|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,257 Likes: 27
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,257 Likes: 27 |
I was talking about the loaded rounds. That's what I always talk about too. Its the finished product that is important. As far as brass you use. Lapua is excellent right out of the box. If you don't know how to properly prep your brass, then it is a good idea to buy Lapua. After all is said and done any good brass will produce great accuracy/precision if you prep it right. There's always a lot of talk about how accurate guys' rifles and loads are, but with no proof. Its always, you have to use this or that and I get sub 1/2 moa out of my rifle and load. Its all talk unless you can prove it otherwise. Also guys that don't check run-out have their heads buried in the sand and are driving blind. That chidt is going to sneak up behind them and bite them in the AZZ...
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,466 Likes: 5
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,466 Likes: 5 |
OK... so what's the best tool (s) for checking runout (both case & loaded)?... Been look'in at that sexy new redding slant gauge...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,948 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,948 Likes: 3 |
Recently my son bought a couple of boxes of Federal Premium 270 Winchester ammo loaded with 150 grain Nosler Partitions, a combo that normally groups well inside of 3/4" at 100 yards. This stuff, though, had trouble staying inside of 2" at that distance. We thought something might be wrong with the scope so tried a group with ammo from an older lot which put 3 shots into a 1/2". So it's likely something to do with this newer lot. When we got home I checked for bullet run out and was shocked to see it was running from 0.01 to 0.012" ( 10-12 thou!). The older lot showed run out from 0.002 - 0.003".
Federal Premium used to be very good. Anyone else experienced recent quality issues with Federal Premium ammo?
I don't shoot commercial ammo much. When I do I measure concentricity of every cartridge. Some are fine, up to 0.003". Others not so much. Many years ago like Mathman, I measured and sorted cartridges to shoot groups. I did this because prior to then I never paid any attention to concentricity figuring that any shot outside of groups I was shooting I must have pulled off at trigger break. Cartridges with little runout grouped well, more runout groups opened up. Sort a group of cartridges where 3 had little runout, add 2 that had 0.010" runout, there were the fliers.
GOA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,415 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,415 Likes: 6 |
There is a mathematical relationship between bullet tilt and group size.... up to the point where the chamber bends it straighter. This relationship depends on random rotational orientation of the bent bullet. As I explained on this forum 4 years ago. https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/12563531/re-collet-dies#Post12563531
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. -Ernest Hemingway The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything.-- Edward John Phelps
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1 |
I keep runout to 0.003 or less, it's not hard to keep it less than 0.003. I'd say most of mine are 0.002 or less. I also turn the necks as well to keep everything nice and aligned. It's is a PITA but since I started keeping case necks the same thickness and keep runout to a minimum, accuracy improved.
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,750
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,750 |
I keep runout to 0.003 or less, it's not hard to keep it less than 0.003. I'd say most of mine are 0.002 or less. I also turn the necks as well to keep everything nice and aligned. It's is a PITA but since I started keeping case necks the same thickness and keep runout to a minimum, accuracy improved. Honest question...at what yardage does a difference of 0.002" make in accuracy or group size? Take for example 500 yards. Same case lot for powder - primer - bullet - and brass. Same rifle - shot same day - same conditions. Shooter has sorted his ammo. He has 10 rounds at 0.002" runout - and 10 rounds at 0.004" runout. How much of a difference will that .002" make at 500 yards?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,755
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,755 |
I too would like to know what tools are used to measure AND correct runout. I want to start doing this....
Welcome to TN - patron state of shootin’ stuff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763 |
I don't think there is a magical number. Many BR and F-Class champions state they do not measure runout. Not measuring runout is no indication that it doesn't matter. Measuring is no indication that it DOES matter. Measuring ammo won't affect accuracy. First, you need to load it correctly. There is a reason the the big dogs quit measuring; it is because it DIDN'T matter within reason and was thus a waste of time. Hell, before I ever knew I was supposed to measure it, I was shooting cleans. Unless your process is terrible, your components are junk, or your equipment is junk, it is hard for it to matter in the grand scheme of things. Even a novice hand loader won't load ammo >0.005". I shot some factory Hornady into .25 MOA with 0.008" runout recently. I only measured it out of curiosity. Unless it is TERRIBLY bad, it really doesn't matter. I used to check match ammo, but I also dropped the habit and saw no difference in scores. I haven't shot matches in a few years, but still shoot/teach long range shooting and use GOOD ammo when demonstrating in class. What matters more is keeping a rifle in tune. Measuring for runout should be reserved for setting up equipment or when making changes to process or used as a diagnostic tool. Measuring each and every round is time consuming and the effort won't show up on target.
Last edited by tylerw02; 02/12/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763 |
I too would like to know what tools are used to measure AND correct runout. I want to start doing this.... Correcting runout involves changes in process or equipment. The idea you can use a tool to correct loaded rounds is nothing more than a gimmick. To measure it, purchase a concentricity gauge and dial indicator. Some will measure a fired case to determine if their chamber is true. Then some will measure the neck after sizing...but do not fall into this trap as imperfections in the neck are pushed OUTWARD from the expander mandrel or expander ball. Personally, I prefer an expander mandrel or gauge pin to an expander ball. Sizing of the case and expanding the necks should be done in separate steps. The true test of processes is to determine bullet runout. There is a debate as to where this should be measured; ogive, near the tip, or between the tip and ogive. Believe it or not, many times the runout found here can actually be bad bullets. Many claim they are getting 0.001" runout and maybe they are...but anything reasonable is OK. If you have a problem, the tool can help you identify which step is inducing it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,941 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,941 Likes: 2 |
Could not agree more. Its all talk unless you can prove it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621 |
I too would like to know what tools are used to measure AND correct runout. I want to start doing this.... Correcting runout involves changes in process or equipment. The idea you can use a tool to correct loaded rounds is nothing more than a gimmick. To measure it, purchase a concentricity gauge and dial indicator. Some will measure a fired case to determine if their chamber is true. Then some will measure the neck after sizing...but do not fall into this trap as imperfections in the neck are pushed OUTWARD from the expander mandrel or expander ball. Personally, I prefer an expander mandrel or gauge pin to an expander ball. Sizing of the case and expanding the necks should be done in separate steps. The true test of processes is to determine bullet runout. There is a debate as to where this should be measured; ogive, near the tip, or between the tip and ogive. Believe it or not, many times the runout found here can actually be bad bullets. Many claim they are getting 0.001" runout and maybe they are...but anything reasonable is OK. If you have a problem, the tool can help you identify which step is inducing it. I’ve got to say your posts are what I was hoping for - many benefit from different positions taken from life experiences especially when the details are being parsed in a respectful way. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,568 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,568 Likes: 1 |
Could not agree more. Its all talk unless you can prove it Yes but imo knowing your ammo is straight is one hell of a mental booster.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26 |
[/quote] Yes but imo knowing your ammo is straight is one hell of a mental booster.[/quote]
Yes, and it eliminates one factor that often affects accuracy.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26 |
I might also mention that EVERY factor (including measurement) that's been discussed here is included in my GUN GACK books. They're definitely not The Revelation, because everything was learned from reading and talking with other handloaders, plus experience. And I continue to learn something just about every week or month.
But one thing I've noted before about the Campfire (and other Internet sites) is most people want some simple answer for free--especially relative newbies, many of whom have never even bothered to purchase a current loading manual, or if they have, never read anything except the data for the cartridge(s) they plan to reload.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,893 Likes: 12 |
Measuring for runout should be reserved for setting up equipment or when making changes to process or used as a diagnostic tool. Measuring each and every round is time consuming and the effort won't show up on target.
That's a bit different than saying it doesn't matter. I don't measure every cartridge every time precisely because I know what a given batch of brass will do with a given set of dies with me as the operator.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936 |
Interesting thread.
I always strive for < 0.003 on both brass necks and bullet runout.
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621 |
I might also mention that EVERY factor (including measurement) that's been discussed here is included in my GUN GACK books. They're definitely not The Revelation, because everything learned from reading and talking with other handloaders, plus experience. And I continue to learn something just about every week or month.
But one thing I've noted before about the Campfire (and other Internet sites) is most people want some simple answer for free--especially relative newbies, many of whom have never even bothered to purchase a current loading manual, or if they have, never read anything except the data for the cartridge(s) they plan to reload. JB - I agree on all points - just interesting to hear of a similar opinion put into different words - for me, both resonate & make me a better shooter. Good evenings to all!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,216 Likes: 26 |
Measuring for runout should be reserved for setting up equipment or when making changes to process or used as a diagnostic tool. Measuring each and every round is time consuming and the effort won't show up on target.
That's a bit different than saying it doesn't matter. I don't measure every cartridge every time precisely because I know what a given batch of brass will do with a given set of dies with me as the operator. Exactly.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,447
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,447 |
I’ve always heard that a reasonable goal is .002 or less. Yeah, I lean to .0015.
Don't ask me about my military service or heroic acts...most of it is untrue.
Pronoun: Yes, SIR !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 237
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 237 |
Yesterday evening I loaded up some rounds for a custom barreled 270 Winchester that I am working up loads for. About all I can get are Hornady SST bullets right now for my hunting needs. After loading I checked all of the rounds on my Sinclair concentricity gauge and found a couple were .008” out when measured just in front of the connelure. I had a hard time believing the necks were crooked because I used the Lee Collet die so I then reset the gauge to measure the case necks. They were all within .002”. I am now thinking that the bullet seating die is the problem as I was using the Lee bullet seater and it only makes contact with the tip of the bullet rather than further down closer to the ogive. I am going to pull the bullets and reseat with a RCBS seater to see if it makes a difference. If it doesn’t then it has to be the bullet jacket being thicker on one side I would think. What I don’t understand is how can the bullet be that far off center of axis and it not showing up when measuring the case neck?
|
|
|
|
541 members (1234, 12344mag, 007FJ, 1941USMC, 10ring1, 10gaugeman, 45 invisible),
1,761
guests, and
1,250
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,000
Posts18,520,403
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|