Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Whoops, a little birdy must have told Trump that Fauci was dirty

Fauci has known all along.

I now know how Trump knew.

And once again the lefts hero was a lying POS the whole time. Who could've guessed?

Well, not the kool-aid drinkers, Suckermore and Gayghost.

Do you have a link to that, something more than just a screen shot.

I want to pass this along.

Article in Question

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

From The Presidents mouth to the public's ears.
Oh but the Left said no, "it doesn't work, you are going to kill people."

Meanwhile they were probably taking it themselves....

People read the article in the LINK I posted.

PDF version easier to read for some devices

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/pdf/1743-422X-2-69.pdf

Thanks.

200 million new cases of malaria a year and those treated for it get Plaquenil. Its given to pregant women and those breastfeeding also. Yeah, its a real killer. Maybe the worlds most prescribed drug, but Suckawhore and his bud SAC want more proof.

Havent seen SAC in a while. Prolly meeting and getting another list of BS from the dimocommie machine.

This will get real interesting closer to election time!

"But- - - - -we've gotta spend millions of dollars (or maybe billions) developing a vaccine, and bankrupt the world in the process! It's the dummycrap way!"

Where does the article link it to Fauci?

Yep. I've referred to that article. I just wonder what his fiscal situation is.

The Michigan Governor even barred doctors in Michigan from using it on Covid patients for a period of time under threat of losing their license, I wonder how many died because of that.

For a peak under the sheets, it is seldom wrong to follow the money.

Freud's first slip was pink and lacey.

A brief look at the rules for conflict of interest for the National Institute for Health, if I'm reading it correctly...is they pretty much set their own rules. On paper a NIH staffer can only hold 15,000 in stock of a pharma company that would benefit from NIH research, but in 2005, the NIH itself relaxed the rules and said they would examine each case on an individual basis.
Ok, why does that matter? Apparently the way it works, is NIH uses it's very expensive research and funding (tax payer funding) to develop a drug that shows promise. When the bulk of the R&D is done, in swoops a big pharma company, patents the drug, markets it at a huge, 1000% is not unheard of, profit. So, with no publicly written rules, an unethical staffer at NIH could have his wife or cousin Vinnie go out and buy a ton of stock in the 'about to be successful' company, using insider info.
So why is chloroquinine being buried in spite of clinical evidence that it is profoundly effective? It's an old drug...no patent...no money honey.

And who will pick up the pieces of the bankrupt world economy? Globalist corporations of course.

I dunno jag, it may work but I don't believe a laboratory study using cell cultures proves it.

Cures and successful research dry up grants. It's that simple.

There's no money in cheap widely successful cures. The Rothschilds cant allow it, nor can they allow peace and harmony, as in our big cities.

Know the real enemy, America.