|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
I never once suggested I wanted to go faster, the loads I had very well might be way too hot but the sd was single digits and it was a three shot clover leaf at 100 yards. I want a very accurate load and do want my velocity to remain up at 2950 or 3000 fps since I do hunt elk and big mulies and only need to have decent velocity so I still have good ballistics and penetration ( stopping power if you will ) at distances up to 500 yards. I'm not looking for a speed demon since I also load 130 grain sst for this rifle and they are moving at 3075, if I need speed I can get it from this load.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 2,518
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 2,518 |
Ok, I'm willing to try some Alliant powder. I have no load data for RL 26, the Hornady book is showing RL 17, 19 and 22, all of which are available at local shops. I have researched RL 23 and 26 but load info for these is harder to find. Has anyone tried RL 17 or 19 or 22? If so did it perform well or should I be going for 23 or 26 instead? And if anyone has a load they're using for 145 ELD X and RL 23 or 26 at least it would give me an idea of what guys are using and the performance they are getting. Thanks for all your comments so far. Do you have Mule Deer's article on new powders in the .270Win? He used RL-26 (among many others) in those tests and it performed impressively with the 150 grain. Rex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,326
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,326 |
I have had and shot several 270 Winchester rifles over the last 40+ years. Back in the day IMR4350 or 4831 were my go to powders for a 130 gr bullet. That being said, I was only getting around 2900 FPS out of them. A chrono will either make you real happy or real sad, but in all my years of shooting, I never have heard anyone brag about how fast they missed what they were shooting at. R26 has turned one of my 270's into an honest 3070 FPS shooter with 150 gr bullets! Heck years ago I could not get that speed with 130's. At 2900 FPS I was shooting sub .5" groups when I did my part and I have never seen a 130 bounce off anything I was trying to kill, whitetail, mule deer, speed goats, etc.
I may not be smart but I can lift heavy objects
I have a shotgun so I have no need for a 30-06.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,463 Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 23,463 Likes: 7 |
58.5 of rl22 seems to be the sweet spot for me and the 145 Eldx. I could push it a bit harder but don’t see the point considering everything is very healthy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,968
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,968 |
LH Rem 700 22" Ti Take off barrel bedded full length Mcmillion stock
RL 26 150 GR NP
CCI 200 Primer RP case 2 @ .41" at 200 YD, 60 GR RL 26 3054 FPS! 150 GR NP 3 @ .55" 4 @ 1"
Several of us had similar results with RL 26
kk alaska
Alaska 7 months of winter then 5 months of tourists
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Ok, I got my hands on some RL 26, I'm ready to take the leap from Hodgdon lol. I also got some brand spanking new Winchester cases, yeah I know, Lapua and Norma blah blah blah. Anyways I will be trying the RL 26 in Win cases, CCI Br2 primer pushing 145 ELDX. I have heard a few times 60 grains but still don't have any published data on starting and ending loads for this powder/bullet combination. I only have data from Hornady book with RL 22, AND data from Alliant powder website with RL 26 but not with this same ELDX bullet. Anymore info on this configuration is appreciated. Thanks for all the great info so far folks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Ok, I'm willing to try some Alliant powder. I have no load data for RL 26, the Hornady book is showing RL 17, 19 and 22, all of which are available at local shops. I have researched RL 23 and 26 but load info for these is harder to find. Has anyone tried RL 17 or 19 or 22? If so did it perform well or should I be going for 23 or 26 instead? And if anyone has a load they're using for 145 ELD X and RL 23 or 26 at least it would give me an idea of what guys are using and the performance they are getting. Thanks for all your comments so far. Do you have Mule Deer's article on new powders in the .270Win? He used RL-26 (among many others) in those tests and it performed impressively with the 150 grain. Rex No I don't have that info, but thanks for the tip. Where would I find this load data?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,001
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,001 |
60 grains seems to be the magic number. As always, approach with caution.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,150
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,150 |
I can’t get ahold of any RL26 locally so stuck with H4831 Getting 2950ish with 58 grains and the 145eld in a Fieldcraft.
