24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Contrary to internet lore, the Python is a VERY strong revolver. Back in the day, everyone knew if you wanted a .357 that can take a solid diet of nothing but .357, you buy a Colt I frame. The Python is every bit as tough as an N frame S&W .357.
lmao

Yeah, that would be a bit of an exaggeration, I think.
Back when the only .357’s were made by Colt or S&W this was true. The 19 & 27 both had some issues that the Colts didn’t have.
And the Colt's had MORE issues that the Smith's didn't have. The Python has always been known to have a delicate action. The Trooper Mk.III was supposed to be an improvement, which IMO it was, but nobody really liked anything about the new Troopers other than the cheaper price compared to the Python.

Python's have typically, a great trigger right out of the box. Some Smith's have too, but especially during the Bangor-Punta era, this was not always the case. The Python's trigger is two-stage and different from a Smith's. Both have the potential to be glass-smooth. HawkI is spot-on when he talks about speed records.

The Python got its rep mainly from guys buying it because it looked cool. Secondly, it is just the right size for a .357. Overall, almost anybody will conclude the Smith is the better gun, whether it be K, L or N frame. Saying the Colt is as strong as an N frame Smith is freaking laughable.

I like you Kevin and you do bring some stuff to the table, but stupid shixt like this is why Ronald Reagan said of our liberal "friends" "they know so much that simply is not true,".

As a factory trained armorer for both S&W and Colt, I'll stick with my own assessment.

GB1

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jwp475


I'd like to know what problem the S&W M27 had other than poor quality control during the Banger Punta ownership era. The M27 was the flag shop model f S&W with checkered top, great attention to detail and over strong for a 357
Since you weren't rude, I'll answer your post.

The most common issues with the 27 are timing...yes, timing. The weight of the 27's cylinder caused it to skip past the locking bolts when the revolver gets worn. Its not an uncommon problem at all. I have corrected timing on a lot of S&W 27's and 28's. The other common "issue" (for some) that still remains is the .38 special length cylinder. Not much fun if you want to push heavy bullets out of a .357 case.


More info I should have added. N frame .357's and .38's are commonly found with peen'd cylinder bolts. Damaged and rounded cylinder bolts. Sometimes even peened frames at the cylinder bolt window. "Fixing" N frame timing sometimes file work and a complete reblue.

Last edited by GunGeek; 01/04/20.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
Ethan, no need to be rude; can't we keep it civil JUST ONCE????

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
Still cant run the 358429 through a Python.

I've seen a 28 out of time; the bolt notches had considerable battering. Smiths also have some lateral cylinder slack (fore and aft) that develops to a greater degree as the gun wears. Colts generally stay tight here.

Elgin Gates rated the Python higher for durability over the Smith 27, but I personally I havent had any issues shooting any 28, 27, Python or original Troopers. I dont think any have service life issues unless they are shot a ton.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Ethan, no need to be rude; can't we keep it civil JUST ONCE????
Happy New Year.

IC B2

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by HawkI
Still cant run the 358429 through a Python.
Now that I didn't know; thanks. The only gun I have ever used a 358429 in was a .38/44 Heavy Duty; because lighter bullets just wouldn't shoot to point of aim.

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,838
H
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,838
IMHO back in the old days the Python got its reputation because they had decent triggers and shot well ( and were easy to shoot well).
This pre internet where everybody sends everything off to a 'smith for custom work.

Back then, for many, what you bought, was all you got.

Pops sent his first one to the Custom Shop for a trigger job.
It is a light DA and SA is scary.

Have shot factory new Pythons and while nice, some I found merely tolerable.
They all weren't wonderful, or even good.

His 8" stainless I think "meh" but he runs it in SA for IHMSA.
Actually, after a few yrs he retired it and runs a 686 pre lock 8 3/8 w Millet rear sight swap.

Yeah, Pythons look good.
Life is too short to shoot ugly guns.

While I shoot the 8" well, I like a 6" better, and prefer blued. Never cared for the 4" or shorter Pythons.
Hated Trooper MKIII

I don't target shoot anymore, or even plink. I'll burn a few and it's time to go hunting.
A stainless 6" for $1500 sounds like a doable deer killer.

