|
|
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 112
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 112 |
I have been playing around with a couple of my rifles and reduced loads and have a question. One of the rifles is a .243 that I'm shooting 80 grain bullets through with the H-4895 powder. Using the maximum reloading book load times .6 as a starting load. Velocity spread is pretty wild, like one hundred fifty feet per second between shots. Using CCI BR-2 primers. Would it be safe and would it narrow the velocity spread if I switched to magnum primers? Anyone tried this before? Thanks for your opinions. BCM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 365
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 365 |
I don't own a chronograph, but magnum primers have eliminated unexplained flyers in several of my light 4895 loads over the years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 112
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 112 |
eric1186, thanks for the information. That's what I wanted to hear. BCM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,820
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,820 |
I've used the CCI 250 with much success in reduced 308 loads with 4198. I suggest trying them with your light 4895 loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,734
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,734 |
I use Magnum primers is all reduced loads. Especially in Magnum cartridges.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,743 |
I haven't had the need to use magnum primers in reduced loads...
and when I've experimented to see if they help with accuracy, can't recall any powder I had any real gains in accuracy at 100 yds... of course all rifle barrels are an entity unto their own...
I do see a lot less problems with reduced loads using 4198, compared to H4895....
I also see a lot fewer problems, if any at substituting it with IMR 4895....
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,688 |
I tried the reduced recoil loads and what I eventually deduced was that a max load in a reduced cartridge ended up with the same recoil and killed just as well if not better. Furthermore pressures were at levels that the brass would always make a proper seal in the chamber whereas I experienced reduced loads not making a proper seal.
I'm since not a fan of reduced recoil loads and am a fan of reducing the cartridge instead. Brass, powder, bullets and chambers are designed to work best at pressure! JME your mileage may vary.
Trystan
Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,800 |
Reduced loads work well in the big bores. The 458 is a bit excessive for piggies but good with cast at just under 1,600fps. And the 405gn subsonic (Trailboss) will even bowl over the bunnies.
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk. That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied. Well?
|
|
|
|
217 members (10Glocks, 12344mag, 160user, 2500HD, 1eyedmule, 2UP, 17 invisible),
1,685
guests, and
1,006
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,388
Posts18,469,804
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|