24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
Went to the local saw shop this morning, owner talked me into a test drive of a new Husqvarna 572XP. He had a 32" full skip chisel bit chain on it, a dry old 3 ft Doug Fir test log.
WOW, just wow. an absolute roostertail of sawdust just flew. My old saw is a 372XP (same cubes, 71cc). Never ran a saw this size with that much torque, awesome.
Wondered if any of you guys have been running one of these, I am always skittish about buying new "revolutionary"..."new and improved", sometimes I get a little carried away with myself.

Last edited by flintlocke; 08/28/20.

Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
GB1

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
Been running a 372xp with a few modifications for about a year, usually with a 32” skip tooth. My brother bought the 572 a few months ago. they’re about even with his being bone stock. Both are a pleasure to cut with. I chose the 372 because it was proven, the 572 with auto tune had a lot of bad reviews.

If you really want to smile grab a 395!

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
I don’t know how it could be better than the 372 but haven’t had the chance to try the 572. I bought a used saw with skip chain and I just don’t see what the lure is to it. Seemed to cut a lot slower.

Hutch

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
Originally Posted by Hutch
I don’t know how it could be better than the 372 but haven’t had the chance to try the 572. I bought a used saw with skip chain and I just don’t see what the lure is to it. Seemed to cut a lot slower.

Hutch


Big bar for big wood, on a smaller CC saw to keep the RPM up. If you’re not cutting large diameter wood then no, you wouldn’t see a need for it.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,579
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,579
I've ran a 394xp for years. Trim saw it is NOT lol but I've yet to set it on anything it wouldn't breeze through. Its running a 36" bar

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
Hutch, I see you are from east Texas, don't know about your tree varieties...but in softwood varieties in the PNW a full skip (with enough power) at high rpm/chain speed boosts production and wins logging competitions. I would suspect in hardwood it would be a disaster.


Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,461
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,461
Originally Posted by rosco1
Been running a 372xp with a few modifications for about a year, usually with a 32” skip tooth. My brother bought the 572 a few months ago. they’re about even with his being bone stock. Both are a pleasure to cut with. I chose the 372 because it was proven, the 572 with auto tune had a lot of bad reviews.

If you really want to smile grab a 395!

I ran the 394 which was the predecessor to the 395 as my falling saws. Great saw IMO.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 8,252
673 Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 8,252
Originally Posted by rosco1
Been running a 372xp with a few modifications for about a year, usually with a 32” skip tooth. My brother bought the 572 a few months ago. they’re about even with his being bone stock. Both are a pleasure to cut with. I chose the 372 because it was proven, the 572 with auto tune had a lot of bad reviews.

If you really want to smile grab a 395!

After a 394 for years I now am on my 2nd 395.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Last edited by 673; 08/28/20.
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
I've never run a 395, I've heard they are something else...but at 74 years old, I'm not capable of handling an 18 pound powerhead..let alone all the bar it could handle. Grin.


Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 8,252
673 Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 8,252
My buddy just bought a 572 and I couldn't believe how high that saw ran, and really cut into 2-3ft fir pretty good, great saw.

IC B3

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,879
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,879
Not a husky guy. Heard mixed feelings on them. Of course the guys that don't like them bought the cheaper ones.

Attached Images
20200828_203140.jpg (21.18 KB, 161 downloads)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Yes it was a post oak about 30in diameter. Never tried it on a pine. Bought a regular chain the next day. I’m not a logger just a lineman that has to cut a lot of trees off the line.


Hutch

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Went to the local saw shop this morning, owner talked me into a test drive of a new Husqvarna 572XP. He had a 32" full skip chisel bit chain on it, a dry old 3 ft Doug Fir test log.
WOW, just wow. an absolute roostertail of sawdust just flew. My old saw is a 372XP (same cubes, 71cc). Never ran a saw this size with that much torque, awesome.
Wondered if any of you guys have been running one of these, I am always skittish about buying new "revolutionary"..."new and improved", sometimes I get a little carried away with myself.


I own and use a 372XP at home, I use a 572XP at work and my next purchase will be a 572XP X-torq.


These are my opinions, feel free to disagree.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,335
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Went to the local saw shop this morning, owner talked me into a test drive of a new Husqvarna 572XP. He had a 32" full skip chisel bit chain on it, a dry old 3 ft Doug Fir test log.
WOW, just wow. an absolute roostertail of sawdust just flew. My old saw is a 372XP (same cubes, 71cc). Never ran a saw this size with that much torque, awesome.
Wondered if any of you guys have been running one of these, I am always skittish about buying new "revolutionary"..."new and improved", sometimes I get a little carried away with myself.


I own and use a 372XP at home, I use a 572XP at work and my next purchase will be a 572XP X-torq.


No issues with the 572 I take it? I’m wishing I went that way after seeing my brothers stock 572 run right with my modded 372xp x-torq . The main issues I’ve heard about them is elevation changes screw with the auto tune in the 572’s. That’s no good for me so I shied away from it.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,112
Correction fellas, I tested the 572XP X Torq, More than impressed but would like to hear more about auto tune...wild variations around here with elevation, 1000ft to 7,000ft.


Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
Originally Posted by rosco1
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Went to the local saw shop this morning, owner talked me into a test drive of a new Husqvarna 572XP. He had a 32" full skip chisel bit chain on it, a dry old 3 ft Doug Fir test log.
WOW, just wow. an absolute roostertail of sawdust just flew. My old saw is a 372XP (same cubes, 71cc). Never ran a saw this size with that much torque, awesome.
Wondered if any of you guys have been running one of these, I am always skittish about buying new "revolutionary"..."new and improved", sometimes I get a little carried away with myself.


I own and use a 372XP at home, I use a 572XP at work and my next purchase will be a 572XP X-torq.


No issues with the 572 I take it? I’m wishing I went that way after seeing my brothers stock 572 run right with my modded 372xp x-torq . The main issues I’ve heard about them is elevation changes screw with the auto tune in the 572’s. That’s no good for me so I shied away from it.



None what so ever, ripped into a couple of black box trees in the main park during the week and it tore them up in a satisfying manner. The starting is different but not a problem or issue, I find the saw to be excellent to use and it definitely has more grunt than my 372XP.

I cannot say anything about how it operates at elevation as I live on a bloody great big flat plain and I am kept busy cutting down everything that is higher than I am...feels like that anyway.


These are my opinions, feel free to disagree.

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

606 members (163bc, 06hunter59, 1936M71, 10gaugeman, 1beaver_shooter, 69 invisible), 2,586 guests, and 1,334 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,716
Posts18,475,621
Members73,941
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.157s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8660 MB (Peak: 0.9945 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 22:57:18 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS