24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
M
MtnT Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
I have a couple boxs of 30cal 190 accubonds
And a whole bunch of social distancing time

What powder should I use for my invention
I tried r17 and got good velocity but erratic accuracy


In the cupboard on hand I have
R19
Big Game
V550
R17
Varget

I have a 20" barrel, shoots 1/2-3/4" groups w hornady factory ammo

A 20" 6.5 shoots 140g at 2600fps or so

Looking for that or faster w the 190's

What do you think?

GB1

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,639
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,639
Originally Posted by MtnT
I have a couple boxs of 30cal 190 accubonds
And a whole bunch of social distancing time

What powder should I use for my invention
I tried r17 and got good velocity but erratic accuracy


In the cupboard on hand I have
R19
Big Game
V550
R17
Varget

I have a 20" barrel, shoots 1/2-3/4" groups w hornady factory ammo

A 20" 6.5 shoots 140g at 2600fps or so

Looking for that or faster w the 190's

What do you think?


Do you mean 180 grain? If so, I'm a fan of Superformance. However it's not one you listed. Of those, I'd try Varget next.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,508
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,508
"30-06 creedmore"

Good God, man! Saddling the great 30-06 with that label is like making Sophia Loren twerk.


"Live like you'll die tomorrow, but manage your grass like you'll live forever."
-S. M. Stirling
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 977
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 977
I load 190 gr. Hornady BTSP (discontinued) with H4350 and am pushing 2800. R-17 or V-550 ought to get you past 2600 without a problem.

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,553
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,553
A burn rate approximating the 4350s should be right for a 180-190 grain bullet in the 30-06. So, RL-17 is the place I would start. I'm getting over 2,750 fps in my Bergara 30-06 with 24" barrel shooting 180 grain Partitions over 56 grains of H 4350. Pressure is below max, and accuracy is excellent.


NRA Endowment Life Member, G.O.A supporter
IC B2

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,034
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,034
Originally Posted by Theo Gallus
"30-06 creedmore"

Good God, man! Saddling the great 30-06 with that label is like making Sophia Loren twerk.


LOL, would you watch??



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 10,135
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 10,135
Is there a powder called "Pink Dot"?

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,254
Campfire Savant
Online Content
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,254
I think you are in to something

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,436
Twerk? This is a sex change. An abomination from a sick mind mired in filth.

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
what the hell is your invention, you never described it. Also, if you invented(I use the term loosly) a .30 cal. Crudmoor,You don't need to call it .30-06 Crudmoor, just call it .30 Crudmoor. I agree with Theo Gallus. Don't saddle the venerable .30-06 with such slander as that. Next thing you'll be telling us you invented a .270 Crudmoor, then I'd be pissed for sure, LOL!!!


What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
IC B3

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,278
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,278
I'm thinking alcohol was involved in the making of this thread... smile

As to the 190 LRAB, I'd stick with RL17. I'd start with a below max charge and work up. I'd play around with seating depths.

Also, it wouldn't surprise me if ultimately your particular 30-06 just doesn't like the 190 LRAB...


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Seriously, all jokes aside, I've used RL,-17 a lot in smaller cases with great results. But I don't think it's quite the same as 4350. When it first came out it was described to me that you could pretty safely use 4350 data to begin working up a load, but things changed somewhat as you went along.

For one thing, I've heard that it is somewhat in the league with Superformance Powders in that It is not like most powders because it contains its inhibitors within the powder formula and not just dusted on the outside of the grains as in most powders. I was told this contributes to a slower pressure curve and it has less of a pressure peak. This is what I've been told. I'm no chemist and you can take all this with a grain of salt and do your own research. I called Alliant and spoke with a customer service rep and told him what I had been told. He wouldn't deny any of it but thanked me for the info.

However, upon the advice of a friend who had used it in his 6mm Remington with great results, I worked up a load with it for my .250 Savage. I got tremendous results with really great velocities with no visible signs of pressure. Also note that this was with 115 grain bullets, not 100s. However I did find that I was a bit over pressure when I went to reprime the cases and found that this load had loosened the primer pockets. At that powder charge it was expanding the case heads.

I destroyed those cases and loaded new ones dropping the charge a couple grains lower. Then worked it up again slowly (This took around six months because I was being very cautious and also it was a wet year and I couldn't always get to my range when it rained too much.). I got it up to 1 grain less than before with no signs of pressure and no problem with primer pocket expansion and called that good. I found I still got fantastic velocity and good accuracy with no signs of excessive pressure and the primer pockets didn't expand noticeably. That was good enough for me.

For safety sake I won't list my powder charge or velocity here in case my results are a fluke, because I have a 26" barrel and my chamber has a long throat. It's on a Howa 1500 action which I believe has a longer Magazine than a Remington short action so I have more room to seat bullets longer which gives me more powder capacity without excessive pressure. I'll just say it puts the already excellent little .250 Savage in a bit higher class even with the heavier bullets.

