Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Accepted origins of Europeans being disputed

Excellent thread.

Africa was never the "cradle of humanity".

It was just the place where they was findin the oldest fossils.

Where is the "cradle of humanity" then?

Then you have the folks that migrated across the Bering Strait a while back.

Every couple decades it changes.

Bottom line nobody can pin it down.

Puts a big hole in the bottom of the evolutionary boat full of retards.

It does, but from a fixed point forward. The assumption that human diversity must have started in Africa because it is the more genetically diverse human population assumes we've evolved in a straight line from beginning to end with little disruption in between. But that doesn't appear to be the case. It is more likely that human evolution was subject to at least two cataclysmic events that killed off significant segments of the population. Probably more than two if consider localized near-extinction events.

You could make the same argument genetic diversity argument for reptiles. But of course we know that retiles were once wildly more diverse with some as big as a house. They are less diverse now but only because they were killed back to near extinction and had to recover.

Fascinating.

I keep wanting to get a copy of this book, but it's hard to find:

let's see ol noah and his kids and inlaws...after the giants were kilt off. was adam and eve giants or just their descendents bred with giants. lot's of stories flying around out there now.

Looks like he lead quite a life

7,000 yo Caucasian (??) from Spain. Blue eyes and dark skin, closest living relatives Scandinavians.

Lactose intolerant I understand, but inability to digest starch is a puzzle, dafugg did he eat?

I found this when I was googling for the remains of a similarly archaic girl found in Scandinavia, likewise dark skin blue eyes. It was in the news not that long ago.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-25885519

Here’s another, the first Brit, 10,000 years ago, still ain’t found the Scandinavian girl....

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...light-eyes-dna-analysis-shows-180968097/

Think about that for a minute: What starch would be eat? No taters. No rice. Wheat and barley farming was only just being invented in the Fertile Crescent. So, he ate what Mother Nature offered. Critters, fish, shellfish, greens, berries in season, and nuts. Maybe a tuber or an onion.

Starch is a very cheap way to provide calories, but it’s not really food....

"fossil fuel" is a theory, same kinda BS

Some of them had to be dragged out, kicking and screaming. And the thanks we get. Hmmph!!

Screaming I din du nuffin

might i add 'holding a watermelon'

Don’t seem to much matter were who came from , look at were we’re at .
Fuggin wonderful ain’t it ?
Kenneth

I’m not from Africa? OMG!

outer space...