24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back #16543212 10/19/21
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 2,527
W
Wannabebwana Offline OP
Campfire Guide
OP Offline
Campfire Guide
W
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 2,527
https://www.commentary.org/articles/bari-weiss/resist-woke-revolution/

Too long to cut and paste the article, but worth the read.

BP-B2

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16543226 10/19/21
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 38,670
J
Jim_Conrad Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 38,670
Somebody must be fugging up her pay day.

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Jim_Conrad] #16543270 10/19/21
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,269
gonehuntin Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,269
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Somebody must be fugging up her pay day.


It's (((Bari Weiss))), formerly of the New York Times. They turned on her, so now she's turning on them. Commies do that to each other.


"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

We are all Rhodesians now.






Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16543438 10/19/21
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,467
Boarmaster123 Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,467
Well we got people like her to thank for helping to usher in this crap. As bad as all my old buddies I grew up with that voted Democrat because the union told them to right up until Trump. Now the same guys are on social media railing on the same democrat policies they helped get a foothold for three decades. Some have even taken to lecturing to those of us that been fighting those same policies for three decades. I welcome their change of heart but I remind them they brought this ugly btch to the party.


Life can be rough on us dreamers.
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: gonehuntin] #16543457 10/19/21
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 810
B
BuckHaggard Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 810
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Somebody must be fugging up her pay day.


It's (((Bari Weiss))), formerly of the New York Times. They turned on her, so now she's turning on them. Commies do that to each other.


You obviously know nothing about her since she has never been part of the woke mob.

IC-A

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16543622 10/19/21
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,367
B
Burleyboy Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,367
That was worth the read. Regardless of what she said in the past she spoke some solid truth there.


Bb

Last edited by Burleyboy; 10/19/21.
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16543625 10/19/21
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 38,670
J
Jim_Conrad Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 38,670
Golly...that Bill Mahre and Tulsi Gabbard sure make a lot of sense too.

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16544154 10/19/21
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11,595
DMc Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11,595
Mine says to subscribe to read....

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16544168 10/19/21
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,358
W
wilkeshunter Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
W
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,358
Laffin.....It’s time, huh? We are loooong overdue.

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16544833 10/20/21
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 18,413
KFWA Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 18,413
I think that's a great read


R.I.P. Ethan
IC-B

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16544879 10/20/21
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
STRSWilson Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 490
She nailed it with:

Quote

In this ideology, speech is violence. But violence, when carried out by the right people in pursuit of a just cause, is not violence at all. In this ideology, bullying is wrong, unless you are bullying the right people, in which case it’s very, very good. In this ideology, education is not about teaching people how to think, it’s about reeducating them in what to think. In this ideology, the need to feel safe trumps the need to speak truthfully.

Last edited by STRSWilson; 10/20/21.

Setting The Record Straight
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: STRSWilson] #16545014 10/20/21
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 30,685
local_dirt Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 30,685
Originally Posted by STRSWilson
So the creators of the mob monster have lost control and are now speaking out against the mob monster?

How fitting.






Somebody needs to say it. The woke joke needs to be exposed, frequently and vehemently.

Liberals won't listen to "us", and they hate / won't listen to Tucker.



She is on Substack, the same platform as Glenn Greenwald, who is frequently on Tucker. Greenwald is a former democrat who made his bones exposing the spying on Americans activities of the NSA.

Last edited by local_dirt; 10/20/21.


Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want.

GOA member
disappointed NRA member

24HCF SEARCH
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16545030 10/20/21
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 18,413
KFWA Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 18,413
Another article along those same lines

I do not know who John McWhorter is (and if you plan on giving me schit for this either way, I do not care) , this was sent to me and I thought he had some valid points


https://johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/the-elect-neoracists-posing-as-antiracists


The Third Wave Antiracist is deeply moved, for example, by a conglomeration of tenets which, stated clearly and placed in simple oppositions, translate into nothing whatsoever:

1. When black people say you have

insulted them, apologize with

profound sincerity and guilt.

BUT …

Don’t put black people in a position where

you expect them to forgive you. They

have dealt with too much to be expected to.


