|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't. I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,506 |
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't. I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future. They are on the 2 GEN of the 3.5 ecoboost introduced 2017. I have yet to see anything on a GEN 3 ecoboost.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 29,383 |
Exactly the reason that I bought the old proven low end torque last 5.4 in 2010 instead of the new 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2011. There's no replacement for displacement. My turbo Saab was fidgety fast while the turbo seals lasted, but they didn't. I think Ford got the turbo and Ecoboost carbon issue solved with the 3rd generation engine. I don't think they will be offering V8 F150's in the future. They are on the 2 GEN of the 3.5 ecoboost introduced 2017. I have yet to see anything on a GEN 3 ecoboost. Under the impression the 2017 model year was change 3 , I might be wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278 |
UPDATE
Did another flush.
Idle smoothed out, mileage back to 17.5
Lefty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 264
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 264 |
I have the 2011 ecoboost with 100k+ miles with no problems. 18mpg running empty and 13mpg pulling. I would get a second opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,676
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,676 |
My 2016 work van transit 350 has the Eco boost 1 ton loaded to near capacity daily 100K between 13-15 mpg average zero issues
|
|
|
|
678 members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 22250rem, 160user, 06hunter59, 204guy, 71 invisible),
2,687
guests, and
1,505
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,610
Posts18,492,482
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|