Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Kyle~ Guilty Or Not Guilty?

Lets just hope there are several on the jury that feel the same way. If not, Kyle gets the shaft and a terrible precedent will be set.

Correct me, but didn't all those who entered Rittenhouse's space have criminal rap sheets? And the first one was just out of the hospital after he'd attempted SUICIDE?

I bet this evidence was never given to the jury.

It was not allowed to be entered.


MM

Not guilty and the jury should agree. That being said, not sure about the merit of a 17YO walking around armed in a powder keg of a situation.

The adults didn't seem to have the balls to do the right thing.... including the ones paid to do the right thing.
So by your standard a 17 yr old doesn't have the right to defend himself?
WTF is wrong with you?

If the FBI was an honorable organization and turned over the video, and the local Prosecutor had any morals, these charges would have never been brought. If he doesn't get a not guilty verdict, nobody will be safe to defend themselves, especially if the violent rioting mob is a Leftist mob.

Half the country probably feels like he didn't have the right to self defense which is the sad part...They probably feel like the prosecuting attorney in that he should have just duked it out with the adult convicts that were threatening him, and somehow that would be better because the only person that might have been killed was the kid that was there to provide first aid and put out fires...He should have let the convicts take his weapon too in their eyes..

Exactly right.

His merit was exactly right. Where he got it wrong was thinking that grown men would be there with the same courage and love of country that he had. The kid literally was scrubbing graffiti off walls and wanted to go into law enforcement for all of the right reasons. The same reasons the left is doing all they can to make sure that kids like him won’t or can’t.

No kidding.

Now they're finding better quality video from the drone than what was submitted by the prosecution. And the jump kicker has just now been mysteriously identified, when the prosecution knew who he was all along. IMHO, the big lady at the defense should get a free shot at slapping the wimp judge's face around to the other side of his head. What a Schifftshow.

Similar to the judge in the OJ case. Guys that go into that line of work have limited real life experience. They mostly went straight out of HS being spoon fed to a BA degree and then straight to law school. They graduate at 25 with virtually no work experience or any meaningful hard work or life experiences and start angling for careers as politicians or judges thinking that they know best.

Not guilty.

Sues the crap out of Biden and fake media who slandered him.

Wins huge award. Buy his Mom haircuts for the rest of her life.

No, hopefully

I hope so but this is The USA 2021 and we’ve fallen so far that only a 2nd Revolution will cleanse us and refresh The Tree of Liberty.

There is no way that a war is NOT COMING... no longer possible that it can be avoided.

America has become a nation of 'IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES"... a divorce is the ONLY OPTION.

United we fall, divided we stand a chance... it really is that simple.

The pain is going to be extreme for those that are not ready... and severe for those that are.

He should be able to walk anywhere without being attacked. Rittenhouse was completely within his rights. Americans have become used to cops doing their dirty work. In this case, the cops were prevented from doing their job. Had they DONE their job, there wouldn't have been a riot. In any case, all citizens can enforce the law.

not that I'm going to shed a tear over a pedophile taking a bullet, but it doesn't really matter if Rosenbaum was a pervert or a choir boy

Rittenhouse had a right to be in Kenosha as much as any other person did that night and the weapon wasn't illegal.

all that matters is that Rosenbaum attacked Rittenhouse without any provocation

Time was, in my country and, I believe, your country, that people were expected to turn out, armed if need be, to deal with disturbances of the peace and good order. Indeed that is why I quoted Robert Peel, earlier, because it was a principle from the common roots we have that the people would turn out, taking responsibility for protecting their community.

FWIW about a century ago relatives of mine, and many others besides, turned out with their guns to hunt down a gang of outlaws running wild in the region, robbing and murdering people. One of them was wounded by local citizens in an exchange of fire, and a few days later after being wounded again was captured by another group of local citizens not far from where my family has held land for the last 170 years. Another turned himself in, and the third was shot dead by another bloke, a farmer. These blokes who dealt with the bandits were hailed for it. Nowadays they'd probably be charged.

It seems to me, from this distance, that the young bloke turned out the way that people were, at one time, expected to do, and that there's a segment of the population which can't abide that he did so. That sort of self reliance, rather than dependence on the State for protection, seems anathema to them.

This.....Eveything else is bullshit.

He's f ucked...