24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 6.5 PRC ? [Re: Mkopmani] #15067421 07/20/20
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 18,738
huntsman22 Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 18,738
Originally Posted by Mkopmani
Both 264 & 6.5 PRC ballistics are nearly identical.


Yeah. As 'identical' as comparing the creedmoor to the PRC.

BP-B2

Re: 6.5 PRC ? [Re: Mkopmani] #15067429 07/20/20
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 49,752
M
Mule Deer Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 49,752
Originally Posted by Mkopmani
While I'm a supporter of the 6.5 PRC and think it will prove to be a good round, note that the magazines don't say anything about it being a barrel burner, yet the 264 WM continues to be labeled. Both 264 & 6.5 PRC ballistics are nearly identical. I have a Sendero 264 and love it, but do wish it had a 1:8 twist for the heavier bullets. Mine will shoot 130's but not as accurately as 120's. 140 boat tails are not an option for under 1 MOA. Enjoy the PRC!


Apparently you have never noticed that the .264 has burns a lot more powder for relatively little added velocity about the 6.5 PRC. In fact, the .264's powder capacity, with a bullet seated, is almost 30% greater than the PRCs--and the heat of more burning powder is a MAJOR factor in barrel life.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: 6.5 PRC ? [Re: Ray63] #15068440 07/21/20
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,422
R
Ray63 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,422
WOOPS.... MOSSBERG.

Re: 6.5 PRC ? [Re: huntsman22] #15071059 07/22/20
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 32
M
Mkopmani Offline
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 32
I guess you're right that the 264 WM still has another 150fps over the PRC, which has about 200fps over the Creed. I thought I'd read that the PRC was roughly the same as 264 WM but not so. In working with my 264, I've noticed considerable differences in barrel heat depending on powders and of course charges. I migrate towards moderately slow powders rather than the super slow stuff and the barrel stays a LOT cooler. Admittedly, a 264 most of the time cannot benefit from its case capacity, but I've not seen evidence of erratic performance running charges of only 59gr.

I still find it funny how the 264 gets labeled as a barrel burner and no one talks of the 26 Nosler, 6.5-300 WM. Somehow these get a pass. The PRC is an interesting round and at some point I'll probably have one.

Re: 6.5 PRC ? [Re: Ray63] #15086787 07/27/20
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,768
E
elkivory Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
E
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,768
if you want in the game cheap, p.m. me (6.5 prc that is )....just spent my wad on a 6.5 rpm, so have a "turn key" available,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

IC-A

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RR1
Who's Online Now
361 registered members (280shooter, 1lessdog, 1minute, 1lesfox, 40 invisible), 1,446 guests, and 1,073 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
RR2/3










Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2020 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.3.20 Page Time: 0.035s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7967 MB (Peak: 0.8821 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2020-08-09 04:56:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS