Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Call me crazy......but I think I may be on to something

Let's take a peek at some history that affects most of us. In the 80s and 90s the US was pressing hard for natural gas to be in every home possible. There were incentives, rebates, commercials galore. Gasoline had pretty high demand and big oil was pretty much the big fish in the sea.

As the information age progressed the push to eliminate dams came into the picture. Return the rivers to the fish was the play. We know good and well that rivers like the mighty Columbia need dams for irrigation and transportation.....let alone power and flood control....but regardless, the narrative was pressed hard.

Enter the 2000's. Gas is everywhere in surplus and easy to recover. Pipeline wars need to exist to stop the easy power of gas. In this time period coal and gas fired generators come under scrutiny....dirty power. Bad. Bad. Bad.

Electric cars are now increasing in popularity as is brown outs in large cities. Electric load is at a new peak. Dams are still bad. Even grand coulee with it's 850megawatt each units. Bad.

Wind and solar farms pop up everywhere. They can make a few megs when all is well. Not quite like the hydroelectric but when they work, they work. Ish.

Now in the 2020's gas is bad and large cities and California want to do away with it. In fact, we hate it so much, we need to regulate cow farts. Methane is terrible. We must shift to Electric power.

Hold this thought while I backfill a little.

USSR destabilization creates the country of Ukraine. We all hear about the "Russian collusion" of the former US president. Why Russia? Perhaps because they are/were a known powerful nation.....

Or, because they have the greatest potential to reabsorb the Ukraine if it fails.

What do you know, Ukraine is failing.

Who have we heard about working with the Ukrainian? That's right, our democrat leaders! Who's family has ties? All of them.

What does Ukraine have that American investors want?

Uranium.

So we have created the need for excess power in the US and destroyed Ukraine. What's the common denominator?

Nuclear power. We are looking at the biggest run on nuclear power plants in the very near future. We have created the need. We are securing the fuel and regulating American voters into no other choice.

So when we look at contested elections and this scenario, it becomes very easy to establish motive and potential.

Talk me out of it.

Ha! First you’d have to talk me into reading all that😱

Find out what stock Pelosi and Hunter Bidens buddies are investing in and you’ll have your answer….

You forget that the left owns the democrats right now and lefties hate nuclear power. Not happening while The Squad and their ilk are around.

It's not that complicated. The "powers that be" want Russia and the U.S.A. to destroy each other.

lefties hate nuclear power. Not happening while The Squad and their ilk are around.

Smoke and mirrors

Common sense, basic math and Economics 1 have been outlawed by D.C. politicos.

https://www.unz.com/proberts/if-bli...sion-of-ukraine-why-is-he-provoking-one/

excerpt:

Now in our present time, we are watching liars set up World War III with false reports about Russia. World War III is likely to be a terminal war for humanity. For the demise of the human race and life on the planet we can thank liars.

Consider the irresponsible US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He is in the news warning US embassy staff in Kiev, Ukraine, that Russian troops and tanks could be pouring over the Ukraine border at any moment. The asseertion that Russia is going to invade Ukraine has been a mainstay of US propaganda for some time.

If Blinken really believes this, why did the US not forestall the expected invasion by giving Russia the security protection she needs by agreeing to no further expansion of NATO? Why, instead, did Blinken keep the prospect of Ukraine’s membership in NATO open and send more arms and more US military personal to train Ukrainian troops in the use of the American weapons? Blinken understands very well that no amount of weapons in Ukrainian hands could stop a Russian invasion.

It seems that Blinken wants conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Why? Several reasons become apparent once the question is asked. It makes the Russian Threat real and solidifies Washington’s hold on Europe. It calls forth more budget and power for the US military/security complex, and it improves Biden’s faltering chances in the elections.

Now, who would want that?

Maybe as a first step, Bristle, but the objective of Gates, Schwab, Rockefellers and Rothschilds is massive population reduction. Agenda 2030.

Yep. False Flag deep state precipitated event.

What does Q say?