HEY Y'ALL...Here is the muzzle of #2979...it is NOT mine...highest serial # i have seen to date...it sure seems that it is a crapshoot if you lay down your $$$ for one of these first release pythons....caveat emptor...pete
Colt is fixing those as fast as they come in...quickly. But you're right. Waiting a little till the dust settles is probably best (and cheaper). I'll be getting a 4.25" later, towards the end of the year. Supposedly the problems with the crown have to do with the fixture holding the revolver while it's being polished. That has been addressed in this next batch. Haven't heard yet what Colt's fix is for the cycling issue. Best place to read about the Python and its teething problems is the Colt forum. The thread there is approaching 200 pages. Bob
From the point of a collector, regardless of condition, a low serial number revolver is worth it... You can sort out the flaws later. Once you're into the 4 digits, it no longer makes any sense at all. My personal policy for defense handguns is, they have to be in service for a minimum of 5 years before I'll carry one...that's just me and most don't agree with me on that.
A revolver is quite another thing though. I don't consider revolvers defensive guns anymore, so for me it's a pure sporting gun. Therefore, I'm willing to take a little more risk, but in the case of the new Python, I personally will be quite happy to wait a year while all the eager beavers beta test them for me.
For those bashing Colt, might I remind you of S&W's first attempt at the L frame...And it was just a SLIGHTLY up-sized K frame with most parts being interchangeable.
I find it interesting how Mark Keefe bashed the old Python by comparing it to the new and the VP just smiled. The VP looks old enough to have been around when the older Pythons were still being made and probably touted the amazing traits of that gun back then like there wasn't anything wrong.
I find it interesting how Mark Keefe bashed the old Python by comparing it to the new and the VP just smiled. The VP looks old enough to have been around when the older Pythons were still being made and probably touted the amazing traits of that gun back then like there wasn't anything wrong.
Thanks, Dinny
That 'peter leech' keefe is a paid shill, anyone trashing an old Python, especially in front of someone that currently draws his pay from Colt both need kicked in the balls, I had a 4" blue back in the day, one of those never should have sold it deals, I miss it.
I'm willing to cut Colt some slack...A new Python is a seriously ballsey move these days. Just remember what Colt is doing...
They got OUT of the revolver market. All the old revolver guys retired. And then Colt decided to get back into the revolver market. So they're "growing them all new" in regards to their revolver people.
They don't REALLY make revolvers (their numbers are LOW), and they decided to tackle the finest US made DA revolver ever! Talk about jumping into the deep end; Good LAWD!! I'd say Colt's engineers have some HUGE cajone's.
I'm feeling kinda confident Colt will get this all worked out.
I'm willing to cut Colt some slack...A new Python is a seriously ballsey move these days. Just remember what Colt is doing...
They got OUT of the revolver market. All the old revolver guys retired. And then Colt decided to get back into the revolver market. So they're "growing them all new" in regards to their revolver people.
They don't REALLY make revolvers (their numbers are LOW), and they decided to tackle the finest US made DA revolver ever! Talk about jumping into the deep end; Good LAWD!! I'd say Colt's engineers have some HUGE cajone's.
I'm feeling kinda confident Colt will get this all worked out.
First of all, I'm guessing that the majority wouldn't say the Python is the finest US made DA revolver ever. Secondly, it's a PINO. From everything I've read, more of a King Cobra mocked up to look like a Python. Thirdly, Colt has done nothing but fail as of late, so why would you be confident they'll get any of it worked out. Once again, it reminds me of a Taurus Judge. A good concept but much better if the end result actually worked.
Hey, it's a new era. S&W hs their share of f uck ups too. I mean that whole barrel misalignment issue was a real fiasco and the new ones with the un-pinned barrel and non-recessed chambers, well....
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”