|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210 |
I ordered TTSXs but received TAC-TXs, which apparently are designed to expand at 300 BO velocities. I was intending to load the TTSXs to 3000+ in my 308 and 30-06 for deer. I have had great success with the 80gr TTSX in my 257 loaded to around 3250fps. Before I return the TAC-TXs, I thought I would check to see if anyone has used them pushed much faster than intended. I did email Barnes but haven't heard back. The 110 TTSXs are out-of-stock everywhere, so it would be great if these will work. I'm curious about their accuracy potential and terminal performance at high velocity. Thanks in advance.
Presidents come and go, but entitlements are forever - Michael Medved
Our forefathers would be shooting by now
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755 |
My understanding is the TAC-TX is just a TTSX that is "tad better quality" ( balance/weight,etc) but essentially the same. Have no fear, drive them as hard as you can!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070 |
The 100 TAC-TX has a bit of a different profile than the 110 TTSX. I haven't used them in 308, but tried both in my 300BO and ended up going with the TTSX because the accuracy was better in my rifle.
I just did the old milk jug tests on both, and results at 50 yards were about the same with both, but that is at snail speed compared to what they'd be zinging out of a 308. Only thing I've shot with them is coyote, though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210 |
Thanks for the info; interesting accuracy was better with the TTSX.
Presidents come and go, but entitlements are forever - Michael Medved
Our forefathers would be shooting by now
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070 |
Thanks for the info; interesting accuracy was better with the TTSX. Rifles are very much individuals, so if I had grabbed the one on the shelf next to mine when I bought it, it may have preferred the TAC-TX. It wasn't a huge difference in accuracy, about .25 MOA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 656
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 656 |
I don't know about the .308 bullets, but the Barnes 300gr 458 SOCOM bullet is sold in both flavors, TTSX and TAC-TX.....per Barnes, they are the exact same bullet sold under two different names.
Tony
Run it up, until you blow it up, then back it down a bit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,070 |
The .308 110s are not the same. The TAC-TX has a single groove compared to 2 on the TTSX and they're a bit more tail heavy than the TTSX. TTSX advertised BC is .295, and .289 for the TAC.
I shot up all the TACs I had, or I'd do a side by side comparison
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,292
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,292 |
Shooting the tac bullets in Ruger ranch , got groups that never got bigger than .75” TTSX’s ran 3/4” to 1.5” , both setting on 20gr lil gun . In the Ruger compact 308 , both bullets ran around 1” to 1.5” . Setting on 50gr Tac . Have not shot any game with them yet , but will soon wash them in deer blood . We will see , Kenneth
|
|
|
|
547 members (10gaugemag, 007FJ, 1lesfox, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 52 invisible),
2,607
guests, and
1,337
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,290
Posts18,525,712
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|