Yup.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Wierd, I looked back in my notes and at 58 gr of 4831sc I was at 3075, and with 58 gr reg 4831 I was at 3020. These higher velocities was why I started questioning my pressures in the first place. And that's with a 22 inch barrel doo I should not be faster. Anyways gonna give this RL 26 a try in the next couple days and see what I come up with, I'll let you all know what I find out once I've chronographed the loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4 |
Ok, I'm willing to try some Alliant powder. I have no load data for RL 26, the Hornady book is showing RL 17, 19 and 22, all of which are available at local shops. I have researched RL 23 and 26 but load info for these is harder to find. Has anyone tried RL 17 or 19 or 22? If so did it perform well or should I be going for 23 or 26 instead? And if anyone has a load they're using for 145 ELD X and RL 23 or 26 at least it would give me an idea of what guys are using and the performance they are getting. Thanks for all your comments so far. Alliant publishes a data manual every year online. Just download it. Hodgdon does a printed manual every year, but cartridges come and go in those, but their online data covers it all. I found data for StaBall 6.5 in the .243, which isn't in the 2020 book. Anytime you substitute components you introduce variables that may result in issues like you're having. Best to stay as close to the data as you can while you're learning. Never exceed it, and stop adding powder when you get to the published max velocity, regardless of the charge level you're at. Check your case length, and measure the O.D. of the necks on your loaded rounds. EDIT: Just checked my Hornady book, and you've substituted primers, brass, and powder (4831SC uses H4831 data, but is not identical and IMO should at least be treated as a different lot). Not a bit surprised that you have some issues. Did you work up to where you are, or pick a level under max? Primer choice alone can affect pressures by thousands of psi. Every loading manual has articles on the various aspects of the process and how they affect your results. Read them if you haven't, and re-read them if you have.
Last edited by Pappy348; 05/31/20.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993 |
If you can find it, RL26 is the magic pixie dust you are looking for. This will get in you in the ball park:
Cartridge : .270 Win. (SAAMI)
Bullet : .277, 145, Hornady ELD-X 27356
Useable Case Capaci: 58.678 grain H2O = 3.810 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Alliant Reloder-26 *C
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.82% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-08.2 96 56.00 2858 2630 46593 11935 99.5 1.291
-07.4 97 56.50 2886 2683 48072 11999 99.7 1.272
-06.6 98 57.00 2915 2735 49607 12056 99.8 1.254
-05.7 99 57.50 2943 2788 51197 12107 99.9 1.236
-04.9 100 58.00 2971 2842 52847 12152 100.0 1.218
-04.1 101 58.50 2999 2895 54556 12190 100.0 1.201
-03.3 101 59.00 3027 2949 56334 12222 100.0 1.183 ! Near Maximum !
-02.5 102 59.50 3054 3004 58178 12253 100.0 1.167 ! Near Maximum !
-01.6 103 60.00 3082 3058 60091 12283 100.0 1.150 ! Near Maximum !
-00.8 104 60.50 3110 3113 62080 12312 100.0 1.133 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 105 61.00 3137 3168 64145 12340 100.0 1.117 ! Near Maximum !
+00.8 106 61.50 3164 3224 66294 12367 100.0 1.101 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.6 107 62.00 3192 3280 68526 12393 100.0 1.085 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.5 107 62.50 3219 3336 70851 12418 100.0 1.070 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.3 108 63.00 3246 3392 73268 12442 100.0 1.054 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.1 109 63.50 3273 3449 75785 12465 100.0 1.039 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by ± 3% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 3% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 105 61.00 3185 3266 69260 12148 100.0 1.085 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 3% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 105 61.00 3082 3059 59397 12557 100.0 1.152 ! Near Maximum !
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Yes, I have looked at my Hornady book AND checked the downloadable data online from both Hornady and Alliant AMD neither of them show load data forthe configuration of Hornady Eldx 145 using RL 26 for a 270. Apparently this must be some kind of unicorn load since there is no publishe info from the manufacturers, I hope that means it is a great load since they are keeping it a secret. I have now emailed both Hornady and Alliant asking for any info they could offer. As soon as I hear from them I will start loading a test up from possibly 56 to 60 grains looking sty all your posts and and depending on what the manufacturers suggest. Thanks for all the recommendations and I'll be posting what I find out from my testing as soon as I have the info.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993 |
Yes, I have looked at my Hornady book AND checked the downloadable data online from both Hornady and Alliant AMD neither of them show load data forthe configuration of Hornady Eldx 145 using RL 26 for a 270. Apparently this must be some kind of unicorn load since there is no publishe info from the manufacturers, I hope that means it is a great load since they are keeping it a secret. I have now emailed both Hornady and Alliant asking for any info they could offer. As soon as I hear from them I will start loading a test up from possibly 56 to 60 grains looking sty all your posts and and depending on what the manufacturers suggest. Thanks for all the recommendations and I'll be posting what I find out from my testing as soon as I have the info. Just do what everyone's done for the last 70 years. Start low, and work up. It's really not all that hard.