2. Don’t assume that all, or even most,

black people like hiphop or are

good dancers and so on. Black

people are a conglomeration of disparate

individuals. “Black

culture” is code for “path-

ological, primitive ghetto people.”

BUT …

Don’t expect black people to assimilate to

“white” social norms because black people

have a culture of their own.


3. Silence about racism is violence.

BUT …

Elevate the voices of the oppressed over

your own.


4. You must strive eternally to

understand the experiences of black

people.

BUT …

You can never understand what it is to

be black, and if you think you do you’re

a racist.


5. Show interest in multiculturalism.

BUT …

Do not culturally appropriate.

What is not your culture is not for you,

and you may not try it or do it.

Yet – if you aren’t nevertheless interested in it,

you are a racist.


6. Support black people in creating

their own spaces and stay out of

them.

BUT …

Seek to have black friends. If you

don’t have any, you’re a racist. And

if you claim any, they’d better be good

friends – in their private spaces you aren’t

allowed in.


7. When whites move away from

black neighborhoods it’s

white flight.

BUT …

When whites move into black

neighborhoods it’s gentrification, even

when they pay black residents generously for their houses.


8. If you’re white and only date

white people you’re a racist.

BUT …

If you’re white and date a black person

you are, if only deep down, exotifying an


“other.”

9. Black people cannot be held

accountable for everything

every black person does.

BUT …

All whites must acknowledge their

personal complicitness in the perdify

throughout history of “whiteness.”



10. Black students must be

admitted to schools via

adjusted grade and test score

standards to ensure a represen-

tative number of them and foster

a diversity of views in classrooms.

BUT …

It is racist to assume a black student

was admitted to a school via racial

preferences, and racist to expect them

to represent the “diverse” view in

classroom discussions.

Last edited by KFWA; 10/20/21.

R.I.P. Ethan
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: KFWA] #16545043 10/20/21
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 99,743
D
deflave Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 99,743
Originally Posted by KFWA
I think that's a great read


What an endorsement.


For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:16
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16545158 10/20/21
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 22,364
hatari Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 22,364
IT is a good read. Like Caesar the ape in Planet of the Apes, Weis is the first of the liberal voices to say "NO!".

She was forced out at the NYTimes for calling out the double standard of Wokeness. It was shocking to the NYT staff that a female NY Jew would not whole heartedly endorse this movement and they bullied her right off the staff.

She has something to say about the absurdity of the Woke movement. She's hitting the nail on the head.


"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017

"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: hatari] #16545210 10/20/21
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 99,743
D
deflave Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 99,743
Originally Posted by hatari
IT is a good read. Like Caesar the ape in Planet of the Apes, Weis is the first of the liberal voices to say "NO!".

She was forced out at the NYTimes for calling out the double standard of Wokeness. It was shocking to the NYT staff that a female NY Jew would not whole heartedly endorse this movement and they bullied her right off the staff.

She has something to say about the absurdity of the Woke movement. She's hitting the nail on the head.


Yeah.

LOL


For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:16
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16545219 10/20/21
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,368
O
oldtrapper Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,368
Pretty good assessment of the problem and solution. She forgot that this is all part of the cultural marxist long march through the institutions. Indeed, we know with great certainty where this goes, by design.


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Soli Deo Gloria

democrats ARE the plague.

Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: Wannabebwana] #16545377 10/20/21
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,135
rte Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,135
A lot of people want to convince you that you need a Ph.D. or a law degree or dozens of hours of free time to read dense texts about critical theory to understand the woke movement and its worldview. You do not. You simply need to believe your own eyes and ears.

Let me offer the briefest overview of the core beliefs of the Woke Revolution, which are abundantly clear to anyone willing to look past the hashtags and the jargon.

It begins by stipulating that the forces of justice and progress are in a war against backwardness and tyranny. And in a war, the normal rules of the game must be suspended. Indeed, this ideology would argue that those rules are not just obstacles to justice, but tools of oppression. They are the master’s tools. And the master’s tools cannot dismantle the master’s house.

So the tools themselves are not just replaced but repudiated. And in so doing, persuasion—the purpose of argument—is replaced with public shaming. Moral complexity is replaced with moral certainty. Facts are replaced with feelings.

