24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
The worst thing any 3d party can do is run a candidate for president. That only splits the vote and guarantees the worst possible candidate gets elected. It's happened a number of times, most recently Woodrow Wilson and Bill Clinton, thanks to an independent candidate. What they need to do is put all their efforts into getting congressmen elected. They can do that state by state.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,003
U
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
U
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,003
Originally Posted by whackem_stackem
What would the "Patriot Party" offer that a already established partys like the Libertarian or Constitution Partys don't offer?
People don't understand how long it takes to put a ground game together and get on the ballot in all 50 states.
The Libertarian party can get 4% of the popular vote and even get one electoral vote and still get shut out of the debates.
The duopoly run the show.



The candidate has to be un-ignorable on the order of Ross Perot. Trump could do that for a Patriot Party. Also, I won't be surprised if the lp turns out to be a construct of the oligarchy to forestall the rise of a third party. And I've voted lp whenever they field a representative candidate for years.

I said a year ago we'd all wind up fighting for Trump as awful as he is. What a stupid world.


Living in a world of G17s and 700s, wishing for P7s and 202s
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
Trump would get crushed as a 3d party candidate. 100% of his votes would come from current republican voters, leaving both Trump and the R candidate woefully short of even the worst possible Dem candidate.
The only way for Trump to get reelected is to get the Republican nomination through whatever process it takes. Teddy Roosevelt tried it, too. He lost the R nomination so he started the Progressive (Bull Moose) party. All he did was get Woodrow Wilson elected.

The best Trump could do as a 3d party would be to pull a few EC votes and keep the Dem candidate from getting a majority. That would throw it into the house where he would get no votes at all. Rememer, in the house it's 1 vote/state. All the congressmen are R or D and Trump would get nothing.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Originally Posted by urbaneruralite
Originally Posted by whackem_stackem
What would the "Patriot Party" offer that a already established partys like the Libertarian or Constitution Partys don't offer?
People don't understand how long it takes to put a ground game together and get on the ballot in all 50 states.
The Libertarian party can get 4% of the popular vote and even get one electoral vote and still get shut out of the debates.
The duopoly run the show.



The candidate has to be un-ignorable on the order of Ross Perot. Trump could do that for a Patriot Party. Also, I won't be surprised if the lp turns out to be a construct of the oligarchy to forestall the rise of a third party. And I've voted lp whenever they field a representative candidate for years.

I said a year ago we'd all wind up fighting for Trump as awful as he is. What a stupid world.

I think you underestimate the power of the media to simply ignore what or who it doesn't want to acknowledge. Then, since people can't give anyone or anything any validity unless the media does, the person or thing or happening might as well not exist at all. There is no such thing as "un-ignorable" today. If Twitter and Facebook ban it, and Amazon won't sell it, and the MSM won't talk about it, it doesn't exist. They did a version of this to Trump, but rather than ignoring him (they can't ignore a POTUS), they misquoted him and made up endless conspiracies and called everything he did evil and everything he said bigoted.

What you need to realize is it doesn't matter the who or the what. The media will determine how people perceive it, or even whether they do.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 2
Want to ensure that conservatives never hold office?

It's easy - split the vote with a conservative 3rd party!

That's about the dumbest thing ever. If you really wanted to help conservatives, you'd be sending money to the Green Party before you even think about a conservative 3rd party.

This isn't difficult, folks.


Politics is War by Other Means
IC B2

Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Saying "No." For starters. To every single representative of government at every opportunity. Authority is given, and it is rescinded in exactly the same fashion. That's a good start. Then, if the shooting is going to start, they are going to start it, and it won't be a fair fight, because they never fight fair. But after a relative handful of necessary sacrifices, word will get around that none of them is going to give any of us any quarter, and all bets will be off. Then things will begin to change.

No political parties, no vote, no protests, no "insurrection". Just a bunch of individuals deciding, "No." Eventually, that "No" will grow so loud as to drown out every other voice, every bit of rhetoric.
Wouldn't "no" tend to bring us into a sort of Road Warrior state where we are always armed and holding watch so we are not snuck up on, like camping out in Vietnam in 1968? But I am already at the "No" point without holding watch.
It's not a "No" like anarchy. It's a "No" where legitimate govt entities such as cities, counties, etc. say "No" to Federal funding (or at least take the money and then refuse to implement the attached strings) and say "No" to Federal interference. The whole "sanctuary city" type stuff that Progs loved so well but are gonna hate when we implement them.

There's no violence needed by us, no anarchy involved, just using subsidiarity to assert our rights.
Heck, you could even claim you were doing your patriotic duty to help America by trying to save the Feds some money. smile

Last edited by Tyrone; 01/22/21.

Politics is War by Other Means
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Starting a third party won’t work.


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,408
Likes: 5
As I've said before...to be affective, a 3d party MUST NOT RUN A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT. That's a guaranteed loser. They need to put 100% of their efforts into electing congressmen. That's done state by state, not a national vote. Once they're elected, they can start working to get something done.
Even that's a rough trip. A Patriot party candidate for senator will likely split the R vote in the state, giving it to the D. There have been a few 3d party and independent congressmen who've won, though. Not even remotely close for president.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,842
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,842

A third party would have to differentiate itself enough from the party it's leaving so that it attracts more moderates from the party it's competing against. If the third party only attracts people from the party it is leaving then it is doomed to fail.

For example, a Patriot party would have to soften some of the republican core values to attract moderate democrats. The question to ask is if it would attract enough moderate democrats to outnumber the number of people staying with the republican party. The answer is usually No.

Last edited by Whiptail; 01/22/21.


Quando omni flunkus moritati
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

605 members (01Foreman400, 1OntarioJim, 1minute, 1234, 1badf350, 007FJ, 56 invisible), 2,440 guests, and 1,273 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,567
Posts18,491,832
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.248s Queries: 32 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8457 MB (Peak: 0.9036 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 19:46:51 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS