We most likely have the biggest POS governor in the entire country. Dumber then a box of Rocks. Probably has to be dressed and spoon fed .
A little more then 200 covid deaths in a state with 10 million population.
200 and counting......
One certainly has the right to protest, but need to stay 6'+ apart. as for re-opening the economy, until an effective vaccine is developed, tested, produced and widely distributed, the risk of re-ignition of Covid-19 is present (do we really want to repeat the past 2 months again?).
Oh boy,,, you fell for it too.. In 6 months people won’t remember this chit. And vaccine uh ok,,, even if they do come up with one, people won’t get it..
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
How many e-mails have you, your friends, and family sent to elected officials?
Oh when they come after my guns and piss on my 2d amendment right I will show them. Pry from my dead cold hands yeah! 2 hours later cops on guys door step, sir we need your firearms. Guy uh ok here they are..
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
We most likely have the biggest POS governor in the entire country. Dumber then a box of Rocks. Probably has to be dressed and spoon fed .
A little more then 200 covid deaths in a state with 10 million population.
200 and counting......
One certainly has the right to protest, but need to stay 6'+ apart. as for re-opening the economy, until an effective vaccine is developed, tested, produced and widely distributed, the risk of re-ignition of Covid-19 is present (do we really want to repeat the past 2 months again?).
Vaccine already has a name issued by the CDC . . . .Scamdemic-19
We most likely have the biggest POS governor in the entire country. Dumber then a box of Rocks. Probably has to be dressed and spoon fed .
A little more then 200 covid deaths in a state with 10 million population.
200 and counting......
One certainly has the right to protest, but need to stay 6'+ apart. as for re-opening the economy, until an effective vaccine is developed, tested, produced and widely distributed, the risk of re-ignition of Covid-19 is present (do we really want to repeat the past 2 months again?).
Vaccine already has a name issued by the CDC . . . .Scamdemic-19
For lowly sum of $1000 you can save grandpa joe
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
We most likely have the biggest POS governor in the entire country. Dumber then a box of Rocks. Probably has to be dressed and spoon fed .
A little more then 200 covid deaths in a state with 10 million population.
200 and counting......
One certainly has the right to protest, but need to stay 6'+ apart. as for re-opening the economy, until an effective vaccine is developed, tested, produced and widely distributed, the risk of re-ignition of Covid-19 is present (do we really want to repeat the past 2 months again?).
Vaccine already has a name issued by the CDC . . . .Scamdemic-19
For lowly sum of $1000 you can save grandpa joe
why the heck would you want to?...………… Oh! grandpa joe, I thought you said Uncle Joe!
the consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded. Robert E Lee ~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
Dumber then a box of Rocks. Probably has to be dressed and spoon fed .
Do you honestly believe this?
Obviously you meant “than” but do you really believe that an incredibly dumb person somehow got himself elected governor of a US state and is pulling off an astonishing power grab that the people of the state are unwilling or unable to stop?
A ruling by SCOTUS had said that the First Amendment right to assemble applied Only to Federal Law in prohibiting the right by Congress in US Vs Cruikshank. The Ruling:
The first amendment to the Constitution prohibits Congress from abridging 'the right of the people to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.' This, like the other amendments proposed and adopted at the same time, was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens, but to operate upon the National government alone. Barron v. The City of Baltimore, 7 Pet. 250; Lessee of Livingston v. Moore, id. 551; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 434; Smith v. Maryland, 18 id. 76; Withers v. Buckley, 20 id. 90; Pervear v. The Commonwealth, 5 Wall. 479; Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 id. 321; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 id. 557. It is now too late to question the correctness of this construction. As was said by the late Chief Justice, in Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 325, 'the scope and application of these amendments are no longer subjects of discussion here.' They left the authority of the States just where they found it, and added nothing to the already existing powers of the United States.
According to the ruling the 1st Amendment right to assemble applies only to redress and assembly regarding Federal issues as in the actions of Congress. It gives States the power do do otherwise regarding laws and edicts by the States.
I don't agree with this, as that right precedes the founding as a natural right.
Hunt with Class and Classics
Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray
Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
A ruling by SCOTUS had said that the First Amendment right to assemble applied Only to Federal Law in prohibiting the right by Congress in US Vs Cruikshank. The Ruling:
The first amendment to the Constitution prohibits Congress from abridging 'the right of the people to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.' This, like the other amendments proposed and adopted at the same time, was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens, but to operate upon the National government alone. Barron v. The City of Baltimore, 7 Pet. 250; Lessee of Livingston v. Moore, id. 551; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 434; Smith v. Maryland, 18 id. 76; Withers v. Buckley, 20 id. 90; Pervear v. The Commonwealth, 5 Wall. 479; Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 id. 321; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 id. 557. It is now too late to question the correctness of this construction. As was said by the late Chief Justice, in Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 325, 'the scope and application of these amendments are no longer subjects of discussion here.' They left the authority of the States just where they found it, and added nothing to the already existing powers of the United States.