Ideas are replaced with identity. Forgiveness is replaced with punishment. Debate is replaced with de-platforming. Diversity is replaced with homogeneity of thought. Inclusion, with exclusion.

In this ideology, speech is violence. But violence, when carried out by the right people in pursuit of a just cause, is not violence at all. In this ideology, bullying is wrong, unless you are bullying the right people, in which case it’s very, very good. In this ideology, education is not about teaching people how to think, it’s about reeducating them in what to think. In this ideology, the need to feel safe trumps the need to speak truthfully.

In this ideology, if you do not tweet the right tweet or share the right slogan, your whole life can be ruined. Just ask Tiffany Riley, a Vermont school principal who was fired—fired—because she said she supports black lives but not the organization Black Lives Matter.

In this ideology, the past cannot be understood on its own terms, but must be judged through the morals and mores of the present. It is why statues of Grant and Washington are being torn down. And it is why William Peris, a UCLA lecturer and an Air Force veteran, was investigated for reading Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” out loud in class.

In this ideology, intentions don’t matter. That is why Emmanuel Cafferty, a Hispanic utility worker at San Diego Gas and Electric, was fired for making what someone said he thought was a white-supremacist hand gesture—when in fact he was cracking his knuckles out of his car window.

In this ideology, the equality of opportunity is replaced with equality of outcome as a measure of fairness. If everyone doesn’t finish the race at the same time, the course must have been defective. Thus, the argument to get rid of the SAT. Or the admissions tests for public schools like Stuyvesant in New York or Lowell in San Francisco.

In this ideology, you are guilty for the sins of your fathers. In other words: You are not you. You are only a mere avatar of your race or your religion or your class. That is why third-graders in Cupertino, California, were asked to rate themselves in terms of their power and privilege. In third grade.

In this system, we are all placed neatly on a spectrum of “privileged” to “oppressed.” We are ranked somewhere on this spectrum in different categories: race, gender, sexual orientation, and class. Then we are given an overall score, based on the sum of these rankings. Having privilege means that your character and your ideas are tainted. This is why, one high-schooler in New York tells me, students in his school are told, “If you are white and male, you are second in line to speak.” This is considered a normal and necessary redistribution of power.

Racism has been redefined. It is no longer about discrimination based on the color of someone’s skin. Racism is any system that allows for disparate outcomes between racial groups. If disparity is present, as the high priest of this ideology, Ibram X. Kendi, has explained, racism is present. According to this totalizing new view, we are all either racist or anti-racist. To be a Good Person and not a Bad Person, you must be an “anti-racist.” There is no neutrality. There is no such thing as “not racist.”

Most important: In this revolution, skeptics of any part of this radical ideology are recast as heretics. Those who do not abide by every single aspect of its creed are tarnished as bigots, subjected to boycotts and their work to political litmus tests. The Enlightenment, as the critic Edward Rothstein has put it, has been replaced by the exorcism.

What we call “cancel culture” is really the justice system of this revolution. And the goal of the cancellations is not merely to punish the person being cancelled. The goal is to send a message to everyone else: Step out of line and you are next.

It has worked. A recent CATO study found that 62 percent of Americans are afraid to voice their true views. Nearly a quarter of American academics endorse ousting a colleague for having a wrong opinion about hot-button issues such as immigration or gender differences. And nearly 70 percent of students favor reporting professors if the professor says something that students find offensive, according to a Challey Institute for Global Innovation survey.

Why are so many, especially so many young people, drawn to this ideology? It’s not because they are dumb. Or because they are snowflakes, or whatever Fox talking points would have you believe. All of this has taken place against the backdrop of major changes in American life—the tearing apart of our social fabric; the loss of religion and the decline of civic organizations; the opioid crisis; the collapse of American industries; the rise of big tech; successive financial crises; a toxic public discourse; crushing student debt. An epidemic of loneliness. A crisis of meaning. A pandemic of distrust. It has taken place against the backdrop of the American dream’s decline into what feels like a punchline, the inequalities of our supposedly fair, liberal meritocracy clearly rigged in favor of some people and against others. And so on.

“I became converted because I was ripe for it and lived in a disintegrating society thrusting for faith.” That was Arthur Koestler writing in 1949 about his love affair with Communism. The same might be said of this new revolutionary faith. And like other religions at their inception, this one has lit on fire the souls of true believers, eager to burn down anything or anyone that stands in its way.

If you have ever tried to build something, even something small, you know how hard it is. It takes time. It takes tremendous effort. But tearing things down? That’s quick work.

The Woke Revolution has been exceptionally effective. It has successfully captured the most important sense-making institutions of American life: our newspapers. Our magazines. Our Hollywood studios. Our publishing houses. Many of our tech companies. And, increasingly, corporate America.

Just as in China under Chairman Mao, the seeds of our own cultural revolution can be traced to the academy, the first of our institutions to be overtaken by it. And our schools—public, private, parochial—are increasingly the recruiting grounds for this ideological army.

A few stories are worth recounting:

David Peterson is an art professor at Skidmore College in upstate New York. He stood accused in the fevered summer of 2020 of “engaging in hateful conduct that threatens Black Skidmore students.”

What was that hateful conduct? David and his wife, Andrea, went to watch a rally for police officers. “Given the painful events that continue to unfold across this nation, I guess we just felt compelled to see first-hand how all of this was playing out in our own community,” he told the Skidmore student newspaper. David and his wife stayed for 20 minutes on the edge of the event. They held no signs, participated in no chants. They just watched. Then they left for dinner.

For the crime of listening, David Peterson’s class was boycotted. A sign appeared on his classroom door: “STOP. By entering this class you are crossing a campus-wide picket line and breaking the boycott against Professor David Peterson. This is not a safe environment for marginalized students.” Then the university opened an investigation into accusations of bias in the classroom.

Across the country from Skidmore, at the University of Southern California, a man named Greg Patton is a professor of business communication. In 2020, Patton was teaching a class on “filler words”—such as “um” and “like” and so forth for his master’s-level course on communication for management. It turns out that the Chinese word for “like” sounds like the n-word. Students wrote the school’s staff and administration accusing their professor of “negligence and disregard.” They added: “We are burdened to fight with our existence in society, in the workplace, and in America. We should not be made to fight for our sense of peace and mental well-being” at school.

In a normal, reality-based world, there is only one response to such a claim: You misheard. But that was not the response. This was: “It is simply unacceptable for faculty to use words in class that can marginalize, hurt and harm the psychological safety of our students,” the dean, Geoffrey Garrett wrote. “Understandably, this caused great pain and upset among students, and for that I am deeply sorry.”

This rot hasn’t been contained to higher education. At a mandatory training earlier this year in the San Diego Unified School District, Bettina Love, an education professor who believes that children learn better from teachers of the same race, accused white teachers of “spirit murdering black and brown children” and urged them to undergo “antiracist therapy for White educators.”

San Francisco’s public schools didn’t manage to open their schools during the pandemic, but the board decided to rename 44 schools—including those named for George Washington and John Muir—before suspending the plan. Meantime, one of the board members declared merit “racist” and “Trumpian.”

A recent educational program for sixth to eighth grade teachers called “a pathway to equitable math instruction”—funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation—was recently sent to Oregon teachers by the state’s Department of Education. The program’s literature informs teachers that white supremacy shows up in math instruction when “rigor is expressed only in difficulty,” and “contrived word problems are valued over the math in students’ lived experiences.”

Serious education is the antidote to such ignorance. Frederick Douglass said, “Education means emancipation. It means light and liberty. It means the uplifting of the soul of man into the glorious light of truth, the light only by which men can be free.” Soaring words that feel as if they are a report from a distant galaxy. Education is increasingly where debate, dissent, and discovery go to die.

It’s also very bad for kids. For those deemed “privileged,” it creates a hostile environment where kids are too intimidated to participate. For those deemed “oppressed,” it inculcates an extraordinarily pessimistic view of the world, where students are trained to perceive malice and bigotry in everything they see. They are denied the dignity of equal standards and expectations. They are denied the belief in their own agency and ability to succeed. As Zaid Jilani had put it: “You cannot have power without responsibility. Denying minorities responsibility for their own actions, both good and bad, will only deny us the power we rightly deserve.”

