|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688 |
On the Berger websight there is information referring to working up handloads recommending starting at a low to middle charge weight and find the best seating depth first.
Has anyone tried this and does it work with other bullets such as hornady eld's?
I posted this in the gunwriter section because I'm looking for some hard facts about this information that come from what I consider to be a reliable source. If possible please try not to post " Grandpa told me so replies" Bullets have changed over the years and perhaps the way working up loads has a forseable change that is in the making at least with some bullets.
I tried to post the info but was unsuccessful so my apologies for that
Trystan
Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197 |
I've been doing it that way for years....long before the WWW.....;)
Luck....is the residue of design...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688 |
Thanks Scenarshooter! Have you used this method with different types and brands of bullets or is it more of a VLD type method?
Last edited by Trystan; 08/27/18.
Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197 |
I use it on all load development from the start.
Seating depth is the most overlooked accuracy enhancer out there IMO. You'll find optimum base to ogive will work with most bullets, regardless of the brand. In other words, Lapua, Berger, Hornady, and Sierra will all shoot well using the the same BTO in the same rifle....once you find it.
Luck....is the residue of design...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 746 |
Hey Pat, is there an advantage to finding depth first? Or is it more a case of you have to start somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3 |
Pat,
What if the first charge you pick is right on a scatter node? Will that not swamp out the positive changes made by seating depth experimentation?
m
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,138 Likes: 10
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,138 Likes: 10 |
I've found the the same seating depth normally works on bullets of a certain type, but have found the most accurate seating depth can also vary considerably if different styles of bullets are used, say monolithics versus softer target-type bullets.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,236 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,236 Likes: 1 |
John (M.D.)
Do you determine seating depth early on per the OP's question or after determining powder charge?
Let's Go Brandon! FJB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,197 |
Hey Pat, is there an advantage to finding depth first? Or is it more a case of you have to start somewhere? It saves time, components, and barrel wear...I wish I had back all the powder and bullets I wasted trying to find the best loads before I learned about seating depth. My rifles are used in the field, for either hunting, or shooting comps, so I need function, and reliability first and foremost. I stay away from seating too close to the lands. I don't want problems in the field with rounds that are hard to close the bolt on(I full length resize), or worse, sticking a bullet in the throat while removing a loaded round from the chamber. This happened once a few years back with a .308, while I was out on a coyote damage complaint. When I switched lot numbers on a fresh box of 1000 155gr scenars. The new lot had a little longer bearing surface and were jammed into the lands instead of out a few thousandths...my fault for not checking the length when I ran out of the old lot. The story had a happy ending as I called in a trio of adult coyotes from one location and started in on them at about 150 meters. the first two went down right away, but the third one took a broadside hit to the ribs and took off behind a large gumbo hill. I cycled another round into the chamber expecting him to appear after clearing the hill, but he never showed. It turned out to be a lethal hit. When I removed the live round from the chamber, the case came out, followed by 45.5grs of Varget into the locking ports, chamber, and trigger sear, rendering the rifle completely useless, for the time being anyway.....so in short, I try to stay away from getting too close. Most of my rifles shoot better with a safe jump anyway. Modern bullets and barrels are a lot better than they were 25 or so years ago. I start 5 thousandths off, and work back...and recheck BTO when lot numbers change...;)
Luck....is the residue of design...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,831
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,831 |
Pat,
What if the first charge you pick is right on a scatter node? Will that not swamp out the positive changes made by seating depth experimentation?
m MM: good question, but wouldn’t it apply in reverse: what if the first seating depth is right on the scatter node? Gotta start somewhere...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,851
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,851 |
I'm not following the idea of determining seating depth first. How does this work using a rather generic powder charge?
I normally shot 3 shots of the same powder in 1 grain increments for most big game cartridges. I see where it groups the best, then play with seating depth and incremental powder charges to fine tune. I'm interested in how to determine seating depth first.
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3 |
Pat,
What if the first charge you pick is right on a scatter node? Will that not swamp out the positive changes made by seating depth experimentation?
m MM: good question, but wouldn’t it apply in reverse: what if the first seating depth is right on the scatter node? Gotta start somewhere... My seating depth experimentation, all subsequent to narrowing down the charge, has not shown me as much difference as there was getting the powder charge about right. Can't say about the other way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735 |
I've found the the same seating depth normally works on bullets of a certain type, but have found the most accurate seating depth can also vary considerably if different styles of bullets are used, say monolithics versus softer target-type bullets. This in spades! When you are loading monos, seating depth does tend to be constant across velocity/charge weights. But...monos can and do exhibit considerable sensitvity to velocity and sorting out seating depth at the wrong velocity is entirely capable of teaching you that. I have one 25-06 that I still do not have solved because it is so touchy about velocity. I have/had a .243 that was likewise touchy about velocity. I have seen rifles quite capable of 8 inch groups at the wrong charge weight/velocity and the same rifle also capable of 8 inch groups at the wrong seating depth. In my experience the long barrels, 26 inchers, are more prone to this than shorter barrels and barrel weight does not necessarily mitigate that. For me, I use fewer bullets trying to find optimum or near optimum charge weight than I do seeking seating depth. The most efficient (in terms of bullets wasted) method is if accuracy needs improvement with a mono is to move up to .005 off and start backing up .010 per iteration. Usually you find accuracy before you get back to .100 off and surprisingly often if I do not have accuracy at .050 off (where I start) it does tend to be very close to .005. I have no idea in the beginning how to tell if the rifle is velocity sensitive with monos. I assume that all are seating sensitive with monos and find very few are not I have a couple of rifles that like monos right up against the lands or slightly jammed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3 |
It may not be velocity sensitivity as much as barrel time sensitivity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
It may not be velocity sensitivity as much as barrel time sensitivity. The faster the bullet the LESS barrel time. The slower the bullet the MORE barrel time. Well DUH ! ! Sorry M M, the door was open......... Still Your Friend Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,854 Likes: 3 |
It may not be velocity sensitivity as much as barrel time sensitivity. The faster the bullet the LESS barrel time. The slower the bullet the MORE barrel time. Well DUH ! ! Sorry M M, the door was open......... Still Your Friend Jerry Not necessarily. You can have two loads with the same exit velocity but different barrel times. At the drag strip two cars can post the same mph but different elapsed times because their acceleration curves are different. Similarly, two propellants may give the same velocity but different barrel times because their burn characteristics are different. I was actually lying in wait for a response like yours.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
[quote=jwall][quote=mathman]It may not be velocity sensitivity as much as barrel time sensitivity. The faster the bullet the LESS barrel time. The slower the bullet the MORE barrel time. Well DUH ! ! Not necessarily. You can have two loads with the same exit velocity but different barrel times. At the drag strip two cars can post the same mph but different elapsed times because their acceleration curves are different. Similarly, two propellants may give the same velocity but different barrel times because their burn characteristics are different. I was actually lying in wait for a response like yours. WELL... I was NOT talking about 2 with the SAME velocity. Faster ->-> & ->-> Slower Jerry I'm NOT arguing.
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,730
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,730 |
We used to see that while determining loads for specialized applications. Identical MVs, with the OAL adjusted so that the internal volume is identical.
Barnes 130 gr copper bullet
IMR powder 4895 had an exit velocity of 2750 fps and a barrel time of 1.139 ms. PMax - 40,669 psi IMR powder 4064 had an exit velocity of 2750 fps and a barrel time of 1.080 ms. PMax - 43,527 psi
Hornady 130 gr cup and core SP
IMR powder 4895 had an exit velocity of 2750 fps and a barrel time of 1.145 ms. PMax - 40,132 psi IMR powder 4064 had an exit velocity of 2750 fps and a barrel time of 1.109 ms. PMax - 43,086 psi
Check the Pmax for the two powders as they relate to the barrel time.
Safe Shooting! Steve Redgwell www.303british.comGet your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,138 Likes: 10
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,138 Likes: 10 |
Another factor in seating depth is the "evenness" of the lands in the front of the chamber. In factory rifles, they're often of different lengths, due to the reamer not being perfectly centered in the bore. Thus a bullet will engrave on the "longest" land before engaging the others. I've often found such chambers shoot best with deeper-seated bullets, probably because the bullet gets more of a run at the lands before engraving, so doesn't get tilted as much by the longer lands on one side. I suspect this is one reason many monolithics shoot better when seated deeper.
At the other extreme, the lands in front of custom-chambered rifles normally have very even lands--and I've often found even monolithics to shoot best when seated pretty close to their lands.
But as an example of how differently even very similar bullet require different seating depths to shoot well, I once had a factory Weatherby Mark V that started shooting 130-grain Ballistic Tips into half-inch groups during the very first range session. All I'd done was seat them so the rounds would just fit in the magazine, since the Weatherby freebore prevented them from being seated anywhere near the lands.
Next I tried 130 Nosler E-Tips, using the same powder charges and seating depth. The E-Tips use a very similar ogive as the same caliberBallistic Tips, and in fact are essentially Ballistic Tips without a lead core. The E-Tips grouped into around an inch and a half, so I started seating them deeper. At a full 10th of an inch deeper than the Ballistic Tips they also shot into around 1/2".
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
Another factor in seating depth is the [/b] "evenness" of the lands in the front of the chamber.[b] In factory rifles, they're often of different lengths, [/b]due to the reamer not being perfectly centered in the bore.[b] Thus a bullet will engrave on the "longest" land before engaging the others. I've often found such chambers shoot best with deeper-seated bullets, probably because the bullet gets more of a run at the lands before engraving, so doesn't get tilted as much by the longer lands on one side. I suspect this is one reason many monolithics shoot better when seated deeper.
Boy, that sounds familiar, like I've heard that before. (no criticism M D) Don't tell anyone... shhh it may have been mathman (whisper) Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
590 members (1OntarioJim, 16penny, 10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 1Longbow, 10gaugemag, 66 invisible),
2,493
guests, and
1,332
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,189
Posts18,484,912
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|