|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,828
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,828 |
I haven't shopped binocs in a long time, happy with my Zeiss Victorys, but have a need to procure retirement gifts for a couple of partners here. Thinking about getting each of them some Alpha glass.
Does anyone have experience with the RF offerings from Leica, Zeiss, or Swaro?
"Miss Jean Louise, stand up. Your father's passin.'"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,406
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,406 |
As a long standing supporting vendor here on the forum it would be our pleasure to discuss this with you and help figure out which would suit your intended use the best. If you've got a few minutes give us a call, 516-217-1000 Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,944
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,944 |
All that I compared to the same make and quality level from the alpha companies showed a very slight optical compromise, to my eyes anyhow. As such, I stick with a separate rangefinder from the binocular.
In terms of glass, I liked the Leica Noctivid best, and Doug and Neal hooked me up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478 |
I have used the Leica geovids for a long time. Excellent glass, excellent range finding capabilities. I would highly recommend them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662 |
I have used the Leica geovids for a long time. Excellent glass, excellent range finding capabilities. I would highly recommend them. I switched from Swarovski glass to Leica Geovid range finder Binoculars because I felt their range read outs were easier for me to read.. optic quality were both excellent.
Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,218 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,218 Likes: 1 |
+1 on the Lecia Geovids. I got a smoking deal on a demo pair from Doug/Cameraland a few years back. 8x42's for me. I cannot tell the difference in glass from my Ultravids.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,369
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,369 |
I agree on the Geovids. I have ultravids and douvids to compare.
MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,672 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,672 Likes: 3 |
I must also say the Geovids are awesome.........but the Swaro's are sweet, for regular bino's I love Zeiss but think they are a step behind in the RF category
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,608
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,608 |
Lecia Geovids here and very happy with them.
Never take life to seriously, after all ,no one gets out of it alive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,130 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,130 Likes: 3 |
Yes. Leica and swaro. Once you use them you will not go back
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,486 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,486 Likes: 1 |
I’ve had Geovids and currently have the Zeiss. Very happy with both and it’s a matter of personal preference at that level as far as I’m concerned
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
Have had great results, both optically and range-finding, with a 10x40 Zeiss Victory RF. Hard to tell the difference optically between them and the non-RF.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 317
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 317 |
My 2 cents for the Swarovski EL Range. The overall package just fits me better but having looked through Leica and Zeiss Victory you cannot go wrong with any of them.
Another vote to give Doug at Camera Land a call
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,478 |
I have used the Leica geovids for a long time. Excellent glass, excellent range finding capabilities. I would highly recommend them. I switched from Swarovski glass to Leica Geovid range finder Binoculars because I felt their range read outs were easier for me to read.. optic quality were both excellent. I have only got to use 1 Swarovski rf bino. The glass was very good, but the rangefinder was not as strong as the Leica HD b . It wouldn't range as far, or as easily as the Leica. But that was only one set, and it was 3 or 4 years ago, so keep that in mind.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,402 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,402 Likes: 1 |
Although I've not spent time with the latest Zeiss RF Bino, I've been lucky enough to own most of the top Swarovski and Leica binos, including both the older and the latest Swaro EL Ranges and even the NL Pures. When not needing a RF I still am very happy with the view through my Swaro 8.5x42 SV's, but when it comes to hunting I continue use my old Geovid HD-R's and compared to the other's I've come to realize I just can't see enough difference to warrant a change. I am not a long range hunter so I don't need all the ballistic functions and the simplicity and durability of my Geovids still impress. I'm not saying the NL Pures / EL Range TA's didn't offer a slightly better view and surely more FOV, but after many days of comparing, to my 54 year old eyes the difference wasn't shocking. Lastly of all the binos I've had, the Geovids still have the best focusing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385 Likes: 3
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385 Likes: 3 |
I have used the Leica geovids for a long time. Excellent glass, excellent range finding capabilities. I would highly recommend them. I switched from Swarovski glass to Leica Geovid range finder Binoculars because I felt their range read outs were easier for me to read.. optic quality were both excellent. I have only got to use 1 Swarovski rf bino. The glass was very good, but the rangefinder was not as strong as the Leica HD b . It wouldn't range as far, or as easily as the Leica. But that was only one set, and it was 3 or 4 years ago, so keep that in mind. This all changed as of January 2021, Swarovski put Swarovision in their EL rangefinding binoculars, put the button on the right side, improved readout, and has the ability to range and locate a point that you can download onto your iPhone and find the spot you ranged on the iPhone.
I was thinking the other day how much I used to hate Bill Clinton. He was freaking George Washington compared to what they are now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,140
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,140 |
Anxious to see the Meopta offering
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,892
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,892 |
Had the Geovids and move to the Zeiss in 2012. At the time, the Zeiss ranged more reliably in inclement weather.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,152 Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,152 Likes: 5 |
FWIW, I’ve had all those names in bino’s at one time or another. Presently and for quite awhile now I’ve been using Zeiss’ RF Victory 8x45 T*’s acquired from CameraLand years ago.
While I’ve not done side-to-side comparisons, and while fairly heavy, I’ve been very satisfied with them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,761
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,761 |
I really like the new Zeiss RF, in 10x42.
|
|
|
|
511 members (1OntarioJim, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1Longbow, 1badf350, 17CalFan, 44 invisible),
2,307
guests, and
1,237
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,333
Posts18,526,732
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|