24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,387
L
Lennie Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
L
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,387
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/u...tional-rights/ar-AAGOCOB?ocid=spartandhp

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — The government's watchlist of more than 1 million people identified as "known or suspected terrorists" violates the constitutional rights of those placed on it, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

But the judge is seeking additional legal briefs before deciding what remedy to impose.
The plaintiffs said they were wrongly placed on the list and that the government's process for adding names is overbroad and riddled with errors.
The watchlist is disseminated to a variety of governmental departments, foreign governments and police agencies.
The FBI declined comment on the ruling Wednesday. In court, the FBI's lawyers argued that the difficulties suffered by the plaintiffs pale in comparison to the government's interests in combatting terrorism.
Gadeir Abbas, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, called the ruling a victory. He said he will be asking the judge to severely curtail how the government compiles and uses its list.
"Innocent people should be beyond the reach of the watchlist system," Abbas said. "We think that's what the Constitution requires."
Abbas said that while there has been significant litigation over the no-fly list, which forced the government to improve the process for people seeking to clear their name from the list, he said Trenga's ruling is the first to broadly attack the government's use of the watchlist. Trenga also wrote in his 31-page ruling that the case "presents unsettled issues."
Ultimately, Trenga ruled that the travel difficulties faced by plaintiffs — who say they were handcuffed at border crossings and frequently subjected to invasive secondary searches at airports — are significant, and that they have a right to due process when their constitutional rights are infringed.
He also said the concerns about erroneous placement on the list are legitimate.
"There is no evidence, or contention, that any of these plaintiffs satisfy the definition of a 'known terrorist," Trenga wrote. And the alternate standard for placement — that of a "suspected terrorist" — can easily be triggered by innocent conduct that is misconstrued, he said.
The watchlist, also known as the Terrorist Screening Database, is maintained by the FBI and shared with a variety of federal agencies. Customs officers have access to the list to check people coming into the country at border crossings, and aviation officials use the database to help form the no-fly list, which is a much smaller subset of the broader watchlist.
The watchlist has grown significantly over the years. As of June 2017, approximately 1.16 million people were included on the watchlist, according to government documents filed in the lawsuit. In 2013, the number was only 680,000. The vast majority are foreigners, but according to the government, there are roughly 4,600 U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents on the watchlist as of 2017.
Abbas argued at a court hearing earlier this year that the intrusions imposed on those listed are all for naught and that the list is worthless in terms of preventing terrorism. He noted that Omar Mateen, the man who shot and killed 49 people at an Orlando nightclub in 2016, was at one time on the list but was later removed from it. Others who have committed terrorist acts have never even been included on the watchlist.
The suit was filed in 2016, and has exposed previously unknown details about the list and how it is disseminated. In particular, government lawyers acknowledged after years of denials that more than 500 private entities are given access to the list. Government lawyers describe those private agencies as "law enforcement adjacent" and include university police forces, and security forces and hospitals, railroads and even animal-welfare organizations.
Abbas said the revelations about the government's actions have come after years of dismissive responses from government officials who accused CAIR and others of paranoia, and that people are now paying more attention to the civil-rights implications of watchlisting.
Earlier this year, the House of Representatives adopted a proposal from Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar that would force President Donald Trump's administration to disclose details about how it shares the watchlist with foreign countries.


In training to be an obedient master to my two labs

Shooting, fishing and hunting

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091
They are just making room for the NRA members to be listed as terrorist.

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
Likes: 2
B
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
B
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 79,321
Likes: 2
Half the schitt that goes on is unconstitutional.

We've been living in post constitutional America for quite some time.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,158
Likes: 2
R
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,158
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Half the schitt that goes on is unconstitutional.

We've been living in post constitutional America for quite some time.
No question..


Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69
Pro-Constitution.
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436
If you think the Constitution is a list of guarantees, it goes away. Unfortunately, it's more a list of things some guys felt were worth fighting for.

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
The Constitution is pretty much worthless these days.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,691
Likes: 15
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,691
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Half the schitt that goes on is unconstitutional.

We've been living in post constitutional America for quite some time.

Sadly, true.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,691
Likes: 15
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,691
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by 5thShock
If you think the Constitution is a list of guarantees, it goes away. Unfortunately, it's more a list of things some guys felt were worth fighting for.

Well said. Spot on.

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
The Constitution was an enigma and contradiction from the start. They fought a war, won it, and then ten years later started a government that did a lot of the things they said caused them to rebel against the king.

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 179
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 179
Red flag is unconstitutional right now.

IC B3

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,682
Likes: 1
N
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
N
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,682
Likes: 1
Who cares about the Constitution? If it’ll save one life...🤬


NRA Life,Endowment,Patron or Benefactor since '72.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
A taking without due process and no appeal? Hopefully a case will have to come before the Supreme Court and soon. I suspect such laws will have to be very carefully crafted as opposed to the single complaint versions being proposed.

Last edited by 1minute; 09/06/19.

1Minute
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Gadeir Abbas is a lawyer for CAIR


muslims have no rights as far as I'm concerned


Son of a liberal: " What did you do in the War On Terror, Daddy?"

Liberal father: " I fought the Americans, along with all the other liberals."

MOLON LABE





Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Gadeir Abbas is a lawyer for CAIR


muslims have no rights as far as I'm concerned
As I read it I was thinking the whole thing was about Muzzies and Mexicans...illegals who actually aren't entitled to the protections that citizens are. This won't apply to white citizens whose rights are routinely and egregiously violated.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,584
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,584
Quote
Does this mean red flag laws will be unconstitutional?


Not directly. This addresses secret lists with zero due process and red flag laws apply to individuals with at least a sham of due process.

However, it is an encouraging step in the right direction.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,382
7
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,382
Of course, they are unconstitutional and those responsible for their passage should face charges.
So should those that have enforced them.


Magna Carta was written about 800 years ago some of which the US constitution is based,
Are we a country of law or not?
Apparently not equally

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091

Red flag laws are unconstitutional.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Red flag laws will have to include due process or they will be ruled unconstitutional.


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."












Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,805
I think that they might be unconstitutional but not in the way that you guys are thinking. The process has long been used for protective orders and is constitutional. But with a protective order there is at least some sort of demonstrable threat or danger.

That former marine in Oregon just got red flagged for what was not a specific threat but rather a conditional statement and constitutionally protected speech.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,895
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,895
Not will be, are.


"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a U.S. president would raise an army to invade his own country."
Robert E. Lee
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

674 members (12344mag, 10Glocks, 160user, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 10ring1, 71 invisible), 2,707 guests, and 1,435 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,100
Posts18,483,097
Members73,959
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 1.397s Queries: 55 (0.007s) Memory: 0.9081 MB (Peak: 1.0277 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-02 01:13:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS