Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire No Charges On Kyle Carruth

Yeah I’m trying to be a nicer person.

That’s why I didn’t call you a melodramatic kgunt.

^^^Normal human response.^^^

LMAO.....ignore the actual law that applies in the matter is your position? Just like all commies, unless applying the actual law benefits them.

There it is

Coming from the resident, little dicked, look at me, attention whore I’ll take it as a compliment,

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA [BREATH] [BREATH] BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"I didn't say he'd be indicted" -Sandbilly

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA [BREATH] BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Commies doing what commies do, Pathological liars, constantly.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Lubbock didn't do squat.

The D.A. there passed the political hot potato to the State Atty General's Office because they didn't want to touch it.

Did I say he’d be indicted? It was voluntarily manslaughter you stupid Fugg,

I’m out. You fellas with the little man syndrome can take over. Have fun

Didn’t charge Hillary clinton either so she must be innocent


What happened to that bet you could drive a golf ball over 300 with a 3 wood elk Kahuntee ?

You wouldn't have claimed it was "Voluntary Manslaughter" unless you thought he'd be indicted.

Go run your excuse BS by some fool who will believe your lying azz. And now that jwp pulled up the post to prove you thought he'd be indicted, you tuck tail and run after calling me and others puzzies.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We don't have to bring back Johnny Carson from the dead. We have plenty of laughs right here.

Strawman argument. You lose the debate.

I never challenged anyone to a bet, and it was with a driver, not a 3 wood, but when did any commie ever debate with the true facts.....

1) SB never posted that the little guy would be indicted.

Only that, in his opinion, the little guy had committed the crime of voluntary manslaughter.

2) Your theory was that the big guy had committed "burglary of a domicile", and therefore the little guy was justified in shooting.

Which of course was completely stupid.

"Burglary of a domicile", such a moronic legal sperg that if ya type it in google, ya get no hits.

3) Your spergs are usually so completely moronic, they come nowhere close to a rational outcome.

But this time it was 50/50, best odds there could be.

Coin landed in your favor, but not for the "reason" you posited.

It'll be the closest thing ta a victory you'll ever experience, less a money shot hits ya completely in the mouth.

Good luck.

LOL.

Oh but the State Attorney General convened the Grand Jury in Lubbock. So in the end Lubbock did decided

How can it be "voluntary manslauther" without an indictment or charges

In Texas, grand juries do what the prosecutor wants them to do.

They indict or no-bill according to the recommendation of the prosecutor. I've never seen a case contrary to that.

On occasion, a grand jury will look to the prosecutor for guidance regarding its decisions. Although most prosecutors steer away from flat-out telling the grand jury what they think should be done (i.e., “Please no-bill this case”), there doesn’t seem to be any admonition in the code stopping us. I think the real reason is wariness on the part of the prosecutor to be seen as controlling the grand jury or infringing upon its independence. Such straightforward requests from a prosecutor can often upset the sensibilities of a grand jury, resulting in questions like, “Why are you using us to get rid of the case? Why didn’t you dismiss it?” The reality is that we may be “allowing” them to dispose of a case that ultimately we would have to dismiss. Is that OK, or should we be taking the responsibility and filling out the nolle ourselves? I can say that I have done both many a time. It seems to me that both prosecutors and grand juries have the responsibility of disposing of “bad” cases in our county"


https://www.tdcaa.com/journal/grand-jury-where-the-community-meets-the-law/

ha ha. good one sir!!!!
I forgot that elkkhunt -her wrote that moronic legal analysis. I guess stocking shelves at dollar general doesn't make him a legal egggspurt

As standard practice with you mentally deranged who cyberstalk me here, you lie your azzes off, and twist the facts as far as what I stated.

Yeah, the majority are stated as "Burglary of Habitation". I guess when legal scholars use "domicile" they have it all wrong when discussing the law in articles, and you being the brain trust you are have it correct. I stated Reid broke 5 laws in his actions, not just the lie you stated of only a "Burglary", and my postings are there for the proof.

Funny how you completely ignore my posting stating as such.