Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Ultimate proof of creation

And here I had him figured for a proctologist!

Well, OK, let's see what Karl Popper had to say on Evolution:

What we call the evolutionary hypothesis is an explanation of a host of biological and paleontological observations—for instance, of certain similarities between various species and genera—by the assumption of common ancestry of related forms.

. . . I see in modern Darwinism the most successful explanation of the relevant facts. [Popper, 1957, p. 106]

There exists no law of evolution, only the historical fact that plants and animals change, or more precisely, that they have changed. [Popper, 1963b, p. 340]

I have always been extremely interested in the theory of evolution and very ready to accept evolution as a fact. [Popper, 1976, p. 167;]

The Mendelian underpinning of modern Darwinism has been well tested and so has the theory of evolution which says that all terrestrial life has evolved from a few primitive unicellular organisms, possibly even from one single organism. [Popper, 1978, p. 344;

''Furthermore, in his book, Objective Knowledge, where he uses the Darwinian paradigm as a basis for his own theory of knowledge, Popper not only discusses Darwinism at length as a scientific explanation but offers as an additional component a scientific hypothesis of his own—genetic dualism—which is intended to strengthen the orthodox neo-Darwinian framework (Popper, 1972, ''

Sorta grotesque. Too much tits and too hard looking. Tits need a little give. GOD created her and man mutilated her. Rather have 'em natural.

I notice that you conveniently fail to quote his criticism of neo-Darwinian theory. It created a firestorm at the time. Here is one summary of what Popper said:

Abstract: Karl Popper argued in 1974 that evolutionary theory contains no testable laws and is therefore a metaphysical research program. Four years later, he said that he had changed his mind. Here we seek to understand Popper’s initial position and his subsequent retraction. We argue, contrary to Popper’s own assessment, that he did not change his mind at all about the substance of his original claim. We also explore how Popper’s views have ramifications for contemporary discussion of the nature of laws and the structure of evolutionary theory. – Popper’s Shifting Appraisal of Evolutionary Theory, Mehmet Elgin and Elliott Sober
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2017 7:1, 31-55

Just for fun, can any of you prove to us that YOU exist? If you do exist, can you prove who you are?

fixt

That proves you to be a liar, but I know you don't mind. Your kind never do.

.[/quote]

People are alive who were blind like you, and now some can see. But, geniuses, like you, can be blind and still tell people who have learned to see, what things really look like? Right.

You just keep on telling folks who have seen both sides of life that both sides of the coin look the same as the only side you have seen. You dont even have the intelligence to comprehend what I'm saying.

Go ask a deaf person what a meadowlark sounds like.

A Christian has a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. If there were no Jesus Christ it would be impossible for a relationship to exist.

Youre too stupid to realize some on this earth experience things you dont, or you're pissed off about it and attack Believers and Christ because you aren't so blessed.

You're too stupid to consider some people may have prayers answered, regardless whether you do or not.

HE said the prayer of a righteous man availeth much. You lie. Not Him. [/quote]

That's not a rational argument. You are preaching in a defensive manner. It only fools those who are of the same mind, defending their faith.

It's quite understandable.[/quote]

Doc went off the rails about 3 years ago.

That's about when he started loosing his ability to make rational arguments. He hasn't been the same since. [/quote]

Jag-off is a Doc? You're joking right? I wouldn't see him for an in grown hair!
[/quote]

Yes,
Doc, as in Doctor of Optometry.

Don't worry, I doubt you would ever have to see him. I imagine your insurance is way to good. His patience are all welfare cases.[/quote]

And here I had him figured for a proctologist!
[/quote]

If you were smart, that would give you a clue as to how smart you are.

AS, I guess you think it's pure genius that scientists presumed the ordered arrangement present in life on earth came about from an explosion which causes destruction and disorder.

I guess they decided any explanation was better than accepting that like and order came from a creator.

Its evident any with your tendencies couldnt let that get past them.

Of course, you're so smart, you understand what others have experienced, even if they dont, sucker.

Just look at the perfection of the human hand as proof of God's existence:

The thumb, able to oppose any of the fingers.
The pinky, just the right size to clean out your ear.
The index finger, just the right size to pick your nose.
And two more fingers - one for getting married, and one for getting divorced.

Without which we would have never shot a gun or flown to the moon, or eaten bowl of peach ice cream.

…13For You formed my inmost being; You knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Marvelous are Your works, and I know this very well. 15My frame was not hidden from You when I was made in secret, when I was woven together in the depths of the earth.…

Yep, woven together fearfully and wonderfully. Hell of an explosion, huh?

In our likeness, and not the likeness of animals, but with a spirit, everlasting.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth…

Or the [bleep]'s hand.

Or the elephant's trunk,

Or...or...

If God exists, what would any of that have to do with it?

It’s a damn good day to be alive and living in the US, no matter how fuuucked the liberals try to make it!!!!

Seven Nobel Laureates who doubt Darwin....

https://uncommondescent.com/intelli...-design-or-attacked-darwinian-evolution/

No thanks. I still prefer the hand. I can still peel nuts with the best of them and shoot a gun.

Why would God choose to look like an evolved primate (namely us) with vestigial organs like an appendix, wisdom tooth problems caused by the face shortening, back problems caused by incomplete evolution from quadripedalism, and an inner ear incapable of hearing prayers beyond a short distance and from more than a few people at a time? Especially since God, so the story goes, had not invented those life forms yet.

Indeed, if God wanted to create the universe, about the worst form imaginable would be to look like Homo sapiens or any other animal. Not to mention the susceptibility of "our likeness" to radiation, zero air pressure, temperature extremes, and other things that God, for some reason, put into the reaches of space if indeed God was there to create them.

Christianity would be more credible if it would shed the stone age myths of pre-literate people and concentrate on the central message.

we are the result of evolution this far.. but we are still evoloving more to come just wait another billion years... dumb asses.

I have all the proof I need.

Do you believe in talking snakes?

Do you not?