Definitely change the grips, the new Python's factory wood contour I did not like.
Don't know if the old Hogue rubber Python grips will fit on the new Python.

Last edited by hookeye; 01/04/20.
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,838
H
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 17,838
BTW, was watching TGS on Roku last night.
The shotgun kid was at some Euro version of SHOT.

Found a .410 revolver shotgun and what does he (or his buddy) do?
Spin the cylinder and while turning, flick to close.

How many did that to old Smith and Colt revolvers?

The timing issues/lockup, from normal use or accelerated wear from being silly?

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by HawkI
Still cant run the 358429 through a Python.
Now that I didn't know; thanks. The only gun I have ever used a 358429 in was a .38/44 Heavy Duty; because lighter bullets just wouldn't shoot to point of aim.

That's the gun the bullet was designed for.

Rugers, the 19, 86s and probably the New Service will handle it in 357.

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
P
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
P
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
HEY ALL...if ya wanna shoot the 358429 in a Python or any other short cylinder .357 (M27 M28 etc..) just trim the 357 cases to 1.25"...also I drop any max load by 1/2 grain....
wonderfully accurate that way....
pete

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 5
Is the python as short cylindered as the king cobra? I have 158gr lswc loads that run out of all sorts of .357’s, including a smith m760 that won’t work in the colt.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
Same cylinder length.

I dont know of any 158/160 design crimped in the uppermost groove that seats out past the cylinder face.

38 cases work fine for 358429 bullets in shorter cylinder 357 guns.

Last edited by HawkI; 01/04/20.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,674
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by HawkI
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by HawkI
Still cant run the 358429 through a Python.
Now that I didn't know; thanks. The only gun I have ever used a 358429 in was a .38/44 Heavy Duty; because lighter bullets just wouldn't shoot to point of aim.

That's the gun the bullet was designed for.

Rugers, the 19, 86s and probably the New Service will handle it in 357.
Really? I thought it was the Remington load with the Phil Sharpe 158. I thought the 158429 was conceived in the early ‘30’s.

I’ll trust your memory over mine.

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
The 358429 was designed for the 38/44, I think in 1927.

The H&G 51 was designed for the 357.

Edited; Keith designed the 358429 in 1929, but didn't send it to Lyman for several years later, according to Sixguns.

It was introduced before the 357 Magnum in 1935.

Last edited by HawkI; 01/04/20.
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 26
G
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
G
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 26
LOL told you people last month about this. Nobody listens. Some real funny posts here. Have had my 6in 2020 python for almost a month now and it is nice. Trigger pull is better than my old pythons both in SA and DA. Have to try it to understand.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
Been watching some YouTubes on it. Looks like a winner. Likely a lot better than the current crop of S&W revolvers.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
And no lock!

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
P
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
P
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
HEY ALL...Its not that rosy a picture for the new Pythons....over at the colt forum there is a thread re the new colt python problems...
seems there are more than a few that left the factory with improperly cut rough counter bored muzzle crowns.....inexcusable at that price point.... and their turnaround times are horrendous.....
Pete

Last edited by pdman; 01/10/20. Reason: added info
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by TimZ
And no lock!

Yep, and no barrel sleeves.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,927
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by pdman
HEY ALL...Its not that rosy a picture for the new Pythons....over at the colt forum there is a thread re the new colt python problems...
seems there are more than a few that left the factory with improperly cut rough counter bored muzzle crowns.....inexcusable at that price point.... and their turnaround times are horrendous.....
Pete

Might have to give them a few months to get their act 100% straight on them.

Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

553 members (222ND, 1badf350, 1OntarioJim, 257Bob, 24HourCampFireGuy50, 2500HD, 56 invisible), 2,459 guests, and 1,296 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,904
Posts18,518,553
Members74,020
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.116s Queries: 55 (0.023s) Memory: 0.9105 MB (Peak: 1.0280 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-17 18:58:13 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS