Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Graphene Oxide

Actually its not.

Certainly not if you got the "clot shot" and would prefer not to know the name or true nature of the noxious substances that were injected into your body.

Typical retard. What's the problem, Tarqy? Couldn't make it passed the first 2 sentences?

Acute overdose requires between 15,000 µg/d (600,000 IU per day) and 42,000 µg/d (1,680,000 IU per day) over a period of several days to months.

Yet look how sugar, sacharine, sucralose, MSG, food colorings, BHA, Sodium Nitrite, MSG, etc, etc are maligned on this board while they are far less poisonous than is Cholecalciferol.

As stated before. The only difference between food and poison is dosage.

Sure. It doesn't have to be so fugging sensational however.


We need not scream at afib patients who are taking Warfarin for consuming rat poison.

I have not pulled a d-dimer yet.


But I dismantled a ship that was built on after effect lymphocytes


Before and after data. Negligible change.
No wild eyed conspiracy on that one

So I gotta ask

When does the magnetism start??

Is it not amazing that thinking folks refuse to acknowledge that clotting issues are a MAJOR result of Covid infection. My wife got daily heparin injections while she was hospitalized with Covid.

But egads, the Vax might cause clotting.

Have our schools totally forgone the teaching of Logic?

Sometimes a bit of sensationalism is required to compete with sensationalism..

Look at all the sensationalism in the first few posts in this thread.

I don't look at any of that shìt.

Maybe you have already reached your Currie Temp?

I have certainly heard from the medical community and recovered patients that clotting was an issue with covid

I’ve heard from Alex Jones, Dr Mercola, “Dr” Robert Young and fluoride freaks that the vax was the clot inducer.
Dr Young has been posted on here a few times by some high roller cut n paste jockeys.
Dr Young doesnt have any type of medical degree and spent 8 months in jail.

That’s be one hell of an Unfever ?

That is total bullshit.

This whole thing is tiresome.

Probably the biggest lasting result of all this will be the clear division in the population into two opposing groups. Each with it's own militant adherents. Don't misunderstand me, I believe there is a right and wrong side, and not everyone is equally valid in their viewpoint.

It's just tiresome to continually hash it out.

Nailed it. None of us know the real facts yet and most of us probably ever will because the government and paid off big pharma people will keep the truth hidden. That IS a fact and has been known for years. They can tell us whatever the hell they want as far as what's in the vaccine because they simply can and there's plenty of people stupid enough to believe them.

$60 billion dollar vax and still growing.

They really care about our health. Get your booster shot.

Why are ER and other hospital nurses walking out because they don't want the vax? Wouldn't they WANT to get it working in a hospital of all places?

My guess is it's probably because they see the effects the vax is having on patients and they sure as hell don't like it?

Jag...How about an update about that Jefferson guy you are so hot on...You know the one that did all that fornicating with his slaves...Was he one of Satans Minions also?

And Tom being an enlightened intellectual....what are the odds he would be all in on 5G. Hell he taught those Lewis and Clark boys to use that instrument of the devil...You know the sextant....

According to the article that Jag says thanks for posting, the 5G network is part of the plan to wipe us out....Yet Jag is posting on at least 3G and it will be eliminated soon..Does that mean he will no longer post?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/30/3g-networks-ending/

For consideration:



The Pfizer vaccine isn’t 99% graphene oxide

14 JULY 2021
WHAT WAS CLAIMED

The Pfizer vaccine is 99% graphene oxide.
OUR VERDICT

False. The MHRA has told Full Fact that this is ‘completely incorrect’.
There have been multiple claims made online which say that the Pfizer vaccine contains 99% graphene oxide, a substance which is derived from graphite. The claims originate from a Spanish study and have been circulating in English (across the UK and the US), in Spanish and in Portugese. They are not true.

Some of the claims highlight concerns about the toxicity of graphene oxide, while others suggest that graphene oxide may provide an explanation for the ‘magnetism’ that has been commonly claimed to be associated with the Covid-19 vaccines (this is false and we have fact checked this claim previously).

In addition to seeing posts shared on social media, Full Fact has also been asked about these claims by our own readers. Several users on social media have claimed graphene oxide in the vaccine is being used to poison people and create a mass genocide. This is not true, and there is no graphene oxide in the Pfizer vaccine.

Graphene oxide is a nanomaterial (a chemical substance or material that is at a very small scale, for example with an external dimension of 1-100nm) which is thought to be of important potential use for biomedicine. There are concerns, however, around toxicity and potential adverse effects.

There are modifications which are being explored, and Johns Hopkins infectious disease specialist Dr. Amesh Adalja previously told AP News that there has been research on potentially using graphene oxide in other vaccines, but the amounts would not be toxic to human cells.

The concern around the presence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer vaccine seem to be based on a Spanish study which says that on transmission electron microscopy (a microscopy technique which allows particularly fine details and structures to be seen), the solution created from a vial of the Pfizer vaccine takes a very similar form to graphene oxide.

Graphene oxide is not listed as an ingredient of the vaccine, and the Medical and Health product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) told Full Fact that these claims are “completely incorrect”.

A spokesperson for Pfizer also told Full Fact that “Graphene oxide is not used in the manufacture of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine”.

With regards to the Spanish study, there are a number of problems with the claims that it makes, and the way that these findings have been interpreted by some people on social media.

The claim that the Pfizer vaccine is largely made up of graphene oxide has been fact checked many times before.



Only one sample was tested and its provenance is unknown
Firstly, we have no way of verifying what the scientists actually looked at through electron microscopy. The paper says that the sample of Pfizer vaccine for testing was received by the testing laboratory from a courier and, although the sample was sealed, its provenance and traceability is unknown. The author says in the study limitations that these findings are from “one single sample” of Pfizer vaccine and therefore, “significant sampling of similar vials” is required in order to “draw conclusions that can be generalized”.



The study itself says it is not ‘conclusive evidence’
When referring to the images which compare electron microscopy of the Pfizer vaccine with images of microscopy of graphene oxide, the study says that they “represent a high similarity” but also says that this does not provide “definitive identification” or “conclusive evidence”.

Importantly, the document says that it is an interim report. It has not been published in a reputable scientific journal, or received peer review.


The University of Almeria has distanced itself
Thirdly, while the researcher who authors the paper reportedly works at the University of Almeria in Spain—a claim that has been used to add legitimacy when circulated online—the author clearly states that the results and conclusions of the report “do not imply any institutional position of the University of Almeria”.

The university has also publicly distanced itself from the paper on Twitter and in a released statement, saying that it is an “unofficial report by a university professor about an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with total lack of traceability”.

The university said it does not subscribe to this report.

https://fullfact.org/online/graphene-oxide/

Emphasis mine.

Read between the lines. Could it be any more obvious?

My guess is, they've already had covid and aren't worried about catching it again.

As long as we're guessing, I just thought I'd throw that out there.