Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Anyone Else Hear About Indictments Coming Down?

Nothing of the such will happen if, as you say, Barr is worthless, and you know it, so what is your purpose in blowing this BS? Oh yeah, Trump is s good guy who means well, but hes a dumbass.

Sheesh. Put a sock in it. Get your tooth unhung or it will drag you down the rabbit hole.

Like I said you stupid drunk, General Flynn needs to be exonerated by the courts, or Barr . Barr won’t do it, he is the one withholding evidence, so it’s up to Judge Sullivan if General Flynn has any chance in civil court.

That Q mother fuqker can suck my dick, they ain't gonna do sheit. Ain't nobody getting indicted, much less going to jail.

Of course not, and surely you don't have any evidence that there will be either, so pure opinion & speculation on your part............you emotionally want to believe it & & are in a state of denial.

There have been far too many crooks & too many years have passed with no one at all being prosecuted..........those facts are undeniable & set the tone for (the lack) of anything to change as there is no shortage of crimes to be prosecuted. It simply does not take this long to gather evidence, unless you are just passing time.

There has been far more than enough very blatant criminal activity for it all to have been brushed aside as nothing. But that is what has happened...........the more time passes the less likely anything will happen.

But I'm glad that you are optimistic & have hope............Barr is at least still fooling at least one person.

MM

Any links to the Indictments yet?

Hahaha, you lying pos. Its after 12:00 and I'm typing quite well.

Come on, tell us again how Trump needs your feeble, indolent help.

......................Of course I do not have any evidence that there will be indictments. NEVER STATED that I did and did not emphasize that I did. So! Your retort is to simply answer a question with another question. Then you submit that I am in a state of denial....NO..I am simply reflecting what the law says. What I would like to see vs what may happen is no state of denial. This has nothing to do with anybody fooling anybody. You obviously have no capability to discern the law vs feelings. And in your post above,,more feelings.

You tell me you are glad that I am optimistic and have hope. And in the very next sentence you tell me that Barr is fooling at least one person. Meaning me of course!

Your inability to not properly differentiate between the law as it relates to investigating facts vs your damned emotional hype is to say the least,,,,DUMB and in denial!

Your beef with Barr or Durham in taking too much time plus all the rest of your hype has nothing to do with how the law should proceed........I am not and was not sticking up for Barr. On this thread I have promoted the law and what should be done relative to the law. You on the other hand are plastered with emotion and feelings with no consideration for a legal viewpoints.......

..........Only the link in the first post by the OP. I do not know of any other links. The sources close to the Durham investigation might slowly disclose tid bits here and there. I say that late Aug into Sept might be a good time for Durham to make his announcement to either indict or dismiss. If the latter, that would be extremely disappointing....... Maybe during the demeeeCRAP convention in July or August?? lol....

Good timing is also a great strategy.

I don't know which way it's gonna fall..

Speaking of Durham, is his office and his investigation team still working or have they been sent home?

I would think it pretty tough to conduct a thorough investigation by staying 6 feet apart, no more that 10 people in a room at one time, no air conditioning running, etc.

They're obviously still "working," whether from home or not, because it's nice to get paid your salary whether or not you produce anything.

Maybe, but my guess they will use the Kung-Flu as an excuse to delay and delay and maybe even delay.

No, that would be your ego doing that.

Heard about the indictments coming down??

Hell, I've been hearing about those for the last four years.

You yap endlessly about "the law".....................please cite what law or statute you are referring to.

Hilary, for example, clearly as reported by various sources & undisputed, broke numerous "laws"...........what is the "law" waiting for in prosecuting her for any one of several offences?

If you're talking about evidence that a crime. i.e., some "law" was broken, then yes, Barr, Durham & all the rest who have been endlessly "investigating" have had more than ample time to gather & acquire evidence to prove a crime(s) were committed.........................if they really wanted to.

That's my problem with what's going on...........from the "evidence" or lack of, given the YEARS of supposed investigation, the only conclusion that can be drawn at this point in time is that they simply do not really want to prosecute anyone of consequence.


MM

Every fuqkin night Shaun Hannity says his sources are telling him it's fixing to go down. Bullsheit, nothing is gonna happen, and that Q tard is full of sheit.

Hannity has cried wolf for so long that he just doesn't have any credibility left, right along with DeGenova.

MM

Until the Liberal Socialist Democrat scumballs are walked into a federal prison to start their sentance,s as a result from indictments and convictions.

It's just this till then:

..............Yap? Let me tell ya something......The law is the law, but it is man who sometimes fails to properly execute justice via the laws as was the case with Hillary. I am talking about proper proceedural law and jurisprudence that should occur on the part of Barr and Durham concerning their investigation.

Your gripe is understandable. And as I have stated, I will agree with you IF no indictments are handed down. Nevertheless and because this has taken longer than you would like, and longer than I would like as well, we should not automatically come to the conclusion that things are not going on behind the scenes and that Barr or Durham simply do not want to prosecute anyone. That is total and complete supposition and opinion.......

Yes! Hillary committed crimes namely 14 violations of the espionage act. It was Comey and not the law that failed. It was Comey who took it upon himself as FBI Director to exonerate Hillary. It was Comey who violated his job description as FBI director in that it was NOT his job nor his authority to exonerate Hillary. His job was to simply refer the case to the DOJ to then have them either charge her with crimes or dismiss.

Now because this investigation has taken much longer. you assume and suppose that Barr and or Durham simply do not wish to prosecute anyone. So let's assume that will be the case and you are correct and NO indictments are handed down even though there is clear and overwhelming evidence of many crimes. Failure to prosecute will rest with either Barr or Durham and not with the law that they are sworn to uphold. In other words, the laws are only as good as the people who are willing to enforce them. If no indictments or subsequent prosecutions then the law is not at fault here.

Let it play out MM................

There would be no sense in Trump taking the job of potus or of draining the swamp if he werent planning on making them pay and it would do no good if the worlds deep state swamp werent drained also. He sure isnt getting richer from the job.

He destroys them or they destroy him and his. What would you do to criminals who tried to destroy your country and kill you and your family?

Imagine if he has the Fed, which he now controls, print up trillions and fixes our infrastructure and then proves the Fed illegally acted to rip off the people and make the Feds owners and central bank owners rich at our expense. You think he would still feel we needed to pay off the debt we would seem to owe? What if he printed up trillions and paid off the Fed with those worthless notes?

Destroying our Constitution or the USA you may ask? Doesnt our Constitution say our money must be backed by gold and silver? Who destroyed that part of our founding and substituted rags with ink? The money changers did, the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Builderbergs, Pincus, Warburgs-foreingers the traitors sold us out to years ago.

What if some of those families got rich making deals and managing money for the Payseur family and their holdings were in trusts? What if there were no Payseurs left? Wouldnt that trust revert back to the government with appropriate Senate action?

No way. Hes turning the tables on the deep state NWO crooks. Hes taking a page from the commie playbook and using their tricks on them.

Remember 18 Article 2385, or 2583 and his Presidential Order. And who deal with foreign powers to have US elections or the constitution can have their assets seized. Be nice to see Trump seize CNN, Facebook, NBC, Obama's beach house.... ? The possibilities are endless.
I wonder what those assets could get if sold.

I wonder what the Roman's thought of that possibility six months before it happened. They probably figured, "If pigs could fly".


Something is coming that will trip the left's trigger and drive them insane with retaliation against him. Hes going to let the DNC, commies and MSM go out on that crazy limb over the lions fence and cut it off by declassing the unknown truths of their collusion, depravity and plans for us.

The worlds folks will be the lions.

What will be the trigger? Could it be the pardon of Flynn? We dont know, but Trump does.