Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire " Ashi Babbitt " Shooting ?

he’s intimately familiar with dil dos

Bet he's a school teacher.

LOL

You also can't stop driving and texting
while drunk and now you even disagree
with FLETC.

To top it off you believe bubba Ribka
when he says " I double checked CP policy,
and it's the law .."

except that Policy is not Law.

The blind leading the blind.

I love that you think you know what you're talking about.

You clueless bitch.

You're kinda approaching something that might be an intelligent statement.

But you've still a ways to go.

RimFromTN has a chalk holder shaped like a dil do.

Lol.

LOVED the screen shot of an expired UoF policy manual.

LMAO

Ok. Quick review.

Is this Starfish or RimFromTN?

Protecting a federal installation.

Occupied by federal judges, and AUSA's.

How many deadly force scenarios resulted from those sieges? And keep in mind they lasted months. Not minutes.

Big deal , It was just a common example.
They still employ the term UOF. which
you claimed was bullchit.

You are like barbers, barmen and cab drivers
who "know so much" , but never went beyond
barber, barman or cab driver living off tips.

Uhhh, yeah dumb fugk.

"Use of Force."

Not to be confused with made up bullschit like "Fed LE Use of Force."

Do yourself a favor, and STFU.

You are hilarious. Please do not stop.






You failed to respond to this tape of that Mayor Moron.

And funny how all the video evidence of many physical assaults on Federal officers just disappeared off youboob.

Are not CP Federal ? So in the context of AshB,
are we discussing Fed.LE Use of Force?

You sure are petty and desperate.
Do you steal other people's peanuts
at the bar?

LOL

Just STFU.

You don’t know a GD thing. So stop trying.

Flav = No formal education and no profession
just fleabitten top dog of CF internet alleyway
telling others to STFU.

Your break downs of this shooting tell me all I need to know.

You’re FOS.

And you have ZERO knowledge on the 4th Amendment.

Strong effort, regardless.

LOL

Are you somehow of the opinion that it doesn't?

Detail your gripe concerning AshB
and 4th Amendment.




You already called it a legal shoot.
What else do we need to discuss?

So let's look at this through Graham v Connor.

Severity of the crime at issue?: riot, property destruction, trespass. I don't know if those actions are felonies in D.C.

Was the suspect resisting or attempting to flee?: I would say she was actively attempting to gain entrance with malicious intentions

Was the suspect an immediate threat to officers or other citizens?: I think anyone with a brain could articulate the ramifications if that barrier was breached. They weren't smashing through it to shake hands.

They siezed her.....permanently. Was it justified? Possibly. Just depends on how the soulless lawyers handle it