|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Have a box of Swift's A-Frame 9.3x62mm factory ammo that I finally got around to capturing some MVs.
Their website says figure on a MV of ~2,400 fps from a 12-twist, 24" barrel. Mine is a 10-twist, 24" barrel.
Cool, I'm thinking I can expect MVs of somewhere's around ~2,350 - ~2,400 fps.
Nope. After first "warming up" the barrel firing 2 handloads (it was 39 degrees out), the 1st A-Frame round: 2,300, and the 2nd A-Frame round: 2,310. I stopped after that.
Either I have a seriously "slow" barrel, or Swift needs to update their website ammo specs page.
I pinged Swift to find out what gives...
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,005
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,005 |
I don't think that's uncommon. It's not unusual for factory ammo to chrono quite a bit slower than advertised, although some is pretty close to the listed velocity. I've had reasonable luck with Federal in that regard, although I load most of the ammo I shoot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Yea, I've had Norma ammo be quite close to spec. I was expecting the same from Swift, but apparently, no cigar.
I'm betting at some point Swift changed their load and didn't get around to updating their website.
We'll see....
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,086 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,086 Likes: 2 |
Have a box of Swift's A-Frame 9.3x62mm factory ammo that I finally got around to capturing some MVs.
Their website says figure on a MV of ~2,400 fps from a 12-twist, 24" barrel. Mine is a 10-twist, 24" barrel.
Cool, I'm thinking I can expect MVs of somewhere's around ~2,350 - ~2,400 fps.
Nope. After first "warming up" the barrel firing 2 handloads (it was 39 degrees out), the 1st A-Frame round: 2,300, and the 2nd A-Frame round: 2,310. I stopped after that.
Either I have a seriously "slow" barrel, or Swift needs to update their website ammo specs page.
I pinged Swift to find out what gives... Figure the 9.3x62mm, like the 6.5x55mm, to be a "hand-load only" affair. Once I've harvested enough PPU brass gettin' comfortable w/ the rifle (Ruger African), will start reloading Speer 270 gr. Hot-Cor's. Followed by Hdy 286 gr. load development, put under 285-6 gr. Orynx and A-Frames. GR
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620 Likes: 1 |
Not uncommon AT ALL. Recent factory offerings in calibers 375 WIN, 300 Savage, 308 WCF, 3006, etc, have ALL failed to come close to factory specs. The ONLY factory ammo that is up to published specs is Weatherby ammo
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,154 Likes: 13
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,154 Likes: 13 |
So, if I'm getting 3000 fps from leetle bullets in my ,257 Bobby I can advertise 3,400, right?
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,632
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,632 |
Arent most test barrels min SAAMI spec'ed? So they always seen to come up with higher speeds?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Not uncommon AT ALL. Recent factory offerings in calibers 375 WIN, 300 Savage, 308 WCF, 3006, etc, have ALL failed to come close to factory specs. The ONLY factory ammo that is up to published specs is Weatherby ammo This is my first experience with factory ammo being a full 100 fps slower from equal length barrels (admittedly, I don't shoot a lot of factory ammo). Fortunately, this was gift card ammo, so I hadn't laid out the big bucks for this stuff. Waiting on a reply from Swift...
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,807
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,807 |
So you’re 40-100 fps slower than expected, but shooting at 39 deg, and you’re going to make big stink with the manufacturer? Seriously?
Do you write to Hornady, Nosler, Barnes, Hodgdon when your reloads don’t give the exact same velocity as published in the reloading manual?
Last edited by Stammster; 04/07/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,935
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,935 |
That's not bad. I chrony'd some factory Hornady (35 Rem and 308 Win) for some friends while at the range, both 200 fps less than advertised.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 171
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 171 |
I seriously doubt any animal you shoot with that ammo will know the difference.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,182
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,182 |
Brian Pearce has often shown factory specs with actual velocity in Rifle or Handloader. Some are slower and some closely match stated velocity. I just checked some Federal 140g Blue box ammo out of my Barrett 6.5x55 with 24" barrel. The box states 2600 fps, but I got 2665 FPS average. This rifle shoots everything very well including these factory loads.
30 are more years ago it was rare to get anywhere near the stated velocity, but it is better these days. You are also using a different rifle than they were.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,247 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,247 Likes: 1 |
Not bad, 300 grains at 2300 will still lay a whop on something, takes me 25 inches of barrel and a stiff charge of RL-17 to get 2400 with 320gr woodleighs.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834 |
Have a box of Swift's A-Frame 9.3x62mm factory ammo that I finally got around to capturing some MVs.
Their website says figure on a MV of ~2,400 fps from a 12-twist, 24" barrel. Mine is a 10-twist, 24" barrel.
Cool, I'm thinking I can expect MVs of somewhere's around ~2,350 - ~2,400 fps.
Nope. After first "warming up" the barrel firing 2 handloads (it was 39 degrees out), the 1st A-Frame round: 2,300, and the 2nd A-Frame round: 2,310. I stopped after that.
Either I have a seriously "slow" barrel, or Swift needs to update their website ammo specs page.
I pinged Swift to find out what gives... Why am I not shocked.
I never thought I'd grow up to be a grumpy old man, but I did, and I'm killin' it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Thinking about it some more, that 286 grain SAF @ 2,300 MV is probably perfect for Cape Buffalo Cow culling.
Bust through, do the damage, and with a high degree of certainty the bullet won't exit.
What's not to like?
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 901
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 901 |
Winchester rifles and Swarovski scopes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,390
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,390 |
Pretty much everything I chrono in 9.3x62 factory ammo is 100 to 200 fps slower than advertised. I think it's a combo of long throats and US companies being worried about old guns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Nope. I followed up with a data set for a string of 10 shots. But never heard back. I know the chrony is correct - well known loads in 6.5 CM, .308, & .30-06 report spot-on. I figure at some point their online info for nominal MV will just change without notice. No-problemo....
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,232 |
Pretty much everything I chrono in 9.3x62 factory ammo is 100 to 200 fps slower than advertised. I think it's a combo of long throats and US companies being worried about old guns. I've had factory ammo from Norma and Geco actually chrony faster than nominal MV...
It's you and the bullet, and all the rest is secondary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,390
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,390 |
Pretty much everything I chrono in 9.3x62 factory ammo is 100 to 200 fps slower than advertised. I think it's a combo of long throats and US companies being worried about old guns. I've had factory ammo from Norma and Geco actually chrony faster than nominal MV... In 9.3x62? Or other calibers? Just looked up my notes. Norma 285gr factory loads ran at 2290 fps in my 24" barrel, so only about 75 fps slower than claimed, but still. Definitely possible my barrel has an extra extra long throat, but it seems that most people find that 9.3x62 factory ammo is slow.
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,371
Posts18,488,327
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|