As if different fields of science have scientists with different levels of political motivation. GFY MOFO
Maybe if so many of your fellow scientist didn't sell out for the next grant or worship at the alter of liberalism you would have a better argument. Try policing your own ranks rather than us.
Originally Posted by Judman PS, if you think Trump is “good” you’re way stupider than I thought! Haha
Man, that is pretty fubar. Maybe if you knew anything about peer review ... Should just abolish the National Academies and let you and your cohorts run the show. Phouc off to you too.
All scientists aren't bad. Some are rocket scientists, some chemists, etc. One volcanic eruption, like Mt. St. Helens, can put more pollution and greenhouse gas into the atmosphere than all the industrial nations combined in one year. Also, the suns solar flare activity and lack of it can cause more heat or less heat to hit the earth and have more effect on the weather than anything man does. Some scientists have said this about both these statements. It doesn't fit the leftist/world socialism/globalism narrative. The get and pay scientists to give them their conclusions. Russia even stated that a lot of the cold temperatures they recorded and sent to the UN or whatever world climate people were doctored to show higher temperatures to "prove" global warming.
Nah, but y’all sound an awful lot like the postmodern deconstructionists you deride. Science is a social construct eh? Anyone who thinks that can go stroke his square root of minus one with Lacan and Foucault.
Battan down the hatches boys.........Alexandria,,, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH,,,, KUUUUK SEEE OOOOO,,,,,Cortezzzzzzzzzz says we have only 12 years left before the world comes to an end....Climate change will kill us all............Socialism to the rescue!!!
Naw, don’t think anything was struck that haddent been brought into the house already. Pretty plain her pride had been tickled prior to this event. Peer reviews aside, comprehension isn’t an issue as she didn’t read past the headlines or it might have been plain (as to everyone else) that the article was not Carte Blanche inclusive of “all” but just a “few” Emotions are a bitch to have to wake up to frequently. Hint there...
"You've been here longer than the State of Alaska is old!" *** my Grandaughters
For anyone so inclined, pick up and read a copy of "A Disgrace to the Profession".
Michael Mann fabricated the Global Warming data set that is a significant foundation for the Paris Climate accord, and for Al Gore's Nobel Prize. This is also known as the "Hockey Stick" graph. Mark Steyn interviewed more than 100 of the top climate scientists, from around the world, from the left and the right, who all agree that Michael Mann's Hockey Stick data is: "dishonest", "bad science", brazen fraud", "a crock of obvious drivel"...
Long story short, while the majority of climate scientists agree that our "climate is changing", they also agree that the current raft of politicized climate research is getting in the way of determining the true "How?", and "Why?" that our environment is changing...
I won't go into all of the gory details. However, there appears to be more than enough "peer reviewed" scientific data to refute Michal Mann's hockey stick fabrication. Unfortunately, the peer reviewed data does not fit the "agenda". Why does the peer reviewed climate data not fit the "agenda" ? ... Simply because the peer reviewed climate data does NOT show a strong correlation between human activity and the vagaries of well documented climatic changes...
I´ll rather trust hundreds of climate scientists, in oceanography, metrology, hydrology, geology, physics etc etc... then somebody on a hunting forum that got all their information from Oil, Coal and Gas sponsored cable news.
I guess its all the Massive volcanoes and forrest fires all over the world that has caused CO2 to explode after 1950..
The US in the last 40 years:
Socialism for big corporations and military industrial complex
I´ll rather trust hundreds of climate scientists, in oceanography, metrology, hydrology, geology, physics etc etc... then somebody on a hunting forum that got all their information from Oil, Coal and Gas sponsored cable news.
I guess its all the Massive volcanoes and forrest fires all over the world that has caused CO2 to explode after 1950..
Read and weep, you lying creep. And, stick your lying computer generated BS up your ass.
Curious as to the location of the data collected from ice cores, and the location for the number represented for modern day. I would imagine some locations are more saturated with CO2 than others. Assuming that CO2 drives temp. I do know that the temperature graphs usually start in 1880, an unusually cold year. That would show a greater temperature disparity .
To Northman, you believed Zero, Hillary, and the Russian Dossier.
John Bates is the former Nobel Prize winning physicist and internationally renowned weather scientist who discovered NOAA cooked the books on climate change.
![[Linked Image]](https://www.climate.gov/sites/default/files/paleo_CO2_2017_620.gif)
