Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Kyle~ Guilty Or Not Guilty?

Stupidity runs amuck in you.

You never disappoint in showing how much of a truely stupid Fugg you are.

Sad thing is, there are prolly one or more members on that jury just like him.

You couldn’t be a bigger khu nt is you tried. Other than your emotions, what evidence supports your lie?

That and about a gallon of Barry’s load

I’d say normally she’s not serious. Just another provocateur getting her jollies. But in this case I really believe it’s a sincerely held position

I think the kid walks. And I hope he bankrupts the city with a lawsuit.

You are more than likely correct.

Jurors almost always will opt for the free lunch

You must be a carpenter. You nailed that chit. Those prosecutors should be flogged

I read that protesters are 'demanding' that he be convicted. That's a trial? There's no law in America that can condone that.

He’s also mentioned fmj ammo is more dangerous

There’s no left handed guns

If you point a gun at someone you forfeit your right to self defense

If you bring a gun somewhere you forfeit your right to self defense

The dead/wounded aren’t black and they aren’t paying for unrest with a Dem in office. They won’t burn sh*t if he is found not guilty.

I was disappointed in the defense lawyers closing argument. Wish he’d measured the four feet from the jury box, looked them all in the eye so he knew how close it was, turned his back & then spun around lunged towards the jury & slapped the railing. That’s how long Kyle had to determine if this raving lunatic fresh outa jail was going to take his rifle & shoot Kyle & others. That’s real time folks, place yourself in Kyles shoes, what would you have done in 3/4 of a second ?

Boom Boom ?!







Out go the lights

I thought the defense closing argument was one of the poorer performances I have seen a defense lawyer give. And make no doubt about it, effective closings are a performance.

One thing that jumped out at me was the over reliance on videos. A good lawyers stock in trade is his words. I thought by over using PowerPoint and video that the defense never got into a cadence or rhythm when doing his closing. Also if you are going to use electronic props, make sure you are practiced in them so you aren't fumbling with them like he did.

Wish the defense could have gotten the judge to reconsider not allowing Rosenbaughs past criminal record. I think the fact that he had served 10 years in prison for child rape likely meant that he had been in dozens of fights, and defense could have brought in a record of his prison infractions to prove this. A 36 year old veteran of dozens of jailhouse fights has a distinct advantage against a 17 year old. I think that when Binger brought up a "bar fight" scenario he opened the door for this.

Dumbass's can't think of something like this .


I had a lowyer in a lawsuit who was a moron who sat there like he was asleep

I’m reading some of you are not only disappointed in the Defense closing arguments, but also in the jury instruction by the judge, does this mean you are losing confidence in acquittal or a hung jury?

Juries are unpredictable. One member can latch onto the oddest little aspect of a complex case, and sway the other members to fixate on it.

I still think him being acquitted is the most likely outcome.

Binger all but insulted the intelligence of the jury in some of his statements in closing, and came across as completely unlikable. I think they will see he has no credibility. I thought the Rolly-Polly DA that did the rebuttal did a better job.

But a stronger showing by the defense in closing would have made things surer.

Checklist Charlie? I guess it just depends on whether you are a Laurel fan or a Hardy fan.

I would have hoped the jury returned a verdict by now, mostly likely meaning they were all in favor of an acquittal