With a cartridge that does so well with 129-147-grain bullets, I have a hard time seeing the allure of a 100-grain bullet, for anything but varmints. It loses the bc battle pretty quickly and if 100-grain is the preference, why not shoot a 6mm of some type?
I carry 243s afield also... depends on my mood at the moment...
But since you questioned why a 6.5 mm with a 100 grain ballistic tip, or bullet..
I'll use an example of what I have done twice...
100 GR Ballistic tip...charge of 43.5 grs of 4064, 3350 fps MV.
Using the hood of an old F250 from the early 80s, for a bench rest. Harris Bi Pod
Leupold 3 x 9 on top of a Ruger 77 Mk 2...set on 4 power...Target dot reticle.
both times deer at 300 plus yards walking thru brush at the edge of a clear cut..
both times, deer came thru an opening, after trailing them in the scope..
pulled the trigger with no compensation for distance, scope set at 3.5 inch high from 100 yd zero.
both times, the deer dropped like a sack of potatoes.. and never lost sight picture in the scope during recoil.
watched them go down in the scope...
Several other deer, one was one of the largest blacktail I've taken.. 175 lbs..
150 to 175 yds... rest against a tree, same Ruger Rifle and Scope. both shots, right thru the heart.
after the successes I've had with the 100 grain Ballistic Tip, 100 grain Hornady SP and the 100 grain Sierra HP..... I have seen the need for the extra recoil that would come with a heavier bullet....
yet the same rifle has dropped Blacktails with the 129 grain Horn SP and the 140 grain Horn SP.
Same results, just more recoil that the 129 and 140s...
Same rifle has also had good results with the 120 grain Ballistic Tips, 125 grain Partition...
The less recoil with the 100s, allows me to see the deer drop in the sight picture of the scope..when set on 3 or 4 power...
a Ruger 6.5 x 55 has also produced the same results...with the same bullets.