"If you think he — one man; any man — could save our nation on his own you are thinking an inch wide and an inch deep."
All sorts of things he could have done all on his own to make a huge dent in the globalist plan for our destruction. Hell, just one executive order eliminating birthright citizenship would have been monumental, and entirely within his inherent powers. Birthright citizenship isn't a law. It isn't a Supreme Court ruling. It's merely a policy that was adopted at some point by the INS. Explain why he didn't just do that?
The answer is only one of two things. In either case, we're screwed.
No decision or act or executive order, or presidential directive, which are short-sighted answers to bigger problems, are done in a political vacuum. Do you want another Dem “Obama” in the future and his completely unilateral, exec orders using Trump as a precedent to politically pay back? Trump has reversed over some hundred of Obama’s EO’s already. If he’d eliminate birthright citizenship, he’d be sued in a NY minute. Congress can even enact a law to override an EO if it proves politically unsavory; I wouldn’t put it above the seated, big-business R’s to go along with the Dem’s on something like that.
And I’m not defending Trump more than giving him more time; he may prove to be something other than I give him credit for at this time but in three years he has already placed 39 more conservative Federal judges some 17 in district courts along with initiating much better economic indicators. He has also done more internationally of substance than Obama could accomplish in a neighborhood meeting. And so on.
And he cannot stop a globalist movement by himself even if he can let the air out of the tire for awhile.
This stuff isn't complicated. But before you can understand it you have to give up any notions you may have about the American system of government.
Giving up is the only subject on which you are fluent. If I awakened each morning beset by the fears you guys profess in your every post I would leap on my tractor and mow the schidt out of something!
Politics and geo-strategy are complex topics but you will find a vlogger that will tell you what you want to hear and who you should blame.
mike r
Don't wish it were easier Wish you were better
Stab them in the taint, you can't put a tourniquet on that. Craig Douglas ECQC
From the article. "Despite these recent statements on the campaign trail, Americans might remember that Trump wasn’t always such a strong supporter of gun ownership. Before he was a presidential contender, he called out Republicans who “walk the NRA line” and “refuse even limited restrictions” on firearms laws, in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve. “I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun,” he wrote. At the time of his book’s publication, the real estate mogul was considering a bid for the presidency but hadn’t declared his intention to run."
From the article. "Despite these recent statements on the campaign trail, Americans might remember that Trump wasn’t always such a strong supporter of gun ownership. Beforehe was a presidential contender, he called out Republicans who “walk the NRA line” and “refuse even limited restrictions” on firearms laws, in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve. “I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun,” he wrote. At the time of his book’s publication, the real estate mogul was considering a bid for the presidency but hadn’t declared his intention to run."
Please note "Before".
Please note that was just about 20 years ago. Bunch of stuff has changed in my life in 20 years. You the same dude?
How about we get current and see what President (not land developer or casino owner) Trump has to say.
2019 NRA Speech.
"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
"If you think he — one man; any man — could save our nation on his own you are thinking an inch wide and an inch deep."
All sorts of things he could have done all on his own to make a huge dent in the globalist plan for our destruction. Hell, just one executive order eliminating birthright citizenship would have been monumental, and entirely within his inherent powers. Birthright citizenship isn't a law. It isn't a Supreme Court ruling. It's merely a policy that was adopted at some point by the INS. Explain why he didn't just do that?
The answer is only one of two things. In either case, we're screwed.
You are Wong. As in United States v. Wong Kim Ark:
...the Fourteenth Amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, in the allegiance and under the protection of the country, including all children here born of resident aliens, with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes. The Amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United States, of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 6a, "strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;" and his child, as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted, "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle."
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
"If you think he — one man; any man — could save our nation on his own you are thinking an inch wide and an inch deep."
All sorts of things he could have done all on his own to make a huge dent in the globalist plan for our destruction. Hell, just one executive order eliminating birthright citizenship would have been monumental, and entirely within his inherent powers. Birthright citizenship isn't a law. It isn't a Supreme Court ruling. It's merely a policy that was adopted at some point by the INS. Explain why he didn't just do that?
The answer is only one of two things. In either case, we're screwed.
If you guys are going to take such an active interest in politics, you should at least brush up on how the three branches of government function.
Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
You are Wong. As in United States v. Wong Kim Ark:
It's you who is Wong. That only applies to those giving birth here while lawfully in the US, and having "a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business." Illegals cannot be lawfully domiciled here, nor can they be lawfully carrying out business here. The ruling, in other words, was very narrowly circumscribed, such to exclude the vast majority of such claims.