Last edited by antelope_sniper; 05/31/20.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,501
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,501 |
60.5gr RL 26, Fed 210, Winchester case, 3.210 oal. The rule of thumb two yrs ago when most of us started stuffing rl26 into the 270 case. You cannot get enough rl26 into that case to hurt anything. Far as his load of H4831 I would switch primers, and try it again..
Last edited by 79S; 05/31/20.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4 |
Yes, I have looked at my Hornady book AND checked the downloadable data online from both Hornady and Alliant AMD neither of them show load data forthe configuration of Hornady Eldx 145 using RL 26 for a 270. Apparently this must be some kind of unicorn load since there is no publishe info from the manufacturers, I hope that means it is a great load since they are keeping it a secret. I have now emailed both Hornady and Alliant asking for any info they could offer. As soon as I hear from them I will start loading a test up from possibly 56 to 60 grains looking sty all your posts and and depending on what the manufacturers suggest. Thanks for all the recommendations and I'll be posting what I find out from my testing as soon as I have the info. Sorry, I quoted off the wrong post. Mainly I was trying to explain the pressure issue you have with loads from the Hornady manual. Again, no surprise that you have them because your components are different, except the bullet. I expect that the reason there's no data for your bullets is that RL26 probably came out after the Hornady manual was written, and the ELDX wasn't commonly in use when Alliant worked up their data. Takes time for companies to catch up with this stuff and testing is expensive and time consuming, so they have to pick and choose from available components. Alliant data goes from 130gr straight to 150gr, skipping the middle weights. Absent actual data, I would go with loads for a bullet a bit heavier, and work up from there, matching the other components as much as possible. BTW Mule Deer's .270 article in Handloader 322 lists 60gr of RL26 with your bullet, in Winchester brass with CCI200 primers, the same load he used with 150gr Nosler ABLRs. To the best of my knowledge, BR2 primers are the same as the 200s, just made by the most skilled workers.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,736
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,736 |
I like R26...for cold er temps/hunting. My wonderful load of 60gr/160 NP in a previous 22" .270 went 2930fps. It was around .90 inch "until". Until the temps reached 80 deg here and my groups opened up to 2 1/2" or more and hard bolt lift/ejection marks on case head. Bummer. I have some R26 ( 2# ) I'm trying to trade for either R17 or R23 around here. Dang hazmat fees really put a damper on me ordering a couple pounds. It might be worth it if I needed an 8# jug of anything!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 4 |
Ouch!
I worked up my load for the 160s with now-discontinued W780, and have enough for my "duration". My load is mild, presumably about 2700fps, and has killed several deer, very much dead pretty damn quick, for my crew and myself. Great bullet, and the somewhat blunt profile bothers me not a bit.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
[quote=Jim_Knight] I like R26...for cold er temps/hunting. [/quote Same experience for me which is a shame but could still work for winter time hunting. I would recommend getting R16 instead of R17 as you might have a repeat experience with R17 due to hot weather spikes. R16 is almost a flat liner across all normal temperatures and it loads very similar to R17 just not as dense.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Ok so I loaded up some 145 ELDX into new never fired Win cases with CCI Br2 primers with a cartridge overall length of 3.350. I started my loads at 57.4 grains of RL 26 and stopped at 60.6, knowing that a few of you had said around 60 grains is the magic number. By the way I tried to get loaf info from both Hornady and Alliant and both said they had not done testing on this bullet powder combo so they gave me no info. I have both emails if you are interested in seeing them. Lol. So street loading the rounds I went to test them. This is what I got from my basically new Magnetospeed chrono, temp outside was about 65F. Remember I shoot a Winchester XPR with a 22 inch barrel.
57.4 3035 57.6 3003 57.8 3026 58.0 3044 58.2 3050 58.4 3070
And that's where I stopped testing since primers were a bit flat and noticed harder bolt lift and on final round noticed a ejector mark on case.
So I really don't know how I'm getting these speeds and pressures with these loads. I am going to drop my starting gains to 56 and if I can get a decent node around 2975 for without pressure problems I will be very happy. I just don't understand how everyone else says 60 or what they are shooting without any pressure problems, the only thing I can come up with is possibly a shorter headspace in my rifle. Or could it be there primer? Anyways like I said I'll try to lighten that load up a bit more and try the chronograph again.
|
|
|
|
564 members (10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 1234, 12344mag, 59 invisible),
2,290
guests, and
1,317
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,393
Posts18,488,781
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|