According to the ruling the 1st Amendment right to assemble applies only to redress and assembly regarding Federal issues as in the actions of Congress. It gives States the power do do otherwise regarding laws and edicts by the States.
I don't agree with this, as that right precedes the founding as a natural right.
From the NC Constitution:
Quote
"Sec. 12. Right of assembly and petition. The people have a right to assemble together to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to apply to the General Assembly for redress of grievances..."
SSE if that Sec.12 is legit ,should be a slam dunk in a legal fight. I have to wonder though,do the .gov types throw all of the Constitution out the window during a national emergency(or can they)?
A ruling by SCOTUS had said that the First Amendment right to assemble applied Only to Federal Law in prohibiting the right by Congress in US Vs Cruikshank. The Ruling:
The first amendment to the Constitution prohibits Congress from abridging 'the right of the people to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.' This, like the other amendments proposed and adopted at the same time, was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens, but to operate upon the National government alone. Barron v. The City of Baltimore, 7 Pet. 250; Lessee of Livingston v. Moore, id. 551; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. 434; Smith v. Maryland, 18 id. 76; Withers v. Buckley, 20 id. 90; Pervear v. The Commonwealth, 5 Wall. 479; Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 id. 321; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 id. 557. It is now too late to question the correctness of this construction. As was said by the late Chief Justice, in Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 325, 'the scope and application of these amendments are no longer subjects of discussion here.' They left the authority of the States just where they found it, and added nothing to the already existing powers of the United States.
According to the ruling the 1st Amendment right to assemble applies only to redress and assembly regarding Federal issues as in the actions of Congress. It gives States the power do do otherwise regarding laws and edicts by the States.
I don't agree with this, as that right precedes the founding as a natural right.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, LIBERTYand the pursuit of HAPPINESS.
The USSC can only make an “opinion”. It is up to the people to decide whether they will allow government to actually enslave them.
The right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…
This unwarranted lockdown, is based on fraudulent numbers, therefore is violating the people’s rights.
The right to petition the government goes all the way back to the Magna Carter 1215 Ch. 61. It did not specify “what level of government”, being the people have the “natural” right to address their grievances against “any” government.
That USSC decision is flawed and unconstitutional, thus rendering it null and void.
The North Carolina citizens should have been better prepared, and stepped out of their cars with LONG GUNS, being the police were traitorous thugs at that point, and had ZERO law supporting their actions.
Their actions also prove these TRAITOROUS thugs will follow orders to take guns if a law were to be passed. They are LOW I.Q. idiots, who can not think for themselves, being they can not comprehend the words of the oath they took.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
How many e-mails have you, your friends, and family sent to elected officials?
Oh when they come after my guns and piss on my 2d amendment right I will show them. Pry from my dead cold hands yeah! 2 hours later cops on guys door step, sir we need your firearms. Guy uh ok here they are..
Death by cop?
"All that the South has ever desired was that the Union, as established by our forefathers, should be preserved, and that the government, as originally organized, should be administered in purity and truth." – Robert E. Lee
How many e-mails have you, your friends, and family sent to elected officials?
Oh when they come after my guns and piss on my 2d amendment right I will show them. Pry from my dead cold hands yeah! 2 hours later cops on guys door step, sir we need your firearms. Guy uh ok here they are..
Death by cop?
No all you ph uckers talk a good game until it’s game time and you roll over like a bunch bitches..
Last edited by 79S; 04/15/20.
Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
“Carolina Cradle” Settlement of the Northwest Carolina Frontier 1747 – 1762
The “men”, described in that book above, would never have put up with the unconstitutional crap those cops committed, so why does North Carolina put up with it today?
Those traitorous thugs, with badges pinned on their chests, are a disgrace to the badge.
Last edited by ElkSlayer91; 04/15/20.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Yep
It is completely silent on States doing the restricting, and the reserve clause in the 10th Amendment gives States the right to enact anything not specifically forbidden by the Constitution. Under this assumption the States can establish State religions, abridge freedom of speech and press, and deny free assembly within the States.
Try it though...LOL.
Hunt with Class and Classics
Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray
Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”
Here's a hint: Rad the 14th Amendment, salient part quoted in my post above (privileges and immunities clause). That is the vehicle by which states were incorporated into certain restrictions in the Bill of Rights.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/m0zk1a7.jpg)
