethered to the absolute worst customer service in the world?
Kimber USA.........we suck at everything except marketing Are they worse than Beretta..........we are perfect and you are too small to matter?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
Some object to the recoil of the WSM in a lightweight. One friend a former Ranger that has undergone sniper training developed a flinch from his Tikka 300WSM to the point he got a muzzle brake for it. Pretty close in weight to the Kimber.
My choice would be a 280AI and I would do it with the M70 action and spend the money on a nice light weight stock and good barrel. It won't be as light as the Kimber but you can get it down to around seven pounds which is light enough for most uses. If done by a good gunsmith chances are it will shoot really well.
I am mixed on Kimber since they stopped making the left hand models, so take it for what it is worth. If they made a Lefty and sold it as a receiver only then I would become a fan quickly.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065 |
I hear knitting is an inexpensive hobby...:)
For myself would be hard pressed to see a reason to go with the larger caliber & recoil for killing, considering the quality of today's components.
Defend the Constitution
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458 Likes: 2 |
I would do .300 WSM and, since they're threaded now, add a Kimber's .308 brake if recoil is objectionable.
I had a .280AI in a Montana for a while and I didn't like the recoil. It was quick, jabby, and fairly significant. My rifle with Talley ringmounts and a Leupold 3.5-10x weight 6 lb 7.xxx ounces and I was pushing 160 grain partitions just barely over 3000 fps. That's not a pleasant balance. It's essentially a too-light 7mm mag. The other things I wasn't fond of was the long, spindly feel of the long action w/ 24 inch barrel. I think the short WSM action would help a little in that regard.
I would probably pick an 84L in .270 or '06 before I'd do the .280AI again. I like .280AI but I want a 7.5 pound rifle, not a 6.5 pound rifle.
Tom
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
Here be dragons ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 397
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 397 |
My choice would be the 8400 WSM because I prefer the 8400 over the 84. For this comparison the 84L is slightly longer, and at 3/4 lb lighter there isn't a massive difference in felt recoil shooting typical loads for both and there's probably some overlap for certain loads. The WSM is 3+1 and the AI is 4+1 if magazine capacity is important to you. I prefer the weight, proportions, barrel profile, safety and bolt handle of the 8400s and have three of them including two 8400 Mag and one 8400 WSM. I've never owned an 84L but have shot a bunch, and the .280 AI would certainly be my choice in an 84L. We do have an 84M Montana in the family that I've shot a fair bit. I had one about six years ago that I sold but I bought an 84M Montana in .308 Win for my girlfriend a couple of years ago which she really likes and enjoys hunting with. Too bad you can't handle an 8400 WSM to get a better idea of how it feels. I put a 6.5 PRC barrel on mine recently and am really enjoying shooting it. It has less recoil than an 84L in .280 AI but very similar ballistics. The magazine well in the WSM is 3.030" long so it's not hard to get the bullet close to the lands, particularly with longer bullets. I'd be interested to hear what you end up choosing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
I hear knitting is an inexpensive hobby...:) Some people shouldn't be allowed to use sharp objects. The 280AI covers all the bases well. Noise and recoil are well below a 300 WSM without sacrificing too much of anything.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,065 |
Agree on all counts, particularly if my wife wants to use the sharp objects...
Defend the Constitution
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,833
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,833 |
I hear knitting is an inexpensive hobby...:) Some people shouldn't be allowed to use sharp objects. The 280AI covers all the bases well. Noise and recoil are well below a 300 WSM without sacrificing too much of anything. The .280AI won't do anything that the 30-06 doesn't already do and it does it cheaper
Maker of the Frankenstud Sling Keeper
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971 Likes: 1 |
I’ve had both - 280AI by a long shot.
30-06... too funny, unless you like shooting 200+ grains
My 300WSM, less in the mag, less room for longer bullets, more bang,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 259
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 259 |
Thanks guys.
Firstly, I'm in Australia. The main thing about that is whilst Kimber USA may be crap to deal with, the Australian distributor of Kimber down here is excellent and always good.
I've got an 06 already, as well as a .270 in another M70. I don't really have a gap to fill as such, just more so an itch that I've wanted to scratch for a while in the form of the 280AI. Just trying to gather opinions about buying the WSM instead, as it would be a more economical option for me not having to buy brass/dies etc.
As for on game performance, I've down enough animals to know that they won't know the difference this side of 400 yards what rifle I hit them with. So it is somewhat of a null point. Both cartridges are perfectly capable.
You only live once.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,442 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,442 Likes: 1 |
I prefer classic. Semper Fi I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,237
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,237 |
The 8400 WSM Montana’s definitely fit me much better than the 84Ms or 84Ls.
As for recoil, the 84Ls I’ve shot (.280 AI and .30-06) both seemed harsher than either my 7mm wsm or the two .300s I’ve shot.
Those things considered, it’d be WSM for me all the way. I’m probably in the monority here though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 397
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 397 |
My 300WSM, less in the mag, less room for longer bullets, more bang, With 3.030" in the magazine (assuming you have an 8400 WSM) what bullet can't you shoot or what load requires more room due to "less room for longer bullets"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,790 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,790 Likes: 1 |
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,286
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,286 |
The 8400 MT stock is large. It has the pregnant guppy belly sans bottom metal. However, it handles recoil incredibly well. Really, in may ways better than the 84L stock. My complaint about the 8400 (and all MT's) is they don't have no.2 contours instead of the no.1's they come with. However, having had more than a couple 8400 WSM's going back to 2004, I can tell you the magazine is plenty long, and the 8400 feeds the WSM's better than any other non-single stack magazine rifle out there.
Not sure why you want to get rid of the m70 EW 300 WSM... if you want less recoil, the 8400 is not the route to go. And frankly neither is the 280 ai.
I've owned over 16 MT's... I'd suggest you get a 6.5 Creedmoor as a companion to your 300 WSM EW.
The light 280 ai MT kicks a fair bit... the Creedmoor, not so much.
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
585 members (22250rem, 10Glocks, 160user, 1936M71, 1beaver_shooter, 1Longbow, 68 invisible),
2,459
guests, and
1,282
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,477
Posts18,489,976
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|