Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire No Charges On Kyle Carruth

That's not entirely true, my son has custody of his daughters due to the exwifes drug problem. He had a damn good lawyer and the money to pay for it.

The problem is - he shouldn't need the lawyer and money - it should be evident and common sense.

I got custody of my two kids- - - -in California- - - -in 1979- - - - -want to guess how bad my ex had to be for that to happen? I had a skillful, but not overly expensive lawyer. Hint- - - - -emotional and physical abuse was involved, plus she was dumb as a box of rocks on the witness stand!

Carruth is protected from any monetary damages in a civil suit under this scenario under Texas law.

All Carruth’s attorney had to do is answer the civil suit stating Carruth has a right to use self-defense to protect himself from the Assault and Battery committed by Reid under the Intentional Tort defenses, and list the statute that applies. The judge will then dismiss the suit as frivolous.

He won’t lose a single dime. All civil suits seeking monetary damages in this case will be Dismissed with Prejudice.

Wonder when chlinstructor is going to post how the State Attorney General got it all wrong and it was murder and then start with the personal attacks of those that disagree?

Never smart to tell a man armed with a gun that you are going to take it away from him. Sometimes stupidity is fatal.

Probably on here, I found mine....


https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/17131804#Post17131804

I wouldn't hold my breath on chlinstructor providing any valid legal interpretations when he doesn't even understand self-defense is an individual's legal right to protect oneself from an assault, and has been Black Letter law for ages.

It's been four months since he claimed in the original thread brandishing a gun on your own property meets the element of provocation, and he can't seem to find the Texas statute backing his position that I asked for to prove it.

If you don't back off, chlinstructor will accuse you of being maser, and post his diaper boy pictures, he has "saved" on his computer, to prove it.

If that doesn't convince you to back off, he'll post a video of a little boy riding in the back of a pickup truck for proof.

And for his closing argument, he'll post some video of a wind up toy, while claiming he can wind you up and "Watch You Go".

He resorts to personsl attacks to back his position. He told me that I was stupid if I thought Carruth would. Actually I didn't think he would walk, I knew he would walk.

Kyle Carruth not only walked, he had no charges filed

Oh, I almost forgot. Then chlinstructor will show you how "Christian" he is by calling you a MF'r and tell everyone he lives rent free in your head, while ignoring the fact he saves pictures of naked young boy, except for a diaper, on his computer that would be you.

Ok Maser/Jason

Everyone who knows what the law states knew he'd walk.

I thoroughly enjoyed hammering the facts for 40+ pages in that other thread, and watching the closet gun hating commies spin the true facts in their meltdown.

And not one single one of my faithful closet commie cyberstalkers on this site in that thread will ever admit in that thread, ever, they were wrong and I was right.

Jurisdiction matters more than anything else in a "self defense" shooting case.

Remember when the BLM riots were going on? Remember the one in Austin where a car was blocked off in the street, and rioters refused to let it move, and were pounding on the car, and one guy ran up to the driver of the car and pointed an AK47 at him, and got shot and killed by the driver?

Pretty clear cut case of self defense right?

They even got photographs of the thug running up, and pointing the AK at the driver...



Wrong.

The Soros placed DA got the Army Sgt. who killed the armed thug indicted.

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...-garrett-foster-daniel-perry/7809946002/


I give him a 95% chance of acquittal. But it doesn't stop him from being indicted and standing trial.

It's not a matter of the law being black and white. It's a matter of jurisdiction, and who you shoot, and who you are.

It's ALL political now.

Simonkenton7,

You quoted my above posting, and stated you found it interesting, and it sounded like I knew what I was talking about.

Then you deleted / removed your posting. I checked, and you have me on ignore. So you toggled your switch for a second to read my response to you.

Thanks for the laughing entertainment, and yes, I know what I'm talking about. People do when they have the law supporting their position.

elkslayer I do not have you on ignore. I have never put anyone on ignore, and in fact I do not even know how to do it.

Save your powder for your enemies, I am not one of them.

I argued he would get off and it did happen. Where is Sandbilly to eat some crow.

There were several that have crow to eat

I’m right here. Show me where i said he would be indicted.

Don’t believe i ever said that. I said he he was a pussy coward. Like you, JWP and Elky. Pussy cowards. 😆

You still looking for the post where i said that? Or you just gonna talk out your ass some more?