Those are my results with RL-17 in a .250 Savage and I had reasonably good results wth it in my .257 AI but I don't know how well it works in longer, higher capacity cases such as a .270 or .06. Proceed at your own risk, LOL!

Last edited by Filaman; 03/20/20.

What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,278
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,278
Filman, I've used RL17 to good effect in the 6.5 CM, 7-08, 270, and 300 WSM.

My opinion is, like RL26 and Big Game, many run RL17 powder too "hard."

In the 300 WSM for instance, my "go-to" load was 64.0 H4350 with a 180 @ 2,980 fps. I found that RL17 was at its best with 64.5 gr's with a 180 for 3,030 fps. One can go a bit highert higher, but I felt beyond 65.0 was over-pressure.

Basically, I think you can add .08% +/- to your book H4350 load to arrive at a viable, sane RL17 load.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
M
MtnT Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
Sorry to slander the 30-06

We have a 3% infection rate in my town BTW, maybe that effected my judgement

Anyway....

I am shooting a browning BOSS,
So I build a load then adjust the BOSS, I use a suppressor instead of the weight

With the best BOSS settings I will get 2-3 that group cloverleaf then a flier 2”-3” out
Then I adjust the BOSS again
This is w R17

They are indeed 190g LRAB bullets

Wondering if the Rifle doesn’t like the bullet
Or if the R17 is causing the unpredictable fliers
OAL is 3.37


Last edited by MtnT; 03/20/20.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,741
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,741
The Nosler loading site is showing 54.5 grs. of R17 with their 190 LRAB for about 2750 fps from a 24" barrel. So you might get 2600+fps outa the 20" barrel.

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
M
MtnT Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 134
I am getting plenty of velocity, North of 2700fps

Just wondering why 2-3 touching; then one in left field

It’s not the rifle

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by Brad
Filman, I've used RL17 to good effect in the 6.5 CM, 7-08, 270, and 300 WSM.

My opinion is, like RL26 and Big Game, many run RL17 powder too "hard."

In the 300 WSM for instance, my "go-to" load was 64.0 H4350 with a 180 @ 2,980 fps. I found that RL17 was at its best with 64.5 gr's with a 180 for 3,030 fps. One can go a bit highert higher, but I felt beyond 65.0 was over-pressure.

Basically, I think you can add .08% +/- to your book H4350 load to arrive at a viable, sane RL17 load.

Originally Posted by Brad
Filman, I've used RL17 to good effect in the 6.5 CM, 7-08, 270, and 300 WSM.

My opinion is, like RL26 and Big Game, many run RL17 powder too "hard."

In the 300 WSM for instance, my "go-to" load was 64.0 H4350 with a 180 @ 2,980 fps. I found that RL17 was at its best with 64.5 gr's with a 180 for 3,030 fps. One can go a bit highert higher, but I felt beyond 65.0 was over-pressure.

Basically, I think you can add .08% +/- to your book H4350 load to arrive at a viable, sane RL17 load.

Thanks for the reply to my post Brad, that's good to know. I don't think RL-17 will do what it did in my .250 in many other cartridges. For instance, it didn't have quite the same effect in my .257 AI. It did good but nothing spectacular. But in my friend's 6mm and my .250 it was sort of over and beyond without the excess pressure.

Last edited by Filaman; 03/20/20.

What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
Originally Posted by Filaman
what the hell is your invention, you never described it. Also, if you invented(I use the term loosly) a .30 cal. Crudmoor,You don't need to call it .30-06 Crudmoor, just call it .30 Crudmoor. I agree with Theo Gallus. Don't saddle the venerable .30-06 with such slander as that. Next thing you'll be telling us you invented a .270 Crudmoor, then I'd be pissed for sure, LOL!!!
.................Yep! A 6.5 Creed necked up to a 30 cal.......To the OP. Invention? Well go for it since you now have a lot of time on your hands.

Similar to the 308 a little? Have fun.


28 Nosler,,,,300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger


Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
Originally Posted by bigsqueeze
Originally Posted by Filaman
what the hell is your invention, you never described it. Also, if you invented(I use the term loosly) a .30 cal. Crudmoor,You don't need to call it .30-06 Crudmoor, just call it .30 Crudmoor. I agree with Theo Gallus. Don't saddle the venerable .30-06 with such slander as that. Next thing you'll be telling us you invented a .270 Crudmoor, then I'd be pissed for sure, LOL!!!
.................Yep! A 6.5 Creed necked up to a 30 cal.......To the OP. Invention? Well go for it since you now have a lot of time on your hands.

Similar to the 308 a little? Have fun.


Wouldn’t it be the .30 Thompson Center?

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 238
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 238
What about RL-16? Just for the fact that it's more temp stable and possibly less erratic? Is it too far away from RL-17 as far as burn rate?


God Bless and Shoot Straight
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

623 members (1936M71, 222Sako, 2500HD, 10gaugeman, 1beaver_shooter, 66 invisible), 2,578 guests, and 1,334 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,715
Posts18,475,585
Members73,941
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.172s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8973 MB (Peak: 1.0525 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 22:49:46 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS