Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Ginsberg back in the hospital

I wish her well . . . .


https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-supreme-court-judge-ruth-bader-ginsburg-in-hospital-with-infection/

She needs to die, as sorry as that sounds.

Well, I'm sure praying hard.


'Nuff said.

She needs the best hospital NYC has.

I thought you guys wanted to kill off Roberts?

"Kill Off"?

Please post some links where it was suggested that "You guys" wanted to kill off Roberts.

There should be term limits or age limits.

It would help the narrative if she were to die of Covid19.

A little hyperbole. Ignored a thread not long ago where everyone was dumping on Roberts for not being a far right ideologue. I think based on Roberts not voting for cert on a Second Amendment case. Like I said I pretty much ignored the thread - no poster revealed any Supreme Court acumen. (Of course the fact that Ruth is universally considered a Constitutional scholar and an exceptional legal analyst is irrelevant. Some people here keep lining up to send flowers. We simply don't like her conclusions. Never mind the argument.)

I don't wish ill health on anyone including that vile person.

I hope the corner of the casket doesn’t bump the wall again.

Wanting a SC Justice to follow the Constitution he swore to uphold is not "far right ideologue".

Go drool somewhere else.

Yes, there's only one side to a coin and only my position to br considered. For everyone else is wrong. And nothing you say, no point you can make, will change my mind. I think that point of view lead to the demise of the Neanderthals.

No, dumbass.

There IS only ONE thing the entire premise of the Supreme Court was created to function as a branch of gov't. The US Constitution. That's it. That's all. End of story.

Sadly politics has been injected into that, as well as other branches of govt that should not be politically affiliated.

I don't buy your statement that she is "universally considered a Constitutional scholar". That is just propaganda from the liberal media. The media said the same about Obama, who led a totally corrupt administration and never followed the constitution.

So the cure is to inject the opposite political point of view and abandon reasoned argument? Was that a concept of the Founding Fathers?

What notable legal authority speaks to the contrary? You mean she rose through the judicial system being an ignoramus? They couldn't impress a scholarly liberal?

The concept of the founding fathers was the Constitution, which isn't an opposing political view.

Kent

Wasting our breath here.

Some people are too stupid to understand that the Constitution doesn't limit freedoms of citizens. It limits infringement of freedom and liberty of citizens by the government.

The concept of the Founding Fathers was a just system of government of which the Constitution forms an outline. Ever look at the old Soviet constitution? More explicit guarantee of rights there, but hardly a more just system of government. One glaring difference is the application of rights to a particular instance by rational discussion considering all points of view rather than a dictat by a particular person or political body (Politburo). One of the great old saws in favor of our adversarial system of justice; "From heat comes light."