24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
M
mikecr Offline OP
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
M
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
I'm tryin to put together a wildcat based rifle using Hi -BC bullets for any given bore. I run into the same wall regardless of cartridge configuration: desintegrating bullets above X-velocity.

Greenhill & more advanced twist calcs I've run into, hardly account for velocity. I see tons of supposedly successful load data out there with bullets/velocities/twists that others say will not reach the chrony before exploding. Bullet Manufacturers reccomend twist rates for their bullets without mention of any velocity ceilings or limitations. Same as with their posted BCs.

Would a nice fellow care to help me understand stabilization requirements?

A pathetic scenario:
A wildcat drives a Hi-BC bullet at 3800fps. The bullet explodes in the air.
The Mfg recommended 1-8" twist, and so that is how the barrel was cut.
But now, further discussion with Tech staff, reveals that their bullets weren't mean't for velocities above 3000fps(guess they forgot to mention that).
A quick scramble for another bullet ends in defeat. Turns out they all blow up when spun that fast(except $2/ea solids). Rather than pitching this expensive barrel, velocities are dropped via heavier bullets, or lower BC bullets (shorter)are used until they hold together. Wildcat advantage wash.

Questions:
Does bullet stabilization simply mean that it will point staight at a given RPS (REV/SEC), or is there more to it?
Is there any relationship between velocity and spin rate requirements?
Is the spin rate requirement per time? Or distance?
In the above scenario, would a 1-10" twist have been sufficient at 3800fps?
[Bullet [email]spinning4500rps3000fps1-8"[/email] -vs- [email]4560rps3800fps1-10"][/email]

I should say that I havent yet actually gone down this path.

Thank You
Mike






GB1

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,759
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,759
I'll take a crack at it. At the longer ranges where the bullet is arcing, an overstabilized bullet remains with its tip level(same level as it originally started) as it decends or drops, it will actually belly flop. On a properly stablized bullet, it's tip or nose will follow the bullets trajectory arc as it decends with less resistance, trajectory is supposedly flatter also. Now if you guys think this is B.S then take it up with Ken Howell, he wrote a nice article in the Varmint Hunter magazine. MtnHtr




Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,320
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,320
Our own Ken Howell gave a good explaination of twist rates and how they can stabalize and over-stabalize bullets. You might do a search for his explaination. Like most of Ken's information, it was excellent.


Rolly

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

81 members (6mmbrfan, 16penny, 10gaugemag, 338reddog, 17 invisible), 1,588 guests, and 798 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,760
Posts18,514,964
Members74,017
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.091s Queries: 19 (0.008s) Memory: 0.7975 MB (Peak: 0.8296 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-16 08:29:34 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS