|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,081
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,081 |
My only “largeish” bore handgun is a Ruger Blackhawk .41 Magnum. I want an N frame S&W. I would buy an M24 or M25 if the price is right, but at an equal price would prefer a .41 or .44 magnum. Which to go with? I reload, but not as much as I used to. I have a .41 and love it but frequently curse the lack of availability and cost of .41 mag ammo. The M29 will kick a bit more, but ammo is more available and cheaper. I’ve read that the .41 mag is the perfect fit for the S&W N frame, but I doubt I will test the durability of an M29 in my lifetime.
Thanks in advance, Expat
Last edited by ExpatFromOK; 01/23/19.
"There are no dangerous weapons. There are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000 |
i have two specific revolvers sitting in the safe next to each other. one is a 657 lew horton 3inch 41magnum, the other is a 629lew horton 3inch in .44magnum. they look like twins. the difference is .410, to .429. that ain't much. i reload and don't buy much if any factory ammo, and i favor 41 magnum. but looking at the siblings, there isn't that much difference.
THE BIRTH PLACE OF GERONIMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,371
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,371 |
Specials through my 629 Classic made it a whole lot more tolerable. The lady who sold it only tried the full bore magnums through it and it hit the used shelf after only a few shots through it. $400. at the pawn shop out the door. Just for the ammo availability, I'd sure go with the 29 in your case.
My other auto is a .45
The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,630
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,630 |
M-57, hands down.
But if you really just gotta have the big hole in the end of the barrel, find a 5" with a full length lug & thank me later.
MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,925
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,925 |
Personally I’d go with the 29 (.44). There is not a big difference in performance, but as you stated, many more components available! memtb
Last edited by memtb; 01/23/19.
You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel
“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,154
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,154 |
Well, I have both the M29 and the M57. Love them both, I enjoy reloading for both, so ammo availability isn't a problem, and I enjoy shooting them both. All that said, there is nothing that I would tackle with the 44 mag that I would not go after with the 41 mag. My recommendation to you is to find a way to get both! If in the process you happen to run across the M24 and M25, buy them too! (Maybe that is just the looney in me talking).
My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,081
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,081 |
Well, I have both the M29 and the M57. Love them both, I enjoy reloading for both, so ammo availability isn't a problem, and I enjoy shooting them both. All that said, there is nothing that I would tackle with the 44 mag that I would not go after with the 41 mag. My recommendation to you is to find a way to get both! If in the process you happen to run across the M24 and M25, buy them too! (Maybe that is just the looney in me talking). Great response! I like how you think!
"There are no dangerous weapons. There are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,907
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,907 |
M-57, hands down.
But if you really just gotta have the big hole in the end of the barrel, find a 5" with a full length lug & thank me later.
MM I agree M-57 hands down. I have both and I like the M-29, I love the M-57
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,630
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,630 |
I long regret selling the best M-57 that I had, a no-dash version.
Still got dies & ammo so I need another one.
But honestly, the 5" full lug M-27 is a really nice gun to & you can always download it for everyday use.
Actually, a friend has a M-69 & it's a nice shooting gun too.............can't say how it would hold up to a constant & frequent diet of full house loads, but for milder loads routinely & occasional heavy loads, it's a nice gun................L-frames fit my hand well.
MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,686
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,686 |
Not sure I have ever seen an inaccurate .41 Magnum.
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,781
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,781 |
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,536
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,536 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,521
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,521 |
My only “largeish” bore handgun is a Ruger Blackhawk .41 Magnum. I want an N frame S&W. I would buy an M24 or M25 if the price is right, but at an equal price would prefer a .41 or .44 magnum. Which to go with? I reload, but not as much as I used to. I have a .41 and love it but frequently curse the lack of availability and cost of .41 mag ammo. The M29 will kick a bit more, but ammo is more available and cheaper. I’ve read that the .41 mag is the perfect fit for the S&W N frame, but I doubt I will test the durability of an M29 in my lifetime.
Thanks in advance, Expat Model 29.
Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468 |
Not a lot of difference performance wise. Ammo is much easier to get in .44 mag. I have both, prefer the .41 Mag but I reload. My carry pistol when hunting backup/close shot is a 357PD. A not often seen S&W Scandium 4" in .41 mag, much more pleasant than it's big brother the 329PD.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,862
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,862 |
I figured the 41 would deliver all the recoil I ever wanted to deal with. And it does with a 250 gr cast bullet over a case full of H110. Alternately it can be loaded with a 170 gr at 700 fps for a very pleasant shooting load for youth and ladies.
But one can not find those pleasant shooting "special equivalent" loads downtown. So if a guy wishes to avoid the loading bench, the 29/629 is the answer.
A handloader will not find a nickel's worth of difference between the 41 and the 44 mag.
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000 |
Not sure I have ever seen an inaccurate .41 Magnum. i have heard that statement many times. From the number of 41's i have acquired, i would say it's a true statement.
THE BIRTH PLACE OF GERONIMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,953
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,953 |
41 Magnums haven't been molested over the years as far as nominal throat and barrel groove dimensions are concerned.
Manufacturers have "gotten" the .410-.411 part down. Of course it helped being the one and only factory .41 caliber handgun cartridge, not based on any other previous design and having no true forerunner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
It sounds like you've already thought through a lot of it. One more thing as an addendum to the versatility aspect...The Model 29 will have much heavier bullets available. If you like shooting 300 grain bullets and such, then the Model 29 is the way. It sounds like you're more into old school type stuff since you say you might buy a 24 or 25 under the right circumstances, so it sounds like you might want to try the model 57.
I've owned a ton of model 29's but only one 57. I wish I had the 57 back. Of course I've already got a 629 so...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,920
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,920 |
I started out with .44 Magnums back in the 1970s, went to .44 Special in the 1980s but always had one .41 4" S&W around....starting in the early 1990s all the .44s left and only three .41s remained...a Ruger BH 4 5/8" and two 57s, a 4" and 6"....those three slowly grew to 30+... .41 is an addiction not a caliber...
I've also had several .44s during that time, three Mountain Guns, a 5" 629 Classic and a 1959 Blackhawk.....none of them stayed and I am currently FourtyFourless....
So some questions Mr OK....
Is this just going to be a range shooter or something you could carry and hunt with?
Any particular barrel length you would like?
What and where are you buying the ammo for your Ruger?
...and most importantly...why don't you reload?
There is now more variety and manufacturers of .41 ammo than ever before. And now fewer manufacturers of .41 handguns than ever before... If it wasn't for Ruger, Freedom Arms and Henry there would be no .41s... S&W still has one 6" blue but for not much more money one can find excellent used ones that will hold their value much better than ones with The Lock....
You can't really go wrong with either...I just find the .41s I've had shot more accurately and easier on the hand...
Bob
If you can not deal with reality, reality will deal with you....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055 |
Agreed that in a S&W N frame the gun is maxed out with a .41 Remington Magnum. My experience is that multiple loads will shot close to the same point and all will be accurate.
Agreed the .44 Magnum is available with more factory loads and with notably heavier factory loads. However in my not at all humble opinion such loads are excessive in an N frame. I have found the very heavy full diameter far forward bullets to be too long for best function in a couple of .44 Magnum pistols when seated to normal depths. I also have a nagging suspicion that the .41 Magnum is close enough to the .44 magnum that for a step up the larger meplat possible with a .45 is necessary for any step up in performance over the .41
So in an N frame I would buy, as I have multiple times, the .41 Magnum. I would be happy to have a .44 Magnum in a different pistol.
|
|
|
|
624 members (12344mag, 1234, 007FJ, 10gaugemag, 10ring1, 10gaugeman, 59 invisible),
2,822
guests, and
1,291
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,610
Posts18,473,854
Members73,941
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|