How did we get here? There are a lot of factors that are relevant to the answer: institutional decay; the tech revolution and the monopolies it created; the arrogance of our elites; poverty; the death of trust. And all of these must be examined, because without them we would have neither the far right nor the cultural revolutionaries now clamoring at America’s gates.

But there is one word we should linger on, because every moment of radical victory turned on it. The word is cowardice.

The revolution has been met with almost no resistance by those who have the title CEO or leader or president or principal in front of their names. The refusal of the adults in the room to speak the truth, their refusal to say no to efforts to undermine the mission of their institutions, their fear of being called a bad name and that fear trumping their responsibility—that is how we got here.

Allan Bloom had the radicals of the 1960s in mind when he wrote that “a few students discovered that pompous teachers who catechized them about academic freedom could, with a little shove, be made into dancing bears.” Now, a half-century later, those dancing bears hold named chairs at every important elite, sense-making institution in the country.

As Douglas Murray has put it: “The problem is not that the sacrificial victim is selected. The problem is that the people who destroy his reputation are permitted to do so by the complicity, silence and slinking away of everybody else.”

Each surely thought: These protestors have some merit! This institution, this university, this school, hasn’t lived up to all of its principles at all times! We have been racist! We have been sexist! We haven’t always been enlightened! I’ll give a bit and we’ll find a way to compromise. This turned out to be as naive as Robespierre thinking that he could avoid the guillotine.

Think about each of the anecdotes I’ve shared here and all the rest you already know. All that had to change for the entire story to turn out differently was for the person in charge, the person tasked with being a steward for the newspaper or the magazine or the college or the school district or the private high school or the kindergarten, to say: No.

If cowardice is the thing that has allowed for all of this, the force that stops this cultural revolution can also be summed up by one word: courage. And courage often comes from people you would not expect.

Consider Maud Maron. Maron is a lifelong liberal who has always walked the walk. She was an escort for Planned Parenthood; a law-school research assistant to Kathleen Cleaver, the former Black Panther; and a poll watcher for John Kerry in Pennsylvania during the 2004 presidential election. In 2016, she was a regular contributor to Bernie Sanders’s campaign.

Maron dedicated her career to Legal Aid: “For me, being a public defender is more than a job,” she told me. “It’s who I am.”

But things took a turn when, this past year, Maron spoke out passionately and publicly about the illiberalism that has gripped the New York City public schools attended by her four children.

“I am very open about what I stand for,” she told me. “I am pro-integration. I am pro-diversity. And also I reject the narrative that white parents are to blame for the failures of our school system. I object to the mayor’s proposal to get rid of specialized admissions tests to schools like Stuyvesant. And I believe that racial essentialism is racist and should not be taught in school.”

What followed this apparent thought crime was a 21st-century witch hunt. Maron was smeared publicly by her colleagues. They called her “racist, and openly so.” They said, “We’re ashamed that she works for the Legal Aid Society.”

Most people would have walked away and quietly found a new job. Not Maud Maron. This summer, she filed suit against the organization, claiming that she was forced out of Legal Aid because of her political views and her race, a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

“The reason they went after me is that I have a different point of view,” she said. “These ideologues have tried to ruin my name and my career, and they are going after other good people. Not enough people stand up and say: It is totally wrong to do this to a person. And this is not going to stop unless people stand up to it.”

That’s courage.

Courage also looks like Paul Rossi, the math teacher at Grace Church High School in New York who raised questions about this ideology at a mandatory, whites-only student and faculty Zoom meeting. A few days later, all the school’s advisers were required to read a public reprimand of his conduct out loud to every student in the school. Unwilling to disavow his beliefs, Rossi blew the whistle: “I know that by attaching my name to this I’m risking not only my current job but my career as an educator, since most schools, both public and private, are now captive to this backward ideology. But witnessing the harmful impact it has on children, I can’t stay silent.” That’s courage.

Courage is Xi Van Fleet, a Virginia mom who endured Mao’s Cultural Revolution as a child and spoke up to the Loudoun County School Board at a public meeting in June. “You are training our children to loathe our country and our history,” she said in front of the school board. “Growing up in Mao’s China, all of this feels very familiar…. The only difference is that they used class instead of race.”

Gordon Klein, a professor at UCLA, recently filed suit against his own university. Why? A student asked him to grade black students with “greater leniency.” He refused, given that such a racial preference would violate UCLA’s anti-discrimination policies (and maybe even the law). But the people in charge of UCLA’s Anderson School launched a racial-discrimination complaint into him. They denounced him, banned him from campus, appointed a monitor to look at his emails, and suspended him. He eventually was reinstated—because he had done absolutely nothing wrong—but not before his reputation and career were severely damaged. “I don’t want to see anyone else’s life destroyed as they attempted to do to me,” Klein told me. “Few have the intestinal fortitude to fight cancel culture. I do. This is about sending a message to every petty tyrant out there.”

Courage is Peter Boghossian. He recently resigned his post at Portland State University, writing in a letter to his provost: “The university transformed a bastion of free inquiry into a social justice factory whose only inputs were race, gender and victimhood and whose only output was grievance and division…. I feel morally obligated to make this choice. For ten years, I have taught my students the importance of living by your principles. One of mine is to defend our system of liberal education from those who seek to destroy it. Who would I be if I didn’t?”

Who would I be if I didn’t?

George Orwell said that “the further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” In an age of lies, telling the truth is high risk. It comes with a cost. But it is our moral obligation.

It is our duty to resist the crowd in this age of mob thinking. It is our duty to think freely in an age of conformity. It is our duty to speak truth in an age of lies.

This bravery isn’t the last or only step in opposing this revolution—it’s just the first. After that must come honest assessments of why America was vulnerable to start with, and an aggressive commitment to rebuilding the economy and society in ways that once again offer life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to the greatest number of Americans.

But let’s start with a little courage.

Courage means, first off, the unqualified rejection of lies. Do not speak untruths, either about yourself or anyone else, no matter the comfort offered by the mob. And do not genially accept the lies told to you. If possible, be vocal in rejecting claims you know to be false. Courage can be contagious, and your example may serve as a means of transmission.

When you’re told that traits such as industriousness and punctuality are the legacy of white supremacy, don’t hesitate to reject it. When you’re told that statues of figures such as Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are offensive, explain that they are national heroes. When you’re told that “nothing has changed” in this country for minorities, don’t dishonor the memory of civil-rights pioneers by agreeing. And when you’re told that America was founded in order to perpetuate slavery, don’t take part in rewriting the country’s history.

America is imperfect. I always knew it, as we all do—and the past few years have rocked my faith like no others in my lifetime. But America and we Americans are far from irredeemable.

The motto of Frederick Douglass’s anti-slavery paper, the North Star—“The Right is of no Sex—Truth is of no Color—God is the Father of us all, and all we are brethren”—must remain all of ours.

We can still feel the pull of that electric cord Lincoln talked about 163 years ago—the one “in that Declaration that links the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving men together, that will link those patriotic hearts as long as the love of freedom exists in the minds of men throughout the world.”

Every day I hear from people who are living in fear in the freest society humankind has ever known. Dissidents in a democracy, practicing doublespeak. That is what is happening right now. What happens five, 10, 20 years from now if we don’t speak up and defend the ideas that have made all of our lives possible?

Liberty. Equality. Freedom. Dignity. These are ideas worth fighting for.


Communist Goals

26. Present homosexuality and degeneracy as normal.
27. Discredit the Bible.
28. Eliminate prayer in the schools.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1561529/posts
Re: One of the original proponents of wokeness says its time to fight back [Re: BuckHaggard] #16545536 10/20/21
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,886
Stickfight Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,886
Originally Posted by BuckHaggard
You obviously know nothing about her since she has never been part of the woke mob.


He knows she is a Jew, so what else does he really need to know to be sure she is up to no good?

Listen to her on Rogan’s podcast. She is clearly either an imbecile or engaged in some Jewish sorcery to convince people she is to support her scheming.


Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RR1
Who's Online Now
757 registered members (16penny, 10gaugemag, 160user, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 1936M71, 71 invisible), 2,414 guests, and 908 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
RR2/3










Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2022 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.074s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8900 MB (Peak: 1.1085 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-12-03 15:44:46 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS