Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Texas home shoot video

I think if he had a violent past it would be in that article, or at least one article. If it was very violent he might not have had visitation at all. Most dads get screwed on visitation, you should know that.

But to answer your other question, I wouldn’t be with a skank that screwed her kids daddy out of his time with his boys. Little man is a double jay jay for condoning it.

Well if he/she is bigger than you and pushing you around maybe you should cowboy up and tell him to leave. Or take the @sswhipping. You choose.

Legally speaking Its always smart to initiate physical confrontation and immediately escalate the situation to physical violence and eventually deadly force when you could have just simply walked away.

The circumstances of the Skank thing are not clear. Still I am not letting anyone push me around on my own porch. As for the violent past thing being in the article typically the deceased gets a bit of leeway since he is deceased. Could be the newspaper feels like you do, that no one has the right to say who is on their property.

I don't read anything written by the Washington Post.

It’s the New York post.

Why would the "boyfriend" have to walk away, he was on his own property. Why couldn't the ex walk away? Did he have to commit suicide?

His son was not there. He should left and picked him up at his ex's mother's house, where the son was at.

Watched the video but have not read the over 200 posts. A man on his own property has a right to arm himself at any time and in this case a hostile visitor was present and refusing to leave. When a struggle over a single firearm or knife happens both parties are considered armed. I was taught to retain possession of my weapon at all costs. The same right to defend a weapon goes with a private citizen as well as law enforcement. Did the homeowner/boyfriend have the right to arm himself? I would say yes. Did the visitor have the right to be there? I would say no. Were they both armed? I would say yes in that the visitor was angry and appeared stronger and actively tried to take possession of the weapon.

I sure hope that pu**y is really good because it sure has caused a lot of trouble.

The most remarkable thing to me about this video, is how clearly it illustrates that you can be here one minute and gone the next. What ever happens going forward, the big guy is dead forever.

Yep. Lots of mistakes by both.

Dumbass # 1 should have stayed in the house. And shouldn’t have bought out his gun. And never should have fired a warning shot. That’s not legal. And bringing a gun into an argument was more stupidity. He should have called the cops.

Dumbass # 2 should have left when told to leave. And never should have tried to take the gun. And should’ve called the Cops.

Results: Dumbass # 1 will be charged with some degree of Homicide after the Grand Jury convenes.

Dumbass # 2 is Dead. He should have walked away and called the Cops.

You can’t shoot someone for Trespass in TX. Or being an asswhole. Both dumbasses lost here. One lost his life. The other is about to lose his freedom.

Little guy won the battle but will he win the war and will it be worth the cost?

He hooked up with a woman who had baggage. He knew it . He knew to mind his own business. If he didnt think ex's would argue over their kids he is an idiot.

She'll leave him when he is in prison and broke from the legal fees.

Two men's lives ruined and the woman will walk away Scott free with no responsibility.

I think there is a lesson here to be learned.

He wasn't shot for trespass or being an asswhole. He was shot because the other man was afraid of him. Probably thought the man was going to take away that loaded firearm. He might have done well to go inside and let those two argue it out. You can get into a lot of crap trying to take up for a woman when she ain't worth it.

Pretty easy to see how this will go.
Despite Rambo Prosecuters and Defense lawyers here.

The prosecuted will likely ask the grand jury to indict.
They will.
And it's anybody's GUESS, how a jury will interpret the
dumphuckery both guys displayed.

It's not what I would have done, but I'm going to say that the dead guy not leaving when told to leave and becoming physical might be enough to keep the not smart guy out of prison.

There could be a LOT more to the story than what we see in a short video clip that could easily change my opinion.

But did he feel the ex had a right to push him around on his own porch? He was actually minding his own business and property. He told the guy to leave and he did not. Would you go hide? How do you know the ex wouldn't go into the house?

Texas law is pretty clear on these issues and dad clearly advanced on the little guy.

Dad also verbalized that he would take the weapon from little guy and fugk him with it. Which would easily be interpreted as a threat of deadly force by most people.

Dad made two overt motions to grab the weapon. He was shot the second time.

Even if arrested and charged, Texas jury isn’t going to convict based on that video.