|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. Did you watch the video? Im not saying it was a bad shoot. I am saying the 3 prong test provided in the Graham vs. Connor decision will ultimately determine if it was a good shoot. Not your uninformed opinions. I’m aware what graham vs Connor says, you just sound like a retard trying to make everyone else look stupid. It’s a video of a guy pulling a weapon on a cop during a wrestling match on the street. I don’t think the average dude needs to look at court cases from the 80’s to decide it’s a good shoot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. I avoid the language "fleeing felon." It may be a felony to import parakeets without following certain procedures. I am not sure that elevates the threat the person poses. And thankfully you are not a SCOTUS justice. Because time and time again you post dumschiet like the above.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do? I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force. Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon. This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject. Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,146 Likes: 23
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,146 Likes: 23 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is.........
Paul
"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.
Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.
molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do? I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force. Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon. This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject. Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/There you go numbnuts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is......... Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting? Justified. It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people.
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620 Likes: 1 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. Did you miss the part where he drew a weapon? Makes everything you wrote moot.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. Did you watch the video? Im not saying it was a bad shoot. I am saying the 3 prong test provided in the Graham vs. Connor decision will ultimately determine if it was a good shoot. Not your uninformed opinions. I’m aware what graham vs Connor says, you just sound like a retard trying to make everyone else look stupid. It’s a video of a guy pulling a weapon on a cop during a wrestling match on the street. I don’t think the average dude needs to look at court cases from the 80’s to decide it’s a good shoot. They should. Perhaps not in this circumstance because it appears to be obvious, but most of these 'tards are completely ignorant to what actually matters in a deadly force incident when determining the justification. These same mopes would be frothing at the mouth if the camera angle was different (about a foot to the left) and the suspect was a different race and was wearing a maga hat....fact.
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do? I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force. Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon. This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject. Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/There you go numbnuts Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon." "The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12." The policy I operated under read as such. Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when: 1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force. and 2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others. and 3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop. and 4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others. See, no use of the word fleeing felon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. Did you miss the part where he drew a weapon? Makes everything you wrote moot. Did you miss my reply directly before your question, einstein?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is......... Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting? Justified. It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people. My head is out of my ass and TN vs Garner doesn't belong in this discussion. I don't know why you brought it up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do? I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force. Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon. This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject. Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/There you go numbnuts Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon." "The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12." The policy I operated under read as such. Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when: 1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force. and 2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others. and 3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop. and 4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others. See, no use of the word fleeing felon. Yes and they specifically state deadly force is not justified in apprehension of a non violent felon. So what does that tell you?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576 Likes: 17 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do? I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force. Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon. This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject. Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon." https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/There you go numbnuts Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon." "The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12." The policy I operated under read as such. Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when: 1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force. and 2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others. and 3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop. and 4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others. See, no use of the word fleeing felon. Yes and they specifically state deadly force is not justified in apprehension of a non violent felon. So what does that tell you? It tells me to avoid the language fleeing felon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?
The answers to those questions will determine legality.
Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner. I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is......... Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting? Justified. It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people. My head is out of my ass and TN vs Garner doesn't belong in this discussion. I don't know why you brought it up. Nope this is a Graham vs. Connor applicable situation. I'm surprised you of all people didn't want the cop to get on his knees and beg for forgiveness. Or perhaps attempt to de-escalate the situation with kumbaya time around a campfire. Because you're an idiot. Let us not forget your love for the patron saint Floyd.
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309 |
When the hell has anyone on this site defended a white guy wearing a maga hat fighting a cop?
When has that even happened?
Or are you just being obtuse because you’re a retard?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
Based on Graham vs. Connor it was 100% justifiable use of force.
It's not even debatable.
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712 Likes: 10 |
Based on Graham vs. Connor it was 100% justifiable use of force.
It's not even debatable. Wow that was simple. No outrage or hyperbole.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,108
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,108 |
Shooting aside, that was a good takedown!
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274 |
Was the cop a midget or was the oppressed minority Oxblood Oxheart?
Eliminate qualified immunity and you'll eliminate cops who act like they are above the law.
|
|
|
|
572 members (007FJ, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 1234, 10Glocks, 1941USMC, 50 invisible),
2,270
guests, and
1,135
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,647
Posts18,493,344
Members73,977
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|