I have a 20 MOA base on my 284 HB. It carries a sightron scope. That scope will not zero inside 200 yards. Even then it is bottomed out nearly. But that is a rifle intended for 1000 yards.
More than likely you would be better served by a 10 moa base.
The older I become the more I am convinced that the voice of honor in a man's heart is the voice of GOD.
I have a 20 MOA base on my 284 HB. It carries a sightron scope. That scope will not zero inside 200 yards. Even then it is bottomed out nearly. But that is a rifle intended for 1000 yards.
More than likely you would be better served by a 10 moa base.
Nah, you’d be better served by a scope better suited to the purpose of that rifle...
Everything below zero on the erector,is 100% fhuqking USELESS. Hint.
20MOA inclination,is a joke,at best.
Hint.................
Stick, do you keep the erector at the center and make elevation potential from the rail and ring insert combinations and hash marks? Does keeping the erector somewhat centered improve optical quality and maintain mechanical quality of the erector? I ask because of your statement of being below zero is a waste. Thanks
This is very dependent on scope design. A well-designed scope has optical quality and mechanical integrity that is affected little by the position of the erector. The SWFA SS, Bushnell LRHS, and several others, share this design commonality, and can be zero’d with enough inclination in the mounting system to bottom out the erector, with little to no negative impact. The Bushnell DMRII, for example, functions mechanically perfectly at all positions of the erector, but with that particular scope design the optical performance suffers significantly as the erector travels away from
With a well-designed scope, there’s no downside to adding inclination until the erector is about bottomed out after being zero’d.
I have a 20 MOA base on my 284 HB. It carries a sightron scope. That scope will not zero inside 200 yards. Even then it is bottomed out nearly. But that is a rifle intended for 1000 yards.
More than likely you would be better served by a 10 moa base.
It takes a pretty poor scope to not handle a 20 moa cant and still zero at 100 yards. More likely your mounting system is not true to the barrel and has more cant built in than you think. Either that, or your windage adjustment is way off to one side (again because of an out of true mount), which reduces available vertical adjustment in the scope.
For reference, 20 moa is roughly equal to 6 mils. That's not very much, and most scopes intended for dialing can handle it easily with plenty to spare.
If you aren't running out of adjustment you don't need one. Not needing something but having it anyway isn't a big deal, but like most things there is pluses and minuses. Pluses are more elevation adjustment, some flexibility in mounting and scope interchange ability. Both are good if you need them and useless if you don't.
Minuses are obstructing the loading port, potential higher than optimum mounting, they cost sometime, and weigh something. I see rifles that are harder to load than they have to, with adjustable stocks that they wouldn't have needed otherwise, all at at cost in dollars, just to solve a problem they didn't even have.
I'm guilty to, having many rifles that have slanted rails that they don't need and will never need. Just a pain in the butt that I had to pay for.
Life begins at 40. Recoil begins at "Over 40" Coincidence? I don't think so.
Appreciate the input. I plan to limit my shooting to no more than 600 yards with my 280, 7 Wby, 308 or 300 WSM.
Rule of thumb for me is if 600 yds or less then I can use standard mounts with 0 cant. More than 600 yds it's a 20 MOA rail. BUT if I'm going to use a rail it'll be a 20 MOA because there's no real reason to go for a 0 MOA rail over a 20. On rifles I'm carrying a lot I prefer two piece bases and rings just because I like to carry them with my thumb hooked between the scope & rifle and a rail interferes with that.
The rail is a superior system though and if you are going to use one then make it a 20 MOA, there's no real reason to buy a 0 MOA rail that I can see.
Everything below zero on the erector,is 100% fhuqking USELESS. Hint.
20MOA inclination,is a joke,at best.
Hint.................
Stick, do you keep the erector at the center and make elevation potential from the rail and ring insert combinations and hash marks? Does keeping the erector somewhat centered improve optical quality and maintain mechanical quality of the erector? I ask because of your statement of being below zero is a waste. Thanks
The LAST fhuqking thing I want,is an erector centered at zero. You just threw halfa your scope in the dumpster.
I want a glass that'll cough up all of it's erector travel,less concession(s). Have lotsa platforms,that yield 40 Mils or better on the erectors alone,at their zero range.
Hint......................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
I've used the follow rough rule of thumb when considering how much base cant to use on a rifle. Much of course depends on your rifle and load. It's silly to use a 40 MOA base on a rifle that's meant to shoot 200 yds or less, even if the scope has enough the elevation adjustment to use a canted base. At the same time it's also silly to have a rifle, cartridge and scope capable of shooting 1,000 yds. and choking it down with a base and scope that won't let you utilize it's inherent range.
All this is to say, the rifle, it's cartridge, it's scope and it's bases and rings are all part of a package. And each part must complement the other.
Now on to canted bases. Any decent scope maker will now tell you the total elevation travel in the scope specifications. Those numbers are expressed in MOA or MILS.
Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of less than 50 MOA (14 Mils) gets a 0 MOA Base Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 70 MOA (20 MILS) gets a 10 MOA Base (3 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 85 MOA (24 MILS) gets a 20 MOA Base (6 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 100 MOA (29 MILS) gets a 30 MOA Base (9 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of greater than 110 MOA (32 Mils) get a 40 MOA Base (12 MILS) or more.
I use rounded numbers in the above. And yes there are exceptions, and special purpose applications where deviating is necessary, but generally unless you know what your doing, the above works well and will not get you into trouble.
I've used the follow rough rule of thumb when considering how much base cant to use on a rifle. Much of course depends on your rifle and load. It's silly to use a 40 MOA base on a rifle that's meant to shoot 200 yds or less, even if the scope has enough the elevation adjustment to use a canted base. At the same time it's also silly to have a rifle, cartridge and scope capable of shooting 1,000 yds. and choking it down with a base and scope that won't let you utilize it's inherent range.
All this is to say, the rifle, it's cartridge, it's scope and it's bases and rings are all part of a package. And each part must complement the other.
Now on to canted bases. Any decent scope maker will now tell you the total elevation travel in the scope specifications. Those numbers are expressed in MOA or MILS.
Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of less than 50 MOA (14 Mils) gets a 0 MOA Base Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 70 MOA (20 MILS) gets a 10 MOA Base (3 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 85 MOA (24 MILS) gets a 20 MOA Base (6 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of Less than 100 MOA (29 MILS) gets a 30 MOA Base (9 Mils) Any Scope that has a Elevation travel of greater than 110 MOA (32 Mils) get a 40 MOA Base (12 MILS) or more.
I use rounded numbers in the above. And yes there are exceptions, and special purpose applications where deviating is necessary, but generally unless you know what your doing, the above works well and will not get you into trouble.
Some of the dumbest fhuqking schit I've ever seen. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Someone who "knows" and "does" as "much" as you,will always be best served by asking questions,rather than giving "answers". Hint.
Glass with the least erector travel,needs the most help.
Bless your heart for trying though.
Hint.
Laughing!.........................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Sugar tits poor poor sugar tits. Better off beating off ! If ever a song fit sugar tits that one nails your shît show center mass. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣https://youtu.be/RJOrwjj44Yc
Them that cain't break trail,simply must follow and relate their Melting Snowflake Routine...which is assuredly no "Act". Congratulations?!?
Only ordered (1) 40MOA rail yesterday and I reckon it'll do nice thangs for a 6x MQ aboard a SALAMI 22-250 and it's 3K fps+ 88gr Smooches.
Google it all.
Hint.
Bless your heart.
Laughing!..................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Don't pick on her,because she's doing her BEST. Hint. Laughing!
Oooooopsie!..............
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."