24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by widrahthaar
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


Did you watch the video?



Im not saying it was a bad shoot.

I am saying the 3 prong test provided in the Graham vs. Connor decision will ultimately determine if it was a good shoot. Not your uninformed opinions.


I’m aware what graham vs Connor says, you just sound like a retard trying to make everyone else look stupid.

It’s a video of a guy pulling a weapon on a cop during a wrestling match on the street. I don’t think the average dude needs to look at court cases from the 80’s to decide it’s a good shoot.


Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


I avoid the language "fleeing felon." It may be a felony to import parakeets without following certain procedures. I am not sure that elevates the threat the person poses.




And thankfully you are not a SCOTUS justice. Because time and time again you post dumschiet like the above.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do?


I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force.

Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon.

This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject.


Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,146
Likes: 23
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,146
Likes: 23
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is.........


Paul

"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.

Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.

molɔ̀ːn labé skýla

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do?


I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force.

Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon.

This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject.


Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."


https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/

There you go numbnuts

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is.........


Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting?


Justified.


It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people.

Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,185
Righteous.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.

Did you miss the part where he drew a weapon? Makes everything you wrote moot.


A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by widrahthaar
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by widrahthaar
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


Did you watch the video?



Im not saying it was a bad shoot.

I am saying the 3 prong test provided in the Graham vs. Connor decision will ultimately determine if it was a good shoot. Not your uninformed opinions.


I’m aware what graham vs Connor says, you just sound like a retard trying to make everyone else look stupid.

It’s a video of a guy pulling a weapon on a cop during a wrestling match on the street. I don’t think the average dude needs to look at court cases from the 80’s to decide it’s a good shoot.


They should. Perhaps not in this circumstance because it appears to be obvious, but most of these 'tards are completely ignorant to what actually matters in a deadly force incident when determining the justification.

These same mopes would be frothing at the mouth if the camera angle was different (about a foot to the left) and the suspect was a different race and was wearing a maga hat....fact.

Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do?


I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force.

Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon.

This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject.


Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."


https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/

There you go numbnuts



Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon."

"The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12."

The policy I operated under read as such.

Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when:

1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force.

and

2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others.

and

3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop.

and

4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others.

See, no use of the word fleeing felon.

IC B3

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.

Did you miss the part where he drew a weapon? Makes everything you wrote moot.


Did you miss my reply directly before your question, einstein?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is.........


Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting?


Justified.


It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people.



My head is out of my ass and TN vs Garner doesn't belong in this discussion. I don't know why you brought it up.

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do?


I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force.

Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon.

This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject.


Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."


https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/

There you go numbnuts



Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon."

"The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12."

The policy I operated under read as such.

Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when:

1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force.

and

2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others.

and

3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop.

and

4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others.

See, no use of the word fleeing felon.


Yes and they specifically state deadly force is not justified in apprehension of a non violent felon. So what does that tell you?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 26,576
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


So, if the police are called because a man is acting irrationally, jumping up and down on cars, and armed, what are the cops supposed to do?


I'm just providing you what the supreme court decided in Graham vs. Connor, a landmark case in use of deadly force.

Tennessee vs. Garner specifically deals with deadly force use regarding a fleeing felon.

This case law, not my opinion, however I do understand how ignorant most of you are on the subject.


Tell us what Tn vs Garner says about a "fleeing felon."


https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/

There you go numbnuts



Thank you for illustrating exactly why I avoid the language "fleeing felon."

"The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. Pp. 7-12."

The policy I operated under read as such.

Deadly force may be used on a fleeing suspect when:

1.The person committed a crime involving the use or threatened use of deadly force.

and

2.The person is armed or otherwise poses a threat to others.

and

3.The person has disobeyed an order to stop.

and

4. the use of deadly force by the officer doesn't pose an undue risk to others.

See, no use of the word fleeing felon.


Yes and they specifically state deadly force is not justified in apprehension of a non violent felon. So what does that tell you?


It tells me to avoid the language fleeing felon.

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by 12344mag
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Severity of the crime at issue? Was the suspect actively resisting and attempting to flee an arrest? Was the suspect an immediate danger to the officer and public?

The answers to those questions will determine legality.

Unless he was a fleeing felon the officer was attempting to apprehend...the see Tn v Garner.


I wonder how severe pulling a gun on a cop is.........


Obviously a violent felony. And you could probably articulate the act put the officer in immediate danger......so what would that make the shooting?


Justified.


It's that simple. Pull your head out of your azz people.



My head is out of my ass and TN vs Garner doesn't belong in this discussion. I don't know why you brought it up.


Nope this is a Graham vs. Connor applicable situation.

I'm surprised you of all people didn't want the cop to get on his knees and beg for forgiveness. Or perhaps attempt to de-escalate the situation with kumbaya time around a campfire.

Because you're an idiot.

Let us not forget your love for the patron saint Floyd.

Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 10/23/20.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,309
When the hell has anyone on this site defended a white guy wearing a maga hat fighting a cop?

When has that even happened?

Or are you just being obtuse because you’re a retard?

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Based on Graham vs. Connor it was 100% justifiable use of force.

It's not even debatable.


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Online Confused
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,712
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by deflave
Based on Graham vs. Connor it was 100% justifiable use of force.

It's not even debatable.


Wow that was simple. No outrage or hyperbole.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,108
Campfire Ranger
Online Happy
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 25,108
Shooting aside, that was a good takedown!


“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
Was the cop a midget or was the oppressed minority Oxblood Oxheart?


Eliminate qualified immunity and you'll eliminate cops who act like they are above the law.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

572 members (007FJ, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 1234, 10Glocks, 1941USMC, 50 invisible), 2,270 guests, and 1,135 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,647
Posts18,493,344
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.463s Queries: 55 (0.017s) Memory: 0.9202 MB (Peak: 1.0500 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 13:57:59 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS