Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Graphene Oxide

My dad took high dose D when he was trying to fight his cancer along with the other typical treatments. Funny thing is, a couple weeks after he started dosage, he got dramatically better. Cancer free now. I guess it's just a coincidence.

Do you have a large scale double blind clinical trail you can site, or am I just supposed to accept your single anecdote as proof?

The saddest part about this forum getting all these nut jobs is that it's supposed to be a hunting, shooting, and outdoor forum.

Anyone from outside who visits here will come away with the idea that hunters and shooters are a bunch of whack jobs.

Just more fodder for the leftists.

Spiritual warfare.

Learn discernment so you know who sees the truth and who propagates the lies.

Posting an article is not nutty. Believing every conspiracy theory you read on the internet (as long as it fits your preconceived notions is.

Believing that Sandy Hook was a false flag is. The list goes on.

Expand upon "high dose" before I call you an idiot

CAUTION

This is one of the most dangerous mouse and rat poisons on the market. Cholecalciferol, or activated vitamin D3, causes a life-threateningly high calcium and phosphorus level in the body, resulting in severe, acute kidney failure, cardiovascular abnormalities, and tissue mineralization. This can progress to life-threatening disease. Even though this is a vitamin, it is toxic to dogs, cats, and children as well as rodents. Human vitamin D3 supplements taken at high enough doses are also toxic via this same mechanism.
Clinical Signs

Signs typically begin 12-24 hours after ingestion and may be non-specific at the onset. While the renal system is often most acutely affected, eventually the cardiac, pulmonary GI and CNS systems may be as well.

0-24 hours: Increased thirst and urination, hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia

12-48 hours: Anorexia, vomiting, weakness, lethargy, melena (black stool with digested blood)

2-4 days: Acute kidney failure

3-5 days: Depression, frank bloody diarrhea, hematuria, prominent bradycardia, death

There is no antidote for cholecalciferol mouse and rat poison and. This is one of the most challenging poisoning cases to treat. Prolonged hospitalization and frequent laboratory monitoring are required. For recent ingestions (within a few hours), aggressive decontamination with emesis (induced vomiting) and repeated doses of activated charcoal are recommended. For patients who are already symptomatic, treatment includes aggressive IV fluids and specific drugs (e.g., diuretics, steroids, calcitonin and bisphosphonates) to decrease calcium levels in the body. It is vital to bring the calcium level down as quickly as possible to avoid permanent tissue mineralization and organ damage. Frequent monitoring of blood work (calcium, phosphorus, and kidney values) is needed on a daily basis during treatment and for a period of at least 2-6 weeks after ingestion.

Unfortunately, cholecalciferol has a very narrow margin of safety, which means that ingestion of even a small amount of this poison can result in severe clinical signs or death. Toxic ingestions must be treated quickly and appropriately to prevent kidney failure and tissue mineralization. Poisoned patients will require ongoing therapy for months even after they are discharged from the hospital.

Products are Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol) marketed in 0.075% concentration (e.g., Quintox®, Rampage®) as pellets, grain mixes, place packs or bait blocks. Toxicity develops with very small amounts ingested (approximately 1 tbsp of bait for a 40 lb dog). Human vitamin D3 supplements (both prescription strength and over-the-counter) are also toxic at high doses.

If you think your pet may have ingested cholecalciferol bait or vitamin D3 please seek treatment immediately.

I'm not looking to get into it with you this early in the morning (maybe later? LOL) but how can you dismiss the information in the article? It makes more sense than the garbage the media feeds us.

In other words, if you are of the opinion that this entire push for "vaccination" is a hoax and a scam, then what alternative explanation do you subscribe to and how did you come to that conclusion? Should I reflexively call your opinion garbage w/o researching it?

I'm not looking to get into it with you this early in the morning (maybe later? LOL) but how can you dismiss the information in the article? It makes more sense than the garbage the media feeds us.

In other words, if you are of the opinion that this entire push for "vaccination" is a hoax and a scam, then what alternative explanation do you subscribe to and how did you come to that conclusion? Should I reflexively call your opinion garbage w/o researching it?

I'm of the opinion that anyone who doesn't want the vaccine should not get it or be coerced into getting it.

I'm of the opinion that people/government officials who want to mandate the vaccine should be brought up short. I'm of the opinion that the lockdowns and other BS we went through are a prime example of the cure being worse than the disease, for most people. Having said that, a lot of people died due to the virus and its effects are unpredictable from person to person so it's understandable that some people especially in high risk groups are concerned and would want to get whatever protection they could. But that doesn't warrant lockdowns or mandates for everyone.

I'm also of the opinion that the push for getting a lot of people vaccinated, which was initiated by President Trump and for which he took credit for getting it pushed through as fast as possible is not a vast worldwide conspiracy meant to kill as many people as possible.

That's a bunch of convoluted bullsh*t. There's a much simpler and more plausible explanation, and it was endorsed heartily by President Trump, who got the vaccine.

I'm of the opinion that anyone who doesn't want the vaccine should not get it or be coerced into getting it.

I'm of the opinion that people/government officials who want to mandate the vaccine should be brought up short. I'm of the opinion that the lockdowns and other BS we went through are a prime example of the cure being worse than the disease, for most people. Having said that, a lot of people died due to the virus and its effects are unpredictable from person to person so it's understandable that some people especially in high risk groups are concerned and would want to get whatever protection they could. But that doesn't warrant lockdowns or mandates for everyone.

I'm also of the opinion that the push for getting a lot of people vaccinated, which was initiated by President Trump and for which he took credit for getting it pushed through as fast as possible is not a vast worldwide conspiracy meant to kill as many people as possible.

That's a bunch of convoluted bullsh*t. There's a much simpler and more plausible explanation, and it was endorsed heartily by President Trump, who got the vaccine.

And endorsed by the forum "christian" racist.

It was the OP who failed to define "high Dose".



There are a whole cadre of nearly illiterate posters here who denigrate half the products in our food and drug supply as being poisons. Yet those same posters are here prescribing "high dose" rat poison as a curative for ailments invented from their vivid imaginations

I'm of the opinion that anyone who doesn't want the vaccine should not get it or be coerced into getting it.

I'm of the opinion that people/government officials who want to mandate the vaccine should be brought up short. I'm of the opinion that the lockdowns and other BS we went through are a prime example of the cure being worse than the disease, for most people. Having said that, a lot of people died due to the virus and its effects are unpredictable from person to person so it's understandable that some people especially in high risk groups are concerned and would want to get whatever protection they could. But that doesn't warrant lockdowns or mandates for everyone.

I'm also of the opinion that the push for getting a lot of people vaccinated, which was initiated by President Trump and for which he took credit for getting it pushed through as fast as possible is not a vast worldwide conspiracy meant to kill as many people as possible.

That's a bunch of convoluted bullsh*t. There's a much simpler and more plausible explanation, and it was endorsed heartily by President Trump, who got the vaccine.

It was the OP who failed to define "high Dose".

Yet those same posters are here prescribing "high dose" rat poison as a curative for ailments invented from their vivid imaginations

Holy Coat Hangers ~ Another nuthouse fûcktard showing his high level thinking.

Praise the Lord

🦫

There’s about a dozen here

Since no spoons or keys are magnetically sticking to my forehead, I deem them all discredited

BACK
How do we know graphene oxide isn't used in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines?

Health Desk

Published on
August 4, 2021

What our experts say

The Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not contain any graphene oxide. The ingredient list for both vaccines have been published and tested by outside parties. They were not found to contain any graphene oxide in their formulas, including their lipid nanoparticles.

Lipid nanoparticles, basically tiny balls of fat, are used in mRNA vaccines to protect delicate RNA molecules so the vaccine can enter the human body without being destroyed. Lipid nanoparticles have been recognized as potential drug delivery systems (ways to get medications into human cells, especially injectable drugs) since the 1960s. Lipids are fatty, oily, or waxy and include fats and oils (triglycerides), waxes, and steroids, among other things.

Sometimes a compound called polyethylene glycol (PEG) can be used to help keep lipid nanoparticles stable, as they are used in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. However, there is no graphene oxide in the PEG-lipid nanoparticles

No WHO authorized vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinovac, Sputnik V, or Janssen contain graphene oxide. The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine has not yet published a list of its ingredients in a peer-reviewed or open access publication.

Graphene oxide is a compound that contains carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen. It is used in many applications, from sensors to textiles to the potential application of medicine. This material is cheap, readily available, and can disperse in water. It is water soluble, so it may be a great solution for helping medications be absorbed. It can be produced as a powder or a solution for various uses.

Graphene oxide may be a useful tool in vaccine delivery in the future, because scientists and chemical engineers believe it can be engineered to be a safe delivery vehicle for vaccines, and help increase their effectiveness. Like lipid nanoparticles, graphene oxide is also a nanoparticle and has recently been used in an intranasal influenza vaccine platform with promising results.

Additionally, these nanoparticles have been shown to increase macrophages and T cells, which can boost our immune systems and generate potentially stronger immune responses. Recent studies have shown that graphene and graphene-related materials may have antiviral and antimicrobial properties, so evaluating them for use in medication and vaccine design is warranted.

While certain amounts of graphene oxide could be toxic to humans, current research on the use of this compound in other vaccines indicate that the amount that would be in potential vaccines would be so small that it would not be toxic to human cells. A 2016 study showed that graphene-base materials (like graphene oxide) might cause dose-dependent toxicity, decreased cell viability, formations of lung granuloma, and cell apoptosis. Notably, these studies were performed on mice, but graphene oxide specifically showed no obvious toxicity at low doses or middle doses from .1 to .25 mg. It was chronically toxic at higher doses of .4 mg, where it was found to deposit in the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. It is important to note that this .4 mg of graphene oxide is proportionally much greater in mice than it would be in humans, considering their size and biological differences. Further, this study was completed 10 years ago and the graphene oxide was not chemically engineered in a manner that may make it safer or more tolerable for living organisms.

Many more studies and trials are needed to determine whether or not graphene oxide is an effective, completely safe, and useful material for biomedical applications including drug delivery, imaging, and biosensors. Current research on the compound has produced mixed results but optimism have been increased due to the success of recent research projects as of late.
Context and background

Viral videos, posts, and articles have been falsely written about the role of graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines, despite any actual evidence to support these findings. The ingredients of COVID-19 vaccines have been published and evaluated by independent groups, outside of Novavax, and found no graphene oxide in any part of their formulas.

Graphene oxide is currently being investigated to determine whether or not it can be a safe and effective tool for use in vaccines among other biomedical properties.

Plastic spoons arent magnetic you dumbass. Head to Cracker Barrel for to try a real spoon.