|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680 |
Objectively, what are the major differences, if any, in materials or production quality? (Interested in the comparison to pre64 because it seems more apples to apples with CRF.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928 |
I've owned both. Multiple examples of both and I still can't think of how to answer this
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,125 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,125 Likes: 2 |
This is just speculation, based on an example of one. But a while back I cut a new crown and oversized the scope base holes for a guy on the receiver of a 640. Judging from the swarf, the difficulty of the drilling and tapping operation...I got the definite impression that the 640 is made with something notably tougher than the 4140 of the Winchesters, and I have worked on a lot of them over the years. I am used to using sulfur and lard oil on my HSS tools, nope, went to cobalt and Rapid Tap after the first bite. The swarf from the cut-off and crown was like a coil spring steel, a continuous chip. Unscientific, but gut feeling is the 640 uses steel tougher than I am used to.
Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188 |
The biggest difference is the ejector, which is pretty important. Its a separate piece on the Pre-64 that performs its duty specifically. On the Husky its held in place by this kinda goofy flat spring affair, not as positive IMO. If I remember correctly, it also serves as the bolt stop on the Husky.
The trigger is easier to tune on a Pre-64 as well. The Husky military style trigger is robust, but much harder to tune to a good weight w/o creep. Most, if not all aftermarket triggers for the Husky require stock modifications.
I also prefer the safety on the bolt shroud of the Pre-64, but the Husky can be fitted for a side swing safety.
The Husky is much trimmer and a good bit lighter. I like the earlier 50's models with steel bottom metal.
Stuck in airports, Terrorized Sent to meetings, Hypnotized Over-exposed, Commercialized Handle me with Care... -Traveling Wilbury's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,665
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,665 |
I have both and while I really like the 1640s, I prefer the trigger/safety and bolt stop/release on M70s. This is probably design differences more than materials but I think Husqvarna could have done better on that bolt release tab.
Last edited by LEADMINER; 01/20/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188 |
This is just speculation, based on an example of one. But a while back I cut a new crown and oversized the scope base holes for a guy on the receiver of a 640. Judging from the swarf, the difficulty of the drilling and tapping operation...I got the definite impression that the 640 is made with something notably tougher than the 4140 of the Winchesters, and I have worked on a lot of them over the years. I am used to using sulfur and lard oil on my HSS tools, nope, went to cobalt and Rapid Tap after the first bite. The swarf from the cut-off and crown was like a coil spring steel, a continuous chip. Unscientific, but gut feeling is the 640 uses steel tougher than I am used to. I'm no metallurgist, but I agree completely with this based on owning several, one which required chamber work.
Stuck in airports, Terrorized Sent to meetings, Hypnotized Over-exposed, Commercialized Handle me with Care... -Traveling Wilbury's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928 |
This is just speculation, based on an example of one. But a while back I cut a new crown and oversized the scope base holes for a guy on the receiver of a 640. Judging from the swarf, the difficulty of the drilling and tapping operation...I got the definite impression that the 640 is made with something notably tougher than the 4140 of the Winchesters, and I have worked on a lot of them over the years. I am used to using sulfur and lard oil on my HSS tools, nope, went to cobalt and Rapid Tap after the first bite. The swarf from the cut-off and crown was like a coil spring steel, a continuous chip. Unscientific, but gut feeling is the 640 uses steel tougher than I am used to. That's what JES says too. Husky barrels are significantly harder steel than Winchester
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680 |
I've owned both. Multiple examples of both and I still can't think of how to answer this Mike - I guess what I'm grappling with has a lot to do with the demand for pre-64s. I realize a lot of that has to do with nostalgia and Made in America, etc. But they're also frequently touted as being some of the best mass-produced bolt action rifles ever made (not fair to compare an assembly line gun with a bespoke safari rifle.) The Husqvarnas overlap the M70s quite a bit, both used a CRF action, and both strike me as having been "nice, solid" rifles for everyday hunters, but not seen as gaudy or fancy in their day. So I'm wondering if the HVA can go toe to toe with the M70s on everything aside from mystique. (Does that make any sense?)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928 |
I've owned both. Multiple examples of both and I still can't think of how to answer this Mike - I guess what I'm grappling with has a lot to do with the demand for pre-64s. I realize a lot of that has to do with nostalgia and Made in America, etc. But they're also frequently touted as being some of the best mass-produced bolt action rifles ever made (not fair to compare an assembly line gun with a bespoke safari rifle.) The Husqvarnas overlap the M70s quite a bit, both used a CRF action, and both strike me as having been "nice, solid" rifles for everyday hunters, but not seen as gaudy or fancy in their day. So I'm wondering if the HVA can go toe to toe with the M70s on everything aside from mystique. (Does that make any sense?) I believe so. The only flaw I remember on Husqvarna rifles were their tendency for the tang wood to split
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680 |
Does the better steel carry forward to the 1640s?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,188 |
I've owned both. Multiple examples of both and I still can't think of how to answer this Mike - I guess what I'm grappling with has a lot to do with the demand for pre-64s. I realize a lot of that has to do with nostalgia and Made in America, etc. But they're also frequently touted as being some of the best mass-produced bolt action rifles ever made (not fair to compare an assembly line gun with a bespoke safari rifle.) The Husqvarnas overlap the M70s quite a bit, both used a CRF action, and both strike me as having been "nice, solid" rifles for everyday hunters, but not seen as gaudy or fancy in their day. So I'm wondering if the HVA can go toe to toe with the M70s on everything aside from mystique. (Does that make any sense?) I believe so. The only flaw I remember on Husqvarna rifles were their tendency for the tang wood to split Yes, a little relief on the stock where the tang sits helps. As does glass in the lug area. Some came with beech stocks as opposed to walnut.
Stuck in airports, Terrorized Sent to meetings, Hypnotized Over-exposed, Commercialized Handle me with Care... -Traveling Wilbury's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 631 |
I just picked up a 1640 in 3006. I was debating on whether I should bed the recoil lug and maybe the tang but its uncracked and survived this long maybe I should see how it shoots first? The stock is in pretty nice shape and has the later alloy bottom metal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701 |
I just picked up a 1640 in 3006. I was debating on whether I should bed the recoil lug and maybe the tang but its uncracked and survived this long maybe I should see how it shoots first? The stock is in pretty nice shape and has the later alloy bottom metal. I wouldn't fuc k around, bed it now and shoot it for a lifetime. I still have at least three 1640/640 take off stocks on my bench and all are cracked at the tang/wrist due to setback at the recoil lug. Course, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: ‘Do I feel lucky?’, Well do ya?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701 |
Personally, I prefer the 640 and 1640 over the Model 70 but the Husqvarna's weakness is the inletting and the Model 70's weakness is the gas handling. My favorite Model 70 is a 6.5x55 Classic.
Me, I enjoy both, but judge each axample on it's condition. I have a few dozen Husqvarnas and 3 model 70's.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928 |
Does the better steel carry forward to the 1640s? Yes
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,359
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,359 |
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,088 Likes: 6
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,088 Likes: 6 |
This is just speculation, based on an example of one. But a while back I cut a new crown and oversized the scope base holes for a guy on the receiver of a 640. Judging from the swarf, the difficulty of the drilling and tapping operation...I got the definite impression that the 640 is made with something notably tougher than the 4140 of the Winchesters, and I have worked on a lot of them over the years. I am used to using sulfur and lard oil on my HSS tools, nope, went to cobalt and Rapid Tap after the first bite. The swarf from the cut-off and crown was like a coil spring steel, a continuous chip. Unscientific, but gut feeling is the 640 uses steel tougher than I am used to. That or their heat treating process was different or inconsistent. Neither great, as that actually causes embrittlement. This was common in some early manufactured 1903 springfields and some eddystone manufactured m1917's. I always thought I'd like the 640, until I handled them and really looked them over. They seem to be great rifles that are comparable to the pre 64, but less refined like most mauser 98 derivatives. Basically an FN 98, which is a great platform for a build. The 640's I've handled were smooth, but a little clunky compared to the pre 64 model 70. Generally the 640 can be found for a great deal, if you can find one. They seem to be getting harder and harder to find. I wish I would have purchased the ones I have seen in the used rifle racks over the years. The most recent one I handled was only $400.00. A bargain, as compared to most pre 64 model 70's I've seen...
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,809 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,809 Likes: 3 |
I've owned both. Multiple examples of both and I still can't think of how to answer this Mike - I guess what I'm grappling with has a lot to do with the demand for pre-64s. I realize a lot of that has to do with nostalgia and Made in America, etc. But they're also frequently touted as being some of the best mass-produced bolt action rifles ever made (not fair to compare an assembly line gun with a bespoke safari rifle.) The Husqvarnas overlap the M70s quite a bit, both used a CRF action, and both strike me as having been "nice, solid" rifles for everyday hunters, but not seen as gaudy or fancy in their day. So I'm wondering if the HVA can go toe to toe with the M70s on everything aside from mystique. (Does that make any sense?) I believe so. The only flaw I remember on Husqvarna rifles were their tendency for the tang wood to split It’s always puzzled me how they could make such excellent rifles, but not figure out how to prevent that. I have a Heym in .308 that split badly, but that stock is the lightest walnut Mauser stock I’ve ever seen, and is very trim to boot. I put two crossbolts through that one and am hoping for the best.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928 |
|
|
|
|
592 members (10gaugemag, 10Glocks, 1badf350, 1lesfox, 1936M71, 12344mag, 61 invisible),
2,522
guests, and
1,431
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,195
Posts18,485,034
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|