Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire L. Lin Wood - Kyle Rittenhouse's attorney just locked out of Twitter account.

L. Lin Wood was just locked out of his twitter account presumably for posting an article about POTUS Trump's support for his client.

Control the platforms, control the narrative.

Maybe he'll get irritated enough to go after Twittidiot on his own dime.

Wait, I thought that patriots were in control of Twitter?

I just saw him on Carlson's show earlier.

It truly is an information war. Communication is what the enemy attacks first.
This attorney has what should be a dismissal for his client, kr.

That twitter shut him up goes to show that this goes beyond Rittenhouse in its impact.

Restriction of the First Amendment rights.

Twitter might be gonna wish they hadn't done that.

The First Amendment is a protection against governmental actors, and Twitter isn't.

Not really.

The 1st Amendment allows freedom of speech without retribution by government.

Twitter isn't govt.

But it does exemplify the double standard between what they allow the Left to post, and what they allow the Right to post.

I expect you are correct.

He needs to take it to 4chan.

Most of American has no idea about 4chan.

Maybe not. But 4chan would put his message anywhere he wants it to go.

I so wish all the conservative patriots here knew what the Bill of Rights actually states. It's bad enough when all the woke liberals cry about freedom of speach.

They aren't as omnipotent as they once were several years ago. Lots of moderating and deleting going on now As I learned reading through the Rittenhouse threads.

Same as what has happened over at Reddit.

Tuck Fwitter

Hoping Dorsey and the like minded social media platform owners get gutted by the Feds for operating as monopolies when Trump wins.

Trump isn’t done with social media and fake news operations.

If he can find a way, he’ll shred them for bias.

😎

Is it true that the board of directors of Twitter serves hors d'oeuvres made from the organs of small children?

I read that on Facebook

While this is true there is a case which deals with this situation that is along the same bounds as herein.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

This woman was passing out flyers in a 'company town' which was privately owned. She was arrested for trespassing, but eventually the SC ruled in her favor as the sidewalk was allowed to be accessed by the public freely. Therefore by allowing such wide open access to the public the court ruled that her First Amendment rights should be held intact.

Many have long known about similar instances with yewtewb, giggle, twat'r, DARPAbook, etc., but so far no one has taken it to court so that everyone can have their First Amendment rights validated since these companies are essentially doing the same thing with their freely accessed, public 'sidewalk'.

I cannot see how it wouldn't be a slam dunk case, but I'm no jewdical Scholar.