...to answer to The Freedom Caucus members Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan's request for information.
Any bets on whether Deep State Barr answers their request, or ignores and obstructs?
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important? How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker. Define 'stage set'. Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance? If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important? How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker. Define 'stage set'. Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance? If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
Why do you and the other Q'bers always talk in questions and riddles, and code?
If this is so straight forward, why all the caveats?
Why not just tell it like it is, without the huge margin of error for failure, which can be spun into the next unbelievable narrative?
When I watch the weather forecast, I want to know what temperature it's going to be. I want to know whether it's gonna rain tomorrow or not.
I don't want the damned weather man to stand up there with a gray map and ask ME questions for the entire time...
I would like the next 6 years to look something like the recent hearing with the House and Matt Whitaker. Matt owned that place and had the liberals pissing up their legs. I want to see some more of that.
kwg
For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
Barr cant answer any questions concerning any ongoing investigation,, plain an simple,, If Barr or POTUS or Huber or anybody declasses info,and leaks it, said info will have "tainted" the investigation, and compromising the investigation, and will be disregaurded,,even if its a smoking gun,,,with pics and audio,,, investigations have to come to a close before info is revealed,,as big as this is and the way our .gov works,who can say,,,
Instead of blowing thru or brushing off post's like K22's,, Take an hour or 2 and see if you can truthfully answer those questions, you may see things in a diff light if you do some research
Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important? How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker. Define 'stage set'. Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance? If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
Why do you and the other Q'bers always talk in questions and riddles, and code?
If this is so straight forward, why all the caveats?
Why not just tell it like it is, without the huge margin of error for failure, which can be spun into the next unbelievable narrative?
'Cause he's got nothing, NOTHING
Barr is at least as bad a mistake as Sessions was.
I would like the next 6 years to look something like the recent hearing with the House and Matt Whitaker. Matt owned that place and had the liberals pissing up their legs. I want to see some more of that.
Who appointed and tasked HUBER? Who appointed and tasked the OIG? Who was AG? [zero leaks - none] Transfer from AG1 to AG2? Why might that be important? How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'? Optics are important. When are optics not important? Think Whitaker. Define 'stage set'. Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command? What 'stage' experience did this person have? Think Bill Clinton impeachment. Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance? If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin? How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue? Define 'thesis' statement. What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?
Why do you and the other Q'bers always talk in questions and riddles, and code?
If this is so straight forward, why all the caveats?
Why not just tell it like it is, without the huge margin of error for failure, which can be spun into the next unbelievable narrative?
When I watch the weather forecast, I want to know what temperature it's going to be. I want to know whether it's gonna rain tomorrow or not.
I don't want the damned weather man to stand up there with a gray map and ask ME questions for the entire time...
Looking up something for yourself helps to remember it, makes it worth the time and trouble. We are so use to having every thing handed to us or answered by someone that we continue to help them dumb us down. First its free money, now its free answers to questions we don't want to take the time to look up. Maybe Bernie Sanders should be President!
Barr cant answer any questions concerning any ongoing investigation,, plain an simple,, If Barr or POTUS or Huber or anybody declasses info,and leaks it, said info will have "tainted" the investigation, and compromising the investigation, and will be disregaurded,,even if its a smoking gun,,,with pics and audio,,, investigations have to come to a close before info is revealed,,as big as this is and the way our .gov works,who can say,,,
SO WHEN"S IT GONNA END??????????????
In our lifetimes, maybe, maybe not....................looks pretty endless & what incentive does Mueller have to stop now with the Dems in control & willing to go on 'til the next election with whatever non-sense they can dream up.
