|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784 |
I am planning a trip to Africa. I have a set of 10x43 Pentax DCF SP, which are neat, my wife is travelling with me, and she may do some sightseeing, no hunting.
My question is Is it worth to upgrade binos for me and let her have mine or get her a pair of decent 6x32s or even 8x40s? She probably doesn't know one way or the other and I know PHs will be doing the judging and scouting and I will be behind the gun when it is time.
even though in the grand budget of things it seems that a pair of binos is not much, it would significantly increase the overall cost, or that money could go to taxidermy or to hunt another specimen.
Thanks
Last edited by Sponxx; 09/19/19.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104 |
If your current binocular works for you, I would suggest buying a glass for your wife and spending any additional money on equipment, clothing and other gear that might make the hunt more enjoyable for both of you.
Ben
Some days it takes most of the day for me to do practically nothing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,709
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,709 |
One trip we made had the whole family, my wife and three sons, going. I had two of my own so bought each of my sons Leupold Yosemite's that I gave $65 for (2012). They were fine.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784 |
If your current binocular works for you, I would suggest buying a glass for your wife and spending any additional money on equipment, clothing and other gear that might make the hunt more enjoyable for both of you. Exactly what I was thinking, wanted some input from people who have been there and done it. One trip we made had the whole family, my wife and three sons, going. I had two of my own so bought each of my sons Leupold Yosemite's that I gave $65 for (2012). They were fine. The Leupold Yosemite was just the one I was thinking about, small enough to be comfy and good enough that will eventually be helpful for me too and when my kids start hunting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 895
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 895 |
For just general purposes don't overlook the Nikon Monarch series. Very fine glass for the prices. If I didn't have several sets of Zeiss Classics in 10x40's and 8x30's, I'd be using the Nikon Pro Staff 7 8x30 or next step up Monarch 7 8x30.
As you stated, your PH will be responsible for the "judging" so your 10x are more than enough. May want to look at 8x for additional sets. 8x will give a wider field of view and if you're hunting in the brushier areas, the lower magnification can make it easier to define brush from horn and hide.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 726
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 726 |
what works for you now will work great for your wife.
i have been told by PH'S you job is to shoot, our job is to find you a trophy and get you close to shoot it.
so i have been leaving mine home. pocket camera with a lot of zoom works great. and you get pictures.
"Sorry don't get it done, Dude" John Wayne 1959
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
I wouldn't even consider leaving binocs behind. There's too much to see over there. I had the PH drop me off at a water hole after lunch while the crew liked to take a nap. I saw more birds, animals, etc to gawk at I can't imagine leaving them home. Sponxx, any good 8x42 or 8x32 would be my choice, and that's what I took. Not much long distance glassing really. Jacques and Danie both used the Swaro 8x30 SLC, older version with the focus ring on the wrong end.
Last edited by JGRaider; 09/20/19.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,455
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,455 |
I took a pair of Vortex Diamondback HD in 8x28 to Namibia last summer and was very happy with the performance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,871
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,871 |
Another vote for the Yosemite. It's lightweight and the 6x is really easy to hold steady
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 430
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 430 |
I used 10X42 EL Swarovski. Namibia is very open and a lot of animals were spotted at long range.I wouldn't take less than 10 power.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
Yes the Yosimite for your wife and your current pair for yourself. Go to Etoshapan Park if you have the time extremely beautiful and you can see all of the big five although Leopard are rarely spotted. The birding and wildlife viewing is part of what makes Africa unique. It is not a bad idea to have a back up but it is seldom needed. I have also loaned binos to the trackers who almost always spotted the game first with or with out binos.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,098
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,098 |
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117 |
The Pentax 10x42 you have is a GREAT binocular, no reason to change.It will work great.
Would also follow the advice of others on the Kowa vs. latest Leupold Yosemite.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754 |
I’ve been real happy with my 8x Monarch 5’s. Lots of reasonable priced glass out there now.
“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.” --- Will Rogers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998 |
When hunting the only thing I use binoculars for is to make sure the PH and I are on the same animal. I have a pair of 8x20 Zeiss that fit in my shirt pocket and are just the ticket. Mrs Blacktailer carries my 10x so those are nearby but I have honestly never used them when hunting. As others stated I would not go without binoculars but your PH is going to judge trophy size and you are there to get on the sticks and pull the trigger. For sightseeing and photo safari you and your wife can share the 10X.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,338
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,338 |
Your Pentax will serve you well there. If I were to change, it would be for something a bit more compact, but there's really no reason to deviate from what you have.
..."I will not tip toe through life, to meet death safely."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,672
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,672 |
Sounds like you have it figured out. Just a suggestion but forget the taxidermy. Take lots of photos. The money you would have spend on taxidermy use for another animal. Or better yet as a down payment on your next trip over.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
Agree on the trophy advice. If you do take anything back it is best to just take the skull cap/base of horns and remove horns if they will come off or separate along the skull suture and see if it is legal to bring back as baggage. A full bag of trophies will equal the cost of another safari pretty quickly.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 330
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 330 |
For any/all hunting trips, including Africa (especially for the open country in Namibia) get a very good range finding bino. Let your wife use the Pentax bino. If the cost is a stretch, then forgo the taxidermy AND the possible extra animal to fund the alpha bino/rangefinder combo. At least that's what I'd do. The Swarovski EL Range in 10x42 is excellent. Your PH may, or may not, have a range finder. His job is to find you a good trophy and get you close, but they don't always call out the range for the shot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,784 |
The Pentax 10x42 you have is a GREAT binocular, no reason to change.It will work great.
Would also follow the advice of others on the Kowa vs. latest Leupold Yosemite.
I ordered the 6x30 Kowa's. That was actually in the short list of small magnification binos I had perused a while back, when thinking what binos to get for my kids.
|
|
|
|
120 members (450yukon, 260Remguy, 300_savage, 6MMWASP, 2ndwind, 14 invisible),
1,701
guests, and
989
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,756
Posts18,476,379
Members73,942
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|