Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Attorney General Barr Gave Mueller Permission to Indict Trump’s Three Adult Children and J

A report at The Specator on Friday claims dirty cop Robert Mueller met with Attorney General Bob Barr and the two agreed that President Trump’s children should be indicted.
The report goes on to say that Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his 13 angry Democrats also want President Trump to be indicted but that Barr pushed back on this.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-three-adult-children-and-jared-kushner/

Well, there you have it, Barr is indeed going to indict people involved in Spygate, just not the ones that should be indicted.

So much for Barr being a White hat, and bringing justice back to Justice.

That barr would even meet with muler says everything anyone needs to know.

Fake news till it happens. Hasbeen

i wouldn't doubt it. i've said all along that kushner will be the downfall of trump. plus i think that trumps kids fugged up unintentionally early on. they did not know the law and frankly i doubt that even they believed that trump would win and therefore operated haphazardly unlike the professional politician sharks that he ran against who knew the ins and outs and had the deck stacked in their favor with the DOJ, etc al.

In reading the link, it looks like more fake news.....nobody has been indicted...

I said that too, the damn kids, and the jew need to sit down and STFU, let the Man, [Trump] do his Work!

I don't think they've done anything to warrant that and it would be a hard nut to crack this late in the game. I believe it's fake news. keep fishing.

If they, or anyone else, has committed one or more crimes, have at it.

That said, one would think that enough pure BS has been fabricated and then disproven in the last two years that intelligent people would wait just a bit before buying into any of it, but maybe that's giving some too much credit.

Personally, I think Barr should review the order that established the Mueller investigation to be sure that it meets DOJ regulations (it doesn't, according to some sources), and if doesn't, correct it or rescind it.

WTF.

We’ve had the Clinton crime family getting by with crimes for decades and others to numerous to list. This is what we get?

This. I heard Barr quashed it.

That rumor has been floating around for more than a week, I would take it with a grain of salt, a giant boulder sized grain.

Published March 9th.
https://spectator.us/mueller-barr-battle-indict-trump/

Where did you hear/read this?

Got a link?

Are you saying that an Attorney General can overrule a Special Council? If so, then what is the point of a Special Council investigating corruption if the DOJ can overrule?

Sounds fake but don't let that stop ya'll from wringing your hands and jerking your knees until something else comes along.

Stand by for at least five more threads regarding the same BS.

Yeah, I'll reserve judgment until the actual report is released.

BUT....I do believe that Trump and associates...kids, confidants, etc..........tried doing things like they were used to in the business world, being woefully ignorant that Washington is not the business world. Something that you can do in a business transaction often times will not fly in the world of politics. Trump should have left his kids in New York.

It's interesting that none of the major news organizations are reporting this. I found three organizations that are and all are using The Specator as the source. MSNBC, CNN, FOX, CBS, ABC, NBC all quiet as of this Sunday morning.

If true the democrats would be shouting this from the roof tops.
Barr can and should oversee the special council. Jeff Seasons downfall. He let the democrats trick him into recusal. Hasbeen

If Mueller has asked for permission to indict Trump, and Barr has denied permission to do so, Barr will be required by the law to give a detailed report to Congress about the denial. At this point it's just rumor and speculation but it might provide one possible explanation why the report hasn't been released yet.

I believe we should follow precedent: "At this point, what difference does it make?".