Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Charges Against Officer in Atlanta Shooting

When Benjamin Netanyahu was asked about killing Palestinian children his reply was, there was no such thing , they are just small terrorist ! :0

In my law enforcement training we were constantly reminded to remember that over 30% of LEOs that are shot are shot with their own sidearm. And of paramount importance in any physical proximity to a subject we were taught to protect our weapon from being taken. It was drilled into us that anyone you were grappling with was armed if he overpowered you. It was made plain in one class that I remember very well to shoot to kill any assailant that managed to take a night stick (baton) or our pepper spray. The reason being that he had the means to take your sidearm at that time. An officer is allowed to up the ante in the force continuum. I never carried a taser and am unfamiliar with the device but I am assuming that in the short time duration of this incident the officers didn't have the luxury of guessing what this dude would do next.

No, they didn't have any such luxury.. And shot a guy running away roughly 15' away iirc. I fully respect that you concider it justified.

Why is it these cases of systemic racism usually always involve ‘regular customers’ for law enforcement?



Link

Dick nose.






😁

Pecker neck!

Awwwww, looks like a date...........

Kiss my azz, liver lips.





This seems more productive than debating something we have no control over!

I agree, otherwise we would have to call each other liberals for simply disagreeing as that seems to be the 'Fire way this evening (year? )

.

Just adding here. The real outrage should be directed at whomever allowed this pos out of the big house because of the damned virus! Pathetic.

This place has always had a bunch of folks that yell at the walls.

Buncha fugging liberals!

Mic Drop!

😎

PS,

If the quotes are true and accurate that District Attorney Paul Howard said that a taser is considered a “lethal weapon” when used by police on protesters....But a “non-lethal” weapon in the situation where a black man was shot by a cop.

My opinion is...

The Atlanta DA is a Fûck'n POS who deserves to have his ass tased, then beat with an ASP and finally shot in the back.

😎

Now I didn't say it was justified and to be straight with you I haven't watched the video. I will say that 15 feet is a very short distance. And I don't know what the officer perceived in what had to have been an excited and stressed state of mind. What I have a lot of trouble understanding is why would a white man consider serving as a policeman in a black majority urban area. If you think you have to be a LEO go to work in Wyoming or Montana or even northeast California or be a state or federal game warden. Don't even think you can make a difference in Haiti West. There is nothing but trouble and heartache in big urban policing. Look who is getting punished and who isn't.

Big difference between an unarmed perp running away and a guy who has already beaten two cops, tazed one and now is shooting as he runs. Cop is allowed to shoot him in the back IMO, as anybody should be and should. Good shoot. Boys in blue are right on this one.

Yah, justified was my word... Only 15 feet or so, ain't much. He was sprinting away. But a pos is a pos. About the last job I would wish upon anyone. There's no solution but crack down on the thugs and stop letting them get away with chit. Likelihood of that happening? Damned slim to none. It'll not be the last we see of this chit, bad outcomes and over-reactions. There's always been thugs but good gawd it seems they have no recourse now. Imagine, NO Bail areas! WTF?

Anyways.

Looks like DA Paul Howard is the next Reverend Al Sharpton for the black folks to follow....What a POS!

😎

There's a dentist in Oklahoma that shot a black thug in the back as he ran away and is still rotting in prison. I said it then and I'll say it now in support of this cop...Maybe shooting him in the back IS self-defense. In the dentist's case, there's a good possibility the guy would've came back with friends, looking to kill him. In this case, the guy was shooting as he ran. Both should be justified.

The Okie pharmacist I remember well.
Damn tragedy what Oklahoma did to him.

One of the little rats that robbed the pharmacy and lived was also convictes of murder but released aftet 4 years. Meanwhile Erslund will die in prison.

They really oughta have these trials in Semi Valley....

Nope, Ersland got what he deserved. You can shoot people in self-defense, but you don't get to shoot people because you're angry with them.

"Ersland is seen grabbing a handgun from behind a counter and firing it, striking Parker in the head as he tries to put on a ski mask. Parker, who was unarmed, falls to the floor out of view of the camera.

Ersland then chases the armed man out of the store. When he returns, Ersland walks behind a counter with his back to Parker, retrieves a second handgun and returns to Parker, standing over him as he fires five more shots into his torso. Medical examiner's ruled that Parker did not die from the initial shot to the head but was killed by the additional gunshot wounds."

His 16-year-old victim was also unconscious as Ersland killed him:

"But criminal law experts said self-defense has limits, particularly in this case, because Parker was unconscious when Ersland